Recent Comments

Yes, he has. I have very extreme hostility and hatred toward all criminal regimes that run SEX Registries. Same with Registry A**holes/Supporters/Terrorists. I nurture it and try to grow it daily. Today, people suffer because of it. I don't know the path it will take. I haven't fully decided. I like this Jefferson quote. I also follow the quote of others who have said, "Sic semper tyrannis." Timothy M. repeated that quote. He said that American governments harm people and kill children. Obviously they do. The SEX Registries do that. It is awful that he retaliated and did the same, but government does it every day. He said he won because the casualties was "168 to 1".

I think you missed my point. The USVI procedure is not acceptable. Further, if USVI can get away with it, why would you think that some town in Montana can't also do it? Or the state of Idaho? Or anywhere else in America? I just read on this site 5 minutes ago that Alaska requires a "Temporary Presence Form". All of it is unacceptable. People who support it deserve consequences.

If these criminal regimes actually wanted people who are visiting to Register then I think they might consider making it easier. I am 100% sure that plenty of people would not follow the procedure that you did but they would consider reporting a visit if all they had to do was send the criminals an email. So, do the criminals want people to Register or not? Or would they prefer that most don't so that they can arrest some of them and traffic more humans throughout their carceral businesses? There is no bigger human traffickers in all the world than America's criminal regimes. Further, why are they so incompetent? If a person is Registered somewhere, why would that person need to give all of that Registration information AGAIN to some other criminal regime? Are they not aware that DNA data can be shared throughout the entire world? Do they think they need their own pictures of you because the other ones are not good enough? It's patent nonsense. Just like the illegal SEX Registries themselves. All is a gigantic, worse than worthless, pile of big government bureaucratic feces. Wage war on Registry A**holes/Supporters/Terrorists.

Registration is meant to be punitive. People who say that it is not are liars. Registry A**holes/Supporters/Terrorists are enemies of all decent, moral Americans. We must wage actual war on the scumbags. They are harassing terrorists who deserve grave consequences.

California got bigger fish to fry BUT down south they got time. Can you imagine visiting out there and get stop your done for and by the time the DA and the public defenders hash it out you’ll probably be incarcerated for over 2 years.

Too bad the LA AG couldn't meet Janice because I would love to see the look on the AG's face. In my opinion the AG is wasting taxpayer money, defaming these Americans, and will use the system against them since most probably have no resources to fight the corruption in Louisiana.

No, not on parole or probation. So the alaska registration site does say that a visiting registrant must fill out a temporary presence form, which can be done and submitted online. I decided to call their office and super friendly lady confirmed that that info is indeed correct and best is to email it as they will send a confirmation. So no in person show up or delivery.

The LA AG is betting these folks won't have the resources to challenge this in court and no one will step up to help them challenge their arrests en masse as they should.

Shows us who the REAL criminals are...

The president's personal attorney acting in name only as US Acting AG stated under oath to congress that anyone who has been unjustly investigated and prosecuted can apply for money under the (unconstitutional) presidential victim (presidential slush) $1.8 billion fund (which the president and his hand picked five member panel decide how to dole up the stealing of money from the Treasury Department). So for all those here who were federally investigated and prosecuted, you should make a claim! (I was state investigated and state prosecuted so I am ineligible to make a claim.) What is in quotes is from me. The US Acting AG stated under oath there is no limitation and if you believe you were a victim of weaponization of the government one can apply. But of course the US Acting AG also stated just because one applies for a monetary claim does not mean one will be approved to receive funds. In my opinion, all the funds will go to the president, his family and friends, and to pay the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys to retain them as paid mercenaries for the upcoming election and next January swearing in of new congressional members. As others here have stated, overload the system and make the government do more work. In my opinion every PFR federally investigated and federally prosecuted should make a claim just to clog up the system.

