MO: St. Louis City firefighter found dead after charges filed

Source: firstalert4.com 3/28/24
[ACSOL is posting this to show how violation of trust by a person in public service can be especially devastating on multiple levels]

ST. LOUIS, Mo. (First Alert 4) – A St. Louis City firefighter accused of possessing videos of child sexual abuse material was found dead Thursday, investigators said.

Prosecutors charged 50-year-old Jarret ____ on Thursday with two counts of possessing more than 20 photos or videos of child pornography, a class B felony.

St. Charles City police confirmed on Friday that Jarret was found dead Thursday night. It is believed he took his own life.

According to the department, Jarret was a 25-year veteran of the St. Louis City Fire Department. The City of St. Louis confirmed he was still a firefighter at the time of his death.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It really would be interesting to know how much of the “material” he was charged for was actual abuse or teens making videos of themselves. Was his reasoning behind taking such drastic measures simply because he got caught looking at something? Or was he implicated in the production of said material? Beings lawmakers refuse to acknowledge the sexual curiosities of anyone without the legal ability to consent, lawmakers view every single sexual event as now criminal in nature with the sole explicit intent of just destroying someone because they viewed such activity. Laws need reviewed and context provided for all charges. Sex isn’t going to end. It’s time for a rational approach to the issue.

Another senseless loss of life. A dedicated civil servant that felt his life was over. The city didn’t even feel the need to say anything positive about him , probably out of fear of looking like they actually supported him in this time of personal crisis. He would have had more support if he had been found to be a murderer or drug dealer. Or even a drunk driver that took a life. His picture will likely be removed from his fire company wall and he won’t receive the funeral service he deserves after 25 yrs of saving buildings and rescuing people and pets. Well I for one will salute you Jarrett for your honorable public service. 🫡👨🏼‍🚒

How is this registry making anyone safe ? or constitutional ?