Edinburgh, Scotland: Man who raped girl, 13, appeals conviction

A rapist given community service after attacking a 13-year-old girl says he is the victim of a miscarriage of justice.

Lawyers for Sean Hogg, 21, told the appeal court that the judge misdirected the jury during his trial and the conviction should be quashed.

Hogg was found guilty of attacking his young victim multiple times in Dalkeith Country Park in 2018, when he was 17.

He avoided prison after judge Lord Lake consulted Scotland’s new sentencing guidelines for people aged under 25.

Donald Findlay KC told the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh that Hogg had suffered “a very significant” miscarriage of justice from Lord Lake.

He said: “The verdict that the jury brought back was demonstrably wrong.”

Prosecutors from the Crown Office accepted that the judge misdirected the jury and that part of the verdict should be quashed.

Solicitor general Ruth Charteris KC told the court: “The Crown’s position is that mistakes were made during the trial.”

 
However, the Crown argued that the jury still heard enough evidence for Hogg to be convicted of raping the girl on a single occasion.

Hogg was found guilty earlier this year of multiple rapes, but due to the new under-25 sentencing guidelines, he was not jailed and instead given 270 hours of unpaid work.

Lord Lake said if Hogg had committed the crime when he was over 25, he would have given him a jail sentence of four or five years.

Three of Scotland’s most senior judges are considering the appeal.

During the hearing Lord Justice General Lady Dorrian noted that when the jury returned their verdict, the judge, prosecutor and defence immediately realised it was “incompetent” and contrary to the directions they had been given on the law.

The verdict was allowed to stand and Lord Lake’s subsequent decision not to jail Hogg attracted widespread criticism.

He had said that under guidelines for sentencing people aged under 25, his primary consideration had to be rehabilitation.

‘Judge failed me’

Hogg, from Hamilton in South Lanarkshire, was also put under supervision and added to the sex offenders register for three years.

After the trial, Hogg’s victim said she was failed by the justice system and the outcome would deter other girls from reporting rape.

She said: “I did not get justice, the judge failed me, he didn’t protect me. You let him go, but gave me, the victim, a life sentence.”

The girl had been diagnosed with PTSD and underwent three years of counselling after the attacks.

Earlier this year, First Minister Humza Yousaf said he believed those convicted of rape should go to prison but added that sentencing decisions had to be made by the courts.

Lady Dorrian said the appeal involved “difficult” issues and the judges would issue its decision at a later date.

Source

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Ok this guy’s asking too much here. Even my sympathies don’t go that far. He sounds like a legitimately dangerous individual. I cannot condone use of force in any matter concerning sexual intercourse. He was treated, extremely leniently under the circumstances.

“Lord Lake said if Hogg had committed the crime when he was over 25, he would have given him a jail sentence of four or five years.”😲

Daggone! Even 4 to 5 years is a lenient sentence for someone who sexually assaulted a 13 year old. In America, a person can get that sentence just for viewing an image of a minor assaulted in that manner. If I was a registrant in Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 I’d be thanking God everyday that I don’t live in America 🇺🇸

This guy got a slap on the wrist. Only 3 years on the registry and no prison time? Come on man, had he done that over here he’d be serving at least 20 years plus lifetime registration.
Dude needs to drop his appeal and move on.

While the length of time in comparison to ‘Merica is much shorter, how is their system overseas compared to the one here for the population of SOs in lock up, e.g., meaning will he need to fear for his life daily and watch his six continually like those here do when word gets out of his deed? If on par, then his time may feel much longer than what is stated.