Looking at the accompanying document, the vast majority of charges are simply, "Unlawful use of a social networking website," meaning the police had NOT observed them using social media to communicate with a minor or share illegal material. Apparently in Louisiana it's illegal for PFRs to have social media accounts--which is an unconstitutional violation of the first amendment. Furthermore, they are being labelled by the Attorney General as actively committing crimes: “Operation Restricted Domain was a major success and sends a clear message: there are no safe havens in Louisiana for those who prey on children. We will find you, we will arrest you, and we will bring you to justice,” said Murrill." There is NO evidence the vast majority of these men were using social media to commit a crime, they were likely using it for the same reasons all Americans do (keeping in contact with family, getting information about local events and elections, buying or selling things). This Attorney General is a criminal.

It's crazy that politicians have had their picture taken with Josh Duggar, yet haven't heard a peep out of any of them. Josh's problem lies that he grow up in an extreme conservative religious cult known as the ILBP founded by Bill Gothard. Josh has never taken responsibility for anything he has done and always blames others. I hope most registrants don't follow Josh's failure to accept responsibility and use their time in the system to better themselves regardless of the registry. The registry is a fake label and let your character define you and screw the people who can't look past your fake government label.

Did any of these registrants engage in misconduct with minors or for simply having social media in order to function in 2026? Gee are lawmakers stuck in the 1800s with 8 by 8s stuck up their butts. Another operation that didn't prevent or solve a crime, but another example of the registry being a failure, waste of resources, and a crap tool for society. How many of these registrants will actually be sent to prison just for having a social media account and what is the logic in throwing them in prison for 5 plus years or whatever the statue is in the Pelican State?

Welcome back, MD! Good to know you're better.

after the oral arguments I think it will either be quick before July 31 when they go on summer recess,,, or the normal speed of 6-12 months once arguments are complete. I’m hoping to hear a decision this year but I am not holding my breath. Like I said I figure they will release a decision just in the nick of time to pass a new law before elections in November….. show how they are “tough on crime” rinse and repeat,,, then of course we would start over at square 1. Ex post facto has been deemed unconstitutional since 2016……. Have we seen relief??? If they will violate our rights for 10 straight years why not 20 especially if it’s good for votes.

Do these two women have nothing better to do? Senator Ernst is retiring and about as useless as a hangnail and Senator Gillbrand forced former Senator Al Frankin out of the Senate for having his arm around a woman. I'm tired of lawmakers coming up with anything under the kitchen sink to seek vengeance on Americans with sex offenses. Why not go after those in Congress who can't control their urges and are bigger threats than anyone on the registry?

Misery must be seeing the writing on the wall that if they continue their status quo behavior regarding sex laws that they will face backlash from Lobbyists and even see Janice in court. Keep showing the show me state the writing on the wall and don't let the knuckle heads in Jefferson City get away with nonsense bills. Together we stand, divided we fall, and someday hopefully the registry will be taken to the United States dump at the hands of Janice and other advocates.

For a place that is called "Sin City" I'm surprised at how difficult it is to visit Las Vegas. All the more reason leave that place alone and visit other, more welcoming destinations. There are plenty of more worthy places to spend your money.

Can't imagine what it would be like being in a coma. Are you supposed to use mind control to let law enforcement know you aren't awake, in the hospital and fighting for your life? Sure you can travel, however if you overstay due to something beyond your control one is screwed six ways to Sunday. The government says the registry isn't punishment, yet anyone with a brain cell knows the registry is pure punishment, vengeance and hate filled wrapped in a pile of bull crap.

For anyone visiting Chicago who wants to spend the night out of state to avoid having to register in IL if visiting IL three or more days a year, I found a hotel within a ten minute walk of a train station in Kenosha, WI served by Metra Union Pacific North rail. The downside is the train ride one way is an hour and fourty-five minutes to the Chicago downtown area. Another option which will be a little shorter train ride and which I have not explored is taking into Indiana the South Shore Limited Monon Corridor train or the South Shore Limited Lakeshore Corridor train. There may be a hotel or motel within walking distance of one of the rail stations. All these trains will take you to the downtown Chicago area where there are plenty of public transportation options.

