Recent Comments

I never thought Psychology Today would be used to justify one of the worst laws in modern day history. Did the justices' in favor of Smith v Doe believe the gossip papers were real news?

Florida is scorched earth whether one is on paper, off paper, off the registry in their home state, and even death won't free a person from the bondage of Florida's registry. IMO the only state that needs to know about a conviction is where it took place. Otherwise law enforcement can see if when they run your info and the public wouldn't have their undies in knots due to a false sense of security because they have a list and bought into the lies.

Does anyone here with a marked passport have experience flying into PHL airport from Europe?

I think what probably increases over time are technical violations. The laws are so difficult to comply with and restrictions are layered on regularly - it is very difficult to be administratively perfect for decades. In our case, we had CPD's approval for my son to live at his condo; it passed all restrictions. Then one day, voila! License for daycare within 490 feet we had no idea exists. He did not get arrested, but they handed him a violation paper and if they wanted to get him on something, they could have. Instead he just never went to his own home again after that morning. Just like that, a man ousted from a home he owned. Here in the US of A. People should be ashamed of these laws, I am, but most don't have the good sense to be.

It's just grandstanding to make them look tough on crime and increase their felony arrests. I haven't looked, but am willing to bet that drugs, robberies, gang activity and murders are pretty prevalent in Seminole County, and their closure rates for those crimes is likely abysmal. Sheriffs in particular probably know full well these laws don't accomplish anything, and their own jail population explains it all, if they're willing to see it (which they probably are in private, but will never acknowledge publicly). Registrants run in and out of jail over stupid registry violations all the time. But even if they have a registrant in custody accused of another actual sex crime, odds are he is perfectly, 100% registry compliant.

There's a big lie in the article, too. Recidivism rates DECREASE with time, not increase. Whomever manipulated that data is as big a liar as Collie Lee Daniel.

If you visit Florida, then could be a high probability you can be put back onto the registry despite getting off the registry and getting your rights restored in a different state. It doesn't make sense b/c if you paid for your due for a different crime, move to another state, and then put you back into jail for that crime, then it would be unconstitutional and double jeopardy. But since SCOTUS said the registry isn't punitive, but regulatory, then any state can put you back onto the registry. Which is weird b/c that means your penalty has increased from being off the registry and restored rights to being put back onto the registry and restored rights taken away. That increase in penalty has been ruled unconstitutional under Michigan v Snyder. This is something ACSOL and Janice need in their arsenal whenever they go back to SCOTUS. You get off the registry, but that only means you're off the registry in that one state. Do you have to petition off the registry from the other 49 states and territories, which includes serving time on the registry in whatever new state you go? That penalty levy is cruel and unusual, especially if you have to serve an additional 10-year term before petitioning.

Two Nashville officers were engaged in sexual activity while at a middle school, yet registrants living a law abiding life after their debt is paid aren't allowed on school property just for being on the registry based on myths and diarrhea of the mouth of lawmakers as well as law enforcement, and Arrogant Garbage.

I residing in Europe. From US California. Had my conviction for CP , misdemeanor. 15 years ago. Planing on coming back to Los Angeles for a month. What should I do once I arrive. Thank you

Do you suppose @Dustin they realize that or just are being blind to the realization they don't work but don't care because they need the political credibility for votes?

So I thought I was going to be deported, but that was removed by ICE, they deemed it not deportable (from a FOIA for my paperwork). That's when the GC expired. And after talking to a lawyer when I was released it was advised to not renew as that could trigger actions

If they're truly about what you write, then they'd be posting warnings all inside their department bldgs the dangers of LE abusing their positions of trust with minors, et al while thinking they can get away with it because they are LE in addition to the facilities minors frequent while lumping in all of the others who abuse their positions of trust. The ol' pointing one finger at ye while three point back at thee.

It's a European country, so a good one 🙂

Consult with an immigration lawyer ASAP. If you can't afford one, your state of city should have a Legal Aid organization that can help you consult with an attorney. I'm really not sure what you should do.

