WI: Illinois judge who reversed rape conviction removed from bench after panel finds he circumvented law

Source: yahoo.com 2/24/24

CHICAGO (AP) — An Illinois judge who sparked outrage by reversing a man’s rape conviction involving a 16-year-old girl has been removed from the bench after a judicial oversight body found he circumvented the law and engaged in misconduct.

The Illinois Courts Commission removed Adams County Judge Robert Adrian from the bench Friday after it held a three-day hearing in Chicago in November on a compliant filed against Adrian.

Its decision says Adrian “engaged in multiple instances of misconduct” and “abused his position of power to indulge his own sense of justice while circumventing the law.”

 The commission could have issued a reprimand, censure or suspension without pay, but its decision said it had “ample grounds” for immediately removing Adrian from the bench in western Illinois’ Adams County.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

SOOO many directions a discussion on this can go here in the forum…just action or not just by the alleged victim/review board? Judges afraid to mete out justice as they see it when it is less than the law on the books? Legislatures/Congresses meting out justice (which is all relative you know based upon the subjectivity of the crime) which is in violation of the separate powers of the judicial and legislature branches?

There has to be checks and balances, of course, of those who work the judicial system whatever their position, but would a defendant be able to do this same recourse in the same way to get a better result in the end for themself (where they usually go through an appellate court path)?

Reading more about this situation would be interesting to find out the considerations, etc since it was not a recall vote from the bench like Persky got in CA, but flat out peer review of their conduct.

Has anyone ever heard of a case of a judge removed from the bench for something that wasn’t showing mercy to a man accused of date rape? It’s amusing that the party that leads this effort is also the party the world is counting on to reform America’s justice system (and, sadly, the party us PFRs are depending on for a modicum of registry reform).

The problem is rarely the jail sentencing but what comes after.

Another instance of where a mere accusation is sufficient proof in sex crime prosecutions, and judges who find otherwise are subject to discipline.

Also, am I the only one who thinks that this article never would have been written if the crime in question were, say, an armed robbery instead of a sex offense?

Had this happened pre-social media, this judge would’ve most likely kept his job and nobody would’ve questioned the ruling. Unfortunately – and predictably – the Internet is an outrage echo chamber that has become a toxic court of public opinion where “doing the right thing” is entirely based upon knee-jerk emotional pleas.