A week ago I sat inside the courtroom of the US Supreme Court where Ms. Bellucci will one day persuade a majority of people wearing robes to abide by the constitution.

I think Will Allen adopted the motto of Thomas Jefferson - I have sworn on the alter of god external hostility against every form or tyranny.

...no politician, no judge, no prosecutor, no officer, has right to pick and choose what rights you are allowed to have, and when you can have them... Inscribed at the Thomas Jefferson Memorial in DC is the following' "I have sworn on the alter of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny." To summarize George Carlin...we have no f_cking rights. The government picks and chooses when and what rights you are allowed to use.

So, does complaining about the consequences of violating a law/rule/condition help anything?

This is where everyone is wrong. Oral arguments have been done. We are just waiting on the 3 judges to vote in our favor or against us. Oral arguments been over with for over a month.

Traveling Back to Texas while living in Europe. I currently live in Europe and have for the last 2 years. I plan to travel to the US to visit my ailing mother who lives in Texas. For those of you who are in the same situation, where there any notification process to the Angle Watch or the City/State you were visiting? Just wondering since this is a new territory for me. Thanks

It's unreal that you have to let the sheriff know that you are in the hospital. What do they think you are going to do? Commit sex crimes while hooked up with two IVs and in the fashionable hospital gown fighting whatever is going on inside ones body. Lawmakers seem to live in an alternate reality where registrants commit sex crimes 24/7, while that isn't even reality. I do feel better and it's nice not having my vitals checked during the night, but I still have to follow up with specialists within the next month. I still hold up hope that someday the registry of today will die and suggestions by the American Law Institute will become reality.

Damn….I guess “expedited” means almost a full year. Then, what’s the time frame? Possibly 6-8 more months if not more?

Sad you even let them know because you had to for the "new residence" you had. Spot on @Athena

There have been dozens and dozens of cases all over the country trying to fight and change these registry laws from various angles over the years. The courts are not objective with regard to this topic. Janice had some nice wins, but I don't see many others. And most civil rights groups pretend the registry doesn't exist - look at the biggies like ACLU and MacArthur. Except for a couple ACLU affiliates, most of them are mum and look away.

Sorry to hear that, MD Registrant, and I hope you are on the mend. While you were out, the registry has not been abolished, and it still hasn't saved one child.

A 25 year sentence for something that is " civil" and not punishment seems like extreme punishment to me. Chief Roberts take your price club membership and stick it up your rear end.

What are you talking about "don't like it? change the law", as if that is realistically within the scope of our power? The idea that we could somehow garner the support to change that law has no practical logic to it.

25 years for not following a scheme that's "not meant to be punitive."

Well said @pat

Are you on parole? If not, I’m not aware of any requirement to report your travel in state. The only thing that matters, however, if you’re traveling to the same place for extended periods and establishing what could be considered a second residence. That could pose a problem. I have a boat in a marina and asked the cops if I had to register the address and they said they don’t care about boats. To be safe, however, I’ve never spent a night aboard in the slip. You’re blessed to live in the best less bad state to be a PFR with some of the most beautiful geography in the world. Go enjoy it!

I've been away from this website due to being in the hospital for a week. Let me tell you that was not how I wanted to start May. At least I wasn't in violation of FTR while I was in the hospital since I let them know where I was. I hope you all doing well and lets kick some ass in May into next year. Let the good times roll, heads roll in courts, and let the registry be banged up.