Georgia has had this law in place for years and - brace yourself - it hasn't made a lick of difference in terms of sex crime prevention. Just like any other obligation or restriction imposed on registrants or the registry itself.

Wow. "I agree. I mean my green card expired 10 years ago, scared to try to renew it. I was going to wait until I get off the registry and get the hell out". Good luck.

What country passport do you have?

"Your information is irrelevant to us since you’re not registered in the US, you were convicted in another country, and have a foreign passport". Who is "us"? The USA is one of 195 or so countries. And your comment is irrelevant to me.

I agree with the OP, @VOCAL. Anyone can make a video and get an email address and post on venmo.com Or a numerous of sites asking for help. Same as any other website asking for funds.

He has a dual citizenship. "I hold dual citizenship from Mexico and U.S." I assume Mexico can't not allow him to enter.

Try contacting Janice per https://all4consolaws.org/contact-us/ She is great at talking to and helping people.

Isn't beaten yet. Like a zombie it raises from the grave to try to bite our asses. DateChamberAction: 2026-06-30SenateIn committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted. per CA AB2753 | 2025-2026 | Regular Session | LegiScan

I agree. I mean my green card expired 10 years ago, scared to try to renew it. I was going to wait until I get off the registry and get the hell out

@Silence Do Good, When was his conviction date? I was always told it's your conviction date which mine was 1992 before the registry.y release date from prison was 1994 and my release from parole was 1996. So either way my registry time expired awhile ago. My original 25 years was up in 2020, before it was changed to life, either way I can get removed from the registry either by Does lll at the federal level or Petition to be removed because of Michigans Betts and Shaver rulings.

By the time they get this thing sorted out, I will be passed my 15 year conviction date where my offense is counted as a serious crime by ETIAS.

Actually Sheriff, you aren't doing no one a favor and there's nothing to be grateful about except that I don't live in a county ran by a moron like yourself 🤭

Question. Do all these restrictions apply to a PFR who is off paper and has their civil rights restored?

🇪🇺 Europe's ETIAS UPDATE!! 🇪🇺 Delayed until 2027: ETIAS drops 2026 date as launch slips out of view

Probably a good idea to get out of the USA ASAP! Don't let law enforcement catch you here because they will, without a doubt, do their best to hit you with numerous charges in order to make your life a living Hell.

It's not working, Florida! Just search "molested" or "assault" in Google news and you'll find nearly daily/weekly reports of sex offense arrests in Florida. So their legislators continue to propose these enhanced laws that aren't stopping anything - they are only (as truly intended) continuing to punish those who have already served their sentences and done their time. (Maybe the legislators should honestly address S.O. prevention in order to protect children? Maybe safe & anonymous pre-offense counseling programs. 🤷🏻‍♂️)

These Sheriffs do it because their brand is “law and order” and the government public registry scares some of their constituents when a newly released PFR moves into a community. In order to save face and promote their brand, these sheriffs are basically compelled to push for new powers. Again, the root problem of all of this drama is the stupid public registry. If it weren’t for that, no one in this town would even know some ex-con is moving near a public pool and they wouldn’t have anything to freak out about. It all comes back to the public registry. The point of a legal system is to REDUCE drama. The public registry only increases it with no benefit. This is why no other culture on earth has or has ever had one like ours. It’s pure garbage policy.

Hear hear!

I had a friend go and register. He was supposed to be completed but, the State police recalculated his time and told him it was from the date of his release and not date of conviction. Now he has 10 more years unless the Court agrees with us as he is part of the Ex post Facto Group.

These restrictions came about because the Seminole Sheriff had a problem with a registrant moving in near a swimming pool. A sheriff's job is to enforce the laws and not to run to lawmakers because their boxers are in a wad with wanting to create more problems than solutions.

