KS: Changes to juvenile offender registration shelved

[gctelegram.com]

TOPEKA — A Kansas House bill contemplating changes to juvenile offender registration has been delayed so that it can be reviewed by the Judicial Council.

The council will review the legislation and make recommendations on how to proceed, Rep. J. Russell Jennings, R-Lakin, said during a committee meeting last week. No legislative action is expected this session.

Last month, three people spoke in favor of the measure, which proposed treating juvenile sex offenders the same as adult sex offenders in terms of registration requirements. Information on adult sex offenders is publicly available. In juvenile cases, judges have discretion on making registration public and on the length of registration.

The bill was propelled by the August 2017 double homicide of former Garden City resident Alyssa Runyon and her daughter Zaylynn Paz. The pair were murdered in Newton by a man who had been convicted of sex crimes as a juvenile and whose information wasn’t on the public offender registry.

Sarah Good, Runyon’s aunt, testified that current law prioritizes the rights of the offender over the rights of the general public. Changing the law gives the public the opportunity to be aware, informed and protected, she said.

Runyon’s father and Rep. John Whitmer, a Wichita Republican, also testified as proponents of the bill.

Several individuals and groups, including the Kansas Department of Corrections, opposed the measure.

Benet Magnuson, executive director of Kansas Appleseed, said Kansas case law has determined that it is ineffective and unfair to punish youths as though they were adults.

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Sounds more like an argument to make every conviction public, not just sex offenses. Pretty sure parents would love to know that person their child is riding with hasn’t had prior DUI’s. Or that person they’re starting a relationship wasn’t wasn’t a domestic abuser. Or that business partner doesn’t have history of theft and cooking books.

Just stop with the “if only”. If you were that concerned about peoples history, you’d be using those million and one background check services. And those actually cover everything. One person’s laziness shouldn’t destroy millions of lives.

Geeeeee, I wonder why……..👉🏻🤑👈🏻

“…research has shown youth registration is ineffective and that resources should be redirected towards prevention and treatment. Research has also determined that youth registration can be harmful.”

I know this article focuses on kids, but ADULT registration is equally as ineffective and harmful. Resources that go towards registration of any kind would be better spent on prevention and treatment.