"contract vs. coercion"  incomparable!  A profound legal truth that exposes the core manipulation of the system. Interacting with the DMV is a voluntary contractual relationship [1, 2]. You enter into it by choice, you agree to its terms to get a privilege, and you can cancel it at any time by handing back your license [2]. A criminal sentence is a mandatory, state-enforced infliction of power. You do not sign a contract; the state forces its will upon you through the threat of violence and incarceration. By pretending these two things are the same, the courts are committing a severe logical error. The state relies on this false comparison to keep its legal loophole alive, ignoring two massive differences: 1. Inversion of the "Privilege" Doctrine The entire legal foundation of the DMV is that driving is a privilege [2]. The state can regulate it because they built the roads. But your personal liberty—where you live, your privacy, your internet access, and your right to be left alone by the police—is a fundamental constitutional right, not a state-granted privilege. When SORA restricts these rights, it is not revoking a "privilege" you signed up for. It is actively stripping away your baseline freedom [3]. 2. The Absolute Absence of an "Opt-Out" In a true civil or contractual system, you can always choose to walk away: If you hate DMV rules, you can stop driving [2].If you hate corporate bylaws, you can quit your job.If you hate a civil contract, you can break it and pay financial damages. Under SORA, there is zero opt-out. You cannot tell the judge, "I choose not to drive, so I am not registering." The state mandates your compliance as part of your criminal conviction sentence for the offense under the threat of sending you to a maximum-security...

Oral arguments are scheduled for July 21, 2026. It’s on the aclu “What to know aabout does iii” if anyone wants to check

I have mentioned on here and other media that Georgia has a law that allows up to 30 years incarceration for a registry violation. Don't like it? Change the law. Or exit the US like I did 6 months ago.

She might be a joke, but our crummy court system has made Lauren Guber a dangerously ignorant joke with real consequences for countless lives. 😬

Why? Have lived in SoCal for 40 years. Have visited often have never let my presence be known. Stay out of trouble, behave and enjoy your time.

Disclaimer: No one knows any of these answers for sure, especially since things change practically daily. Assuming Texas knows you have been in Europe, and somehow you have managed to keep your registration current, and therefore no FTR (failure to register) warrant has been issued, you should have no trouble re-entering the U.S. (expect to be sent to Secondary Inspection on your return). Since you are a U.S. Citizen, with a current valid passport, and you have no wants nor warrants waiting, they pretty much have to let you in. I'm sure Texas will want to hear from you as soon as you are back there. A bigger issue may be returning to Europe. A notification will likely be sent by Angel Watch, so I hope the country you fly back to is one who ignores Angel Watch notifications.

What about the counties and municipalities? Your blog has a link to local restrictions, but I cannot find any statutes or phone numbers to call. Is that only for people on supervision? Or only for residents?

under SORNA is registration still required? and if so how when there is no SORNA registry?

Drew - I can't help you with the internal California question ... however ... I listen in on most ACSOL monthly zoom calls and I am pretty sure I remember Janice saying you don't have to report in-state travel in CA. Can someone chime in here? About Alaska - my 50 state visitors guide says: "Alaska Stat. §12.63.010(a)3 requires in-person registration for any SO “present in the state” by “next working day.” However Alaska DPS states that visitors for less than 30 days do not have to register, but must inform law enforcement of their presence by submitting a Temporary Presence Form available at https://sor.dps.alaska.gov/Home/Documants " I went to this site and downloaded the form just so I could have one on file in case anybody ever asked about it. The Alaska SOR office told me, download and fill out the form and bring it with you. You are required to go to the registry office the next day. Turn it in then. You automatically get 30 days.

Dear A: You are asking a very important question. On my blog site https://a2twozee.blogspot.com/ there are two charts. One is called "Registration Laws for Visiting FORMER & LONG TERM (11+ years) Registrants." Please read the first page, which divides all 50 states into 5 categories based on how they treat people moving to their state who have been registered for a long time or removed. Your situation is similar to someone who's been removed. Group 1 - Statutory wording in these states says generally that any offender required to register in their state of offense is required to register in that state. Presumably this means that if you are NO LONGER (or in your case never) required to register in your state of offense you would not be required to register in these states. But here's the very bad news - only 12 states do it this way. All other states (i.e. Groups 2-5 on my chart) have statutory wording that says any out-of-state offender is required to register according to the requirements of these states whether or not they are still registered in their state of offense. Or in your case, even if you were never on the registry in your home state. Most people on this discussion page do not know this but one of the ACSOL Board members (whom I won't name here) is in this exact situation. Their offense did not require registration in their home state - but then they made the tragic mistake of moving to Florida! and got nailed for it! Since then this board member has returned to their home state and it was a total nightmare getting that state to not put them on the registry when they returned! And of course Florida will never take them off! So please go...