Hey all. I'm an EU citizen, EU passport, and I'm in the US with a US conviction and a PFR. Now the registry does not have my EU passport data yet, as I never gave it to them (my bad on that). I'm planning on just leaving and never returning to the US

Can we revisit California Penal Code Section 1203.425 governs automatic criminal record relief (Clean Slate). Subdivision (a)(4) specifically limits public access to these dismissed court case records, preventing courts from disclosing relieved conviction information, except to the individual themselves or authorized criminal justice agencies. [1, 2, 3]. This is a 2024 law that goes a step further than 1203.4. It will grant "automatic" relief rather than having to petition to receive relief. The outcome, however, needs to be treated the same as 1203.425 where it states "preventing courts from disclosing relieved conviction information, except to the individual themselves or authorized criminal justice agencies". With that said, do we know if DOJ policies require updating entries to reflect post-conviction relief? Or whether there is any legislative history indicating how § 1203.4 dismissals should be treated on public registries.

The architect of RTAG is in the cooler, so don't even bother going to that site which is basically frozen in time.

Then why are you here? 🤔 Your information is irrelevant to us since you're not registered in the US, you were convicted in another country, and have a foreign passport.

The statistics sited in this article, reportedly provided by the Florida politician Doug Bankson(R), are from the organization "RAINN—the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network", from a study they conducted in 2009-2013. When reviewing this report, it indicates that these numbers are of "reported events or complaints". The politician, Bankson, infers that such events actually did occur and/or are undisputed. However, these numbers do NOT INCLUDE or INDICATE how many of these "reported complaints" were ultimately proven to be true in a court of law, or not. Importantly, there is no indication as to how many of these complaints were ultimately proven (definitively) to be FALSE, for whatever reason (e.g., the complainant was put up to making the complaint, as happens in divorce cases by one parent against another, or that the complaint was made with malicious intent - to gain advantage in a legal dispute, or to make financial gain or the like, etc.) Nor do the #'s reflect complaints of which the results were neither proven or disproven as to their veracity. "There are lies. Damn lies. And statistics" Samuel Clemens "If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything." Ronald Coase

EU passport and conviction in EU. The question is for all the countries for which I don't need a visa for tourism

Every minute someone is sexually assaulted and every ninth minute it's a child, but how would Rep. Bankson know this without pulling it from his butt. Maybe his electronics should be monitored Rep Plakon all registrants in Florida are considered high risk even those without a crime against a child. Too lazy to know that your own backward hillbilly state is filled with hate even when Skeletor was governor. FLORIDUH stop electing stupid people or fall into the ocean.

Do you have a US passport or an EU passport? Was your conviction in the US or EU?

That's what im thinking

How does that not violate ex post facto for existing People Forced to Register(PFR)? Are they saying that choosing where to live is not a right? What percentage of houses does this impact while in connection with the other restrictions? If over 50% of housing is non compliant, is that overly broad. Trying to wrap my mind around this legally.

The Pool and the Pools of Data  by Quiet Too Long   The new house, built of sticks and brick, stood inside the Commune of Safe, the designated destination in a new world ruled by law, where ex‑cons and registered persons were prohibited with supervision data pool protocols from crossing the boundary lines by face‑recognition systems and license‑plate readers. All travel had to be documented and confirmed through data ports in secure depots at vacation destinations, and any recent communication with certain individuals could result in denied passage until trust was verified in the pools. When a recreation pool is built, the legalities of the commune follow: safety is absolute, privacy fences must block all sightlines, and security cameras must discreetly capture any intrusion involving the young, feeding data pools meant only for their protection. Child‑proof gates must log every opening, and these pools for records are kept to ensure safety as civil law begins curfews for the young begin and the Bad Parent Registry emerges—quietly at first, then face‑forward when rebellion rises, as it always does among free Americans. Compliance will be difficult, so civil laws will expand, labeled non‑punitive even as charges become criminal for parents deemed non‑compliant under the broad term “contributing to delinquency,” a phrase that can be applied to anything once normalized. These data pools will eventually become public faced forward protocol so other parents can protect their own children and begin the avoidance, because bad parents mean bad young. And just when the system seems complete, the data pools extend to cell‑phone control issue as we all know this is a dangerous item, when these data pools are handed to the young the guard must be the parental supervision and child safety locks must be present or the parent will be liable for "contributing to"...

