Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is definitely cool 🙂 But why do these news outlets always say CA-RSOL “claims” these ordinances are unconstitutional? WTF is up with that? Then they always say things like “has successfully challenged” them in court?” Why is it that it’s never mentioned that the state supreme court “ruled these illegal ordinances unconstitutional?” Or that these cities are in violation of the law each day they have these ordinances on the books? They never even come close to touching on the “facts” that registrants re-offend at less than 6% and most other crimes are somewhere in the 70%+ range for re-offense. They never mention that kids are in more danger from trusted and known people than they are from strangers, and that registrants are the least likely to abscond with their children. They never “inform” their readers that this is all backed up by statistics from reputable sources like the DOJ and the CDC, as well as CASCOMB and that years of empirical evidence also points to the futility and lack of a need for these kinds of preemptive laws. Whats up with all that?

0
Reply
View Replies (4)

As I have suggested time and time again…keep them busy in court.

If every sex offender in every city would be represented by lawyers who were not simply lawyers for the money but rather the love of the law then the courts would be so busy defending their illegal laws that they would not have time to enact more!

The publicity of constant sex offenders in court suing would at least keep the injustice in the public’s collective conscience and might finally show the inconsistencies and illogical use of the sex offender registry.

It might shatter the illusion of safety the government claims it creates (total lie that has been proven time and time again)!

Sue the city! Sue every city! Sue the state! Sue the federal government!

0
Reply
View Replies (1)

Janice Bellucci truly has God on her side. Keep up the great work!

0
Reply