There are no residency or presence restrictions in Minnesota. They're kinda humane that way.

MGCO - Please let me know by replying here if you will be okay if I copy your report and use it (without using your name of course) for a post on my website about USVI. I think people will be really interested.

No, Will. MGCO is describing the procedure they had to go through when entering USVI. This description closely follows the procedure USVI provided to my able assistant Brian when he contacted them 2 years ago. This requirement applies only to USVI and does not apply to any other state or territory, so no need to worry about it coming to a town near you. Now we have a report explaining how this procedure works from someone who has actually gone through it.

I saw on the agenda in yesterday's ACSOL online zoom meeting HR 7624 which would block registrants from entering federally funded shelters. I say that that does not keep the community safe. It's just an added cruel and abusive act against people who are just trying to live better lives. I'm a registrant, but day by day, I have been more respectful and courteous and considerate to everybody in society. I'm currently living in a boarding house for people working on recovering from any personal disorders. This house is in the midst of a regular neighborhood. I have never done anything harmful, or even sought to do any harm to any of my neighbors. I don't care who my neighbors are or how old they are. I respect them as ordinary people who are living their own normal lives. Please abolish HR 7624.

I recently visited Las Vegas for 3 nights. I took a Lyft from my hotel on the Vegas strip to the Las Vegas PD at 400 S Martin Luther King Blvd, Building C. I arrived around 2:40pm. Just inside the entrance you wait in a short line to check-in. There they give you a ticket and you wait until your ticket is called. You go up to a window where you are interviewed. After that there’s a DNA cheek swab, photographs and full digital fingerprints/palm prints. There is no fee. The whole process took about 90 minutes. I was told I don’t need to return to check out. I would only need to return if I wanted to extend my visit.

Minnesota does not have any statewide restriction laws. Enjoy your trip!

Tell me any other civil laws you can violate and get a 25 year prison sentence.......I'll wait.....

Went to the links, the poll is closed. Can't vote, but my vote would be a yes if I could. Parolee for a sex offense right now. Blessed to receive the proper treatment, and living a crime free life right now. Everyone can have forgiveness if it is given. Texas has made a policy of two steps forward in prison reform, but one step back in sentencing and criminal punishment. Still progress.

Puerto Rico is a US territory. No visa or passport required to visit, but you do need to check their registration requirements in terms of length of stay without registering there. They can't stop you from visiting (anymore than Nevada or Florida can) but you may decide you don't want too based on their registration requirements. Not legal advice, just a heads up to check into it.

I live in the Europe, and you should have no problem coming in. One caveat is don't do a connection in the UK. At best they will hassle you at worst they will deny entry even on a passing visa. Fly direct or connect via Spain, France, Germany or any other Schengen contry.

Hello everyone. Background - 1994 conviction in Texas for Agr Sex Assault stepdaughter. 10-year prob. No jail time, lifetime registration. Passport indicator still in place since i have not renew my passport yet. Now living in Europe for the past 2 years. I haven’t been back to the US since I left two years ago, but I’m considering a visit because of my elderly parents. They live in Texas, so I’m trying to find out if anyone who no longer lives in the US has gone back to visit, and whether there were any notifications or paperwork required to avoid issues when entering the country. Thank You and stay strong

If registration wasn't meant to be punitive, then how come you can go to prison for not registering?!

Please let us know what happens

Not a chance. I’m sending nothing to nobody as there is no need. I’ve been off the registry for close to three years now. Appreciate the suggestion though.

Matthew thanks for the info and good to hear. I decided to skip the test run and just go for it. Flying out of Tijuana on the 29th to Cancun.