RTAG hasn't been updated since 2022. However, pfr.guide is still active and also has reports from people who have or have tried to travel to various countries. There's also justfactsnotfear.

Does anyone live in a country where there isn't a registry for SO? I live in an EU country, we don't have a registry, but I've always traveled inside the EU. Will I have any problem traveling to countries where I don't need a visa and I don't need to declare anything in any form? Just for context: I have a suspended sentence and I've already got a valid passport which is not stamped.

The mentality behind these laws is so flawed that you just can't fix stupid. You'd be better off trying to educate a dog on this issue. So Florida, or anywhere else that wants to be like her, go ahead and build your little invisible walls to keep certain "nasty" people out, but guess what, you will still have kids getting abused just as much as you did before, and somehow, you will be proud of yourselves anyway. People who love the Constitution and (by extension) our country will avoid following this pattern and live like liberty really matters to them. If they were wise, they would avoid places like these altogether, because, like any house of cards built on lies, it will eventually fall.

Hey all thank you for the comments! I am working to get to each one of you by phone. Please be patient as I want to give each one of you the time to tell me your story

That's the way I too, see it...

I think if you put the same article in poll on the Florida action committee site we can overtake the YES answers

They have no website. How do we know what we are donating to? [ACSOL Moderator note: SHINE does not have a website, but you can watch the video and also email questions to [email protected]]

Common sense isn't common in the state down under red tide or some kind of brain eating parasite in the state of Floriduh. Let's ban registrants of being in bathrooms since they are one flush away from entering water pipes.

Please forgive my ignorance in such matters… Are you on the public registry? If so, why would you continue living in the US if you hold Mexican citizenship and can live there? Family is all that keeps me here and that should change in the next few years when my offspring leave the nest.

Absolutely agree. While these CSI wannabees keep puffing themselves up, hoping for fame, people like Janice (who actually fight for our enduring American ideals) will be the ones who are remembered - long after the fame chasers have been forgotten and replaced.

Janice, lifetime registration restriction from section 8 has been my biggest headache of still having to register in a state I no longer live. Although I'm classified at the lowest tier 1 risk level in Massachusetts, I've been denied all federally funded senior housing because of my lifetime registration requirement in Wisconsin. Mass has plenty of senior housing and would love to get me in, but those cheese heads won't let go!

If they're a dual US/Mexico citizen, then the US can't stop them from re-entering the country. But as others said, they still need to give the 21 day notification before traveling. If they give the 21 day notification (and assuming they don't have other legal issues like an active warrant), when they return, the US wouldn't take their passport. They'll likely go to secondary inspection. It seems like most of the time, it's a pretty quick process, but they could do a more thorough interrogation, possibly take and investigate their digital devices.

Hey Janice, Apparently last year Indiana made some changes to their SORA. Those changes went into effect here on July 1st. I was informed that the changes were retroactive. So even though I had been removed from the registry back in March; I now have to once again register. I think, if I’m not mistaken, Indiana just stepped in a heaping pile of Ex Post Facto violations. I could be wrong. And if I am wrong, please let me know.

Janice, thank you for everything you are doing. Let's hope this momentum keeps up and this will be the beginning of what will end up being a very big snowball!

I suggest you go to the courthouse where you filed your paperwork and speak to the court clerk. Per a question asked on Google, "Courthouse clerks manage the administrative, financial, and record-keeping operations of the judicial system. They process legal filings, schedule hearings, maintain evidence, and assist judges in the courtroom. They also interact with the public to provide information and issue essential documents like marriage licenses."

yeah as along as you file your 21 day notice (keep a copy for yourself) you shouldn't have problems flying to Mexico with Mexican passport

Hey Jm, I got dual citizenship(Mexican passport). the 3 times I've flew to Mexico I had no problem. when checking in I use Mexican passport, when going through