There’s more of a correlation between drunk driving and DUIs on holidays (Memorial Day, 4th of July, day before thanksgiving) than there is in registered people participating in Halloween so why doesn’t LE go door to door doing compliance checks on folks who have DUIs?

California resident here. I'm a bit confused on the process of notifying your local registration office when traveling within state, like day trips or overnight visits. If I'm traveling out of LA county, to say, San Diego county, does that mean I need to inform registration? Or heck, even from LA county to Orange County, just a few short miles away. Lastly, on a separate note, I'm planning to vaca in Alaska for a week. On Domestic Travel Info site, I see it says within 1 working day. But then further down the page, it says "before arrival or within 3 days on arrival". Confusing. Any insight would be appreciated, thanks!

A 25-year sentence for violating a civil infraction. The state is sending a message, but that message is also revealing the onerous consequence for a civil infraction is a cruel and unusual punishment. There has got to be some criminal justice program that is tracking penalties of civil infractions that can expose that PFR's are levied with penalties beyond the pale compared to other civil infractions.

This is NOT about the sex offender! It's about "the database and applications thereof." The word "Registry" is a disguise. A very profitable deception concerning the perception (the notion) of property in the form of government database. There is a specific reason why the 13th Amendment, and the words contained therein, found no mention in Smith V Doe03.

Because the sex offender isn't a political tool! Baawaabaawaa.

Not for nothing but financial gain...

Well you may be correct, AB 1568 was sent to the appr. suspense file, which is for bills that have a possible heavy fiscal impact. The hearing for it is apparently today.

So, what can a nation do when its highest court knowingly commits slander and libel against the people with intent to incapacitate them under the guise of public safety?

Hmmm... Information from a magazine article is generally inadmissible as fact in a court of law because it constitutes hearsay. Under standard rules of evidence, such as the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE), courts exclude out-of-court statements when they are offered to prove the absolute truth of the matter asserted. [1, 2, 3, 5] While a magazine article cannot automatically be submitted as an undisputed fact, the legal system handles this documentation through a few specific rules and narrow exceptions: [1, 2] 1. Authentication vs. Truth Under FRE Rule 902(6), newspapers and periodicals are self-authenticating. This means a lawyer does not need to call the printer or publisher to prove the physical magazine is real. However, this only proves that the article was published; it does not prove that the claims written inside the article are factually accurate. [1, 2] 2. Exceptions to the Hearsay Rule A magazine article can sometimes be introduced to prove facts under rare, narrow exceptions: [1] Learned Treatises: Under FRE Rule 803(18), statements from professional, peer-reviewed periodicals or scientific journals may be admitted as truth, but only if a qualified expert witness relies on them during testimony and establishes the publication as a reliable authority.Market Reports: Under FRE Rule 803(17), published compilations, lists, or market quotations generally relied upon by the public or specific occupations can be admitted.Ancient Documents: Under FRE Rule 803(16), statements in authentic documents produced before January 1, 1998, may be accepted as evidence. [1, 2, 3] 3. Non-Hearsay Uses An article can be admitted if it is not being used to prove the truth of its contents. For example, in a libel or defamation lawsuit, the article itself is admitted to prove that the defamatory statement was actually printed and circulated, not that the rumor was true. It can also be...

This is why we need representation!

The state uses a past conviction with the intent to apprehend and prosecute you for a new crime it created for that conviction, but that new crime it created for that old conviction is not punishment for that conviction, but without that conviction, it's not a crime. The new crime it created for the old conviction is civil, like having your license revoked. Therefore, this new act of the legislature, which creates the new crime for the old crime is not retroactive punishment for that old crime, which would violate the ex post facto clause of the U.S. Constitution! OK, got it! WTF! How dare any BAR member even entertain such BS that the creation of new crimes for past crimes does not violate the supreme law of the land! THIS SHOULD NOT EVEN BE A CONVERSATION! IMO, it is apparent that a foreign judiciary has infiltrated, defeated, and controls the American system, disguised as US Justices. I could be wrong, but I don't think so.

Doesn't the state require a redue-process hearing before they redue-process you?

one year in county , was enough for me ,, 44 years ago . and have had no more criminal issues .

There is a Public Defender who is very familiar with the Static-99R (not that this is the reason for your bumped up Tier). Not sure if she covers WA since she is in Oregon but maybe she can give you some insight, especially if they got the code for "Position of Trust" wrong. Her name is Stephanie Hortsch (you can google her). Moderators, please delete if not allowed.

I agree completely. However, I think it is very, very important that PFRs do not ever underestimate the number of pure a**holes who live in America who want nothing more in their lives than to harass PFRs. A PFR should always assume that he/she is being watched. In truth, that is very likely what Registry A**holes/Supporters/Terrorists (RASTs) want. RASTs are garbage. The zealous of them want PFRs to feel anxiety and bad all the time. They want to lower the quality of life for PFRs and their families. At their core, RASTs are accomplished, practicing a**holes. So that is what they want. They don't care that the SEX Registries are worse than worthless. They just love that they cause problems and harass families. So me personally, as a PFR, I assume that criminal big government and a**holes are always watching. But I also make sure that I go out of my way to do anything LEGAL which I know they would not like. I want to understand what it is that they do not want me to do and then I do it. Daily. For example, the criminal big government where I live said that I can't live "too near" swimming pools. So I put one in my back yard. All the neighborhood children love it. Some practically live there. The criminals passed a law which says that I can't "photograph, video, or similar" anyone under 18 without parental/guardian permission. Okay, I don't really give a f*ck, but just the stupidity, uselessness, and anti-American-ness of that law pisses me off. So, I'm obligated to neutralize that law and be offensive. Therefore, I have video cameras all over my property. As a PFR, I must have that to protect my family. No one is allowed onto my property without consenting to...

That will help a little, but I don't think enough. If you are pulled over in some places, they can check their ALPR network records and see the full history of where that vehicle has been. What if they see the vehicle has been driving around the state for longer than is legal (and you have not Registered)? No matter what, they are going to ask you where you are coming from and where you are going. They are going to ask you how long you have been in the state. What are you going to say? The smart thing to do is to not answer anything. You definitely should not lie. They know you are a PFR. If you do not answer, do you think they will find that suspcious? Will that be enough to hold you for more investigation or arrest? If you are arrested, my bet is you would be convicted.

You are very correct. Registry A**holes/Supporters/Terrorists (RASTs) want PFRs to live in fear. They want them to be harassed constantly. They work to lower the quality of life for PFRs and their families. Which is why the SEX Registries are an act of actual war and RASTs are enemies of all decent, moral Americans. They deserve direct war and consequences. I don't know about your "illegal" question. But I've seen plenty of LE officials use the excuse of tracking PFRs near schools as a key reason that we taxpayers should love and pay for ALPRs. That is their "go to" justification. Where I live, it is not illegal for PFRs to be near schools but I've heard LE here telling the public that we should support buying ALPRs because they would track PFRs driving near schools. The dumb, a**hole public loves it. I've also read very recently (floridaactioncommittee.org) that people believe there are places in Floriduh (e.g. Union County) where PFRs cannot even drive past schools (or other restricted places) or the PFR has committed a felony. We know ALPRs track vehicles there. Are the ALPRs alerting on PFR vehicles? What happens when one is alerted? Is the driver observed/verified? That can also be done automatically via the ALPR. Is the vehicle pulled over just to check if a PFR is driving it? I don't know, but it's a threat for sure.

HELP! Advice. I was convicted 01/2017, probation, finished received 1203.4 on 02/2021, move to Washington state 10/2023, classified Tier 1, moved to another part of town on 05/2026, and county controls registration. Today 05/2026, a detective stopped by to do my address verification, stated I'm a tier 2. He apologized and said, sorry took us a year to figure out your tier level. That means I will be on the website here in the state. The timing kinda works in my favor as my lease is up and i planned to move back to the side of town where I was a tier 1 (no website). I told the detective why tier 2, static 99r states i'm low offense tier 1. He said you were a position of trust. No i wasn't. PC 288.4(b)(1). I haven't committed any offenses, always registered as directed. I will lose my job, friends, and apartment... similar story to some of you... what should I do? I really can't afford an attorney, all my savings is going into my new apartment and move. My landlord will evict me if they find out. Any good attorneys in Washington (Seattle area)?

Arriving in Frankfurt early June, See Europe a little, Probably visit Croatia again, I worked there before.

Has anyone moved to another state? Way back, California DA offered plea deal Sophie’s choice: misdemeanor w registration or felony but no registration so took option 2… but now work wants to move to another state and everything I’m reading says registration would be required there. Not sure if it makes sense to temporarily bounce between states until it can be expunged

So, tell this jury what the man was convicted for, then tell them to ignore that when evaluating the facts of the case of his death as presented to them. Similar to American courts where purported curative instructions unring all bells.

Will do! 👍

We are flying to Paris next week also. If you get there first, let us know how the EES treats you at CDG. We are only in France for 4 days, then Eurostar to UK for almost 3 weeks.

Hey Steve, I was on the registry in WA for 10 years for a misdemeanor offense. When I was released from having to register, I obtained an unmarked passport. Three weeks ago I and spouse flew to Mexico (Puerta Vallarta) and spent a week. No issues coming or going. Also, I crossed the boarder four weeks before at Nogales to see if I would have issues either going or coming. No Issues. Been off the registry three years now. Good luck.

True BUT the real question is what are you gonna do about it ?

I'd not worry so much about this unless you're planning on being sketchy or looking for trouble. When I was and early PFR, I was the same, worrying about travel to other states, anxiety ridden, not able to have any fun. But that slowly faded when I realised that they aren't looking at me. They don't care, unless I make a spectacle of myself. I've been to the dreaded Florida for long weekends, Chicago, been to restaurants, bars, beaches, parks (ARGH!) Never any problem. The only time was when I drove my own car to Chicago, forgot about the ALPRs but, nothing ever happened. Just go enjoy yourself. Don't let these f**kers get you down.

You should still send out documentation so the system is updated in all the systems that could potentially flag you

Hello fellow price-club members. We need to go to Minnesota for a wedding. I read ATwoZee's chart and I also checked the statute to confirm we will not trip registration requirements by being well under the 14 day visitor limit. I did not see anything about proximity laws and distance restrictions for schools, daycare, or parks. Can anyone confirm that there are no distance restrictions for the hotel we book? Thank you.

That was my first passport, and I applied in person. If you’re off all registries you shouldn’t have any problems getting it renewed however you choose to do so, since there wouldn’t be any special handling of the passport renewal process under your situation (seems to me). I'll be in Europe late next week (Paris initially) for three weeks, and I’ll be reporting back here on my experience. .. but I'm sweating a potential jet fuel and gasoline ⛽️ shortages that could hit Europe as early as June (!) due to the Iran situation.

Why would men want to stay at a women’s shelter?

Use www.pfr.guide or justfactsnotfear.com or registranttag.org/resources/travel-matrix/ All of these have a fairly complete matrix to check current reports and known facts about destinations

Praise God!!!!!!!! That is good news!!

Great news! And it is nice to see the support in MO!

thank you for posting. Personally, and I hope that I am wrong, I do not think we have ANY allies or friends in any political party or candidates currently running for office. Just my opinion, they will not publicly say anything that would show favoritism to us at the least. :(. Especially stay out of Florida and the State of NY ) Good Luck to all

The searchable online registry is like Netflix for stalkers.

Good news outta the state of Misery.

Hi Volare and everyone, Did you apply online or paper by mail to renew your passport? Off registry and planning to renew my passport. Tips, suggestions and recommendations are greatly appreciated! Thanks!

That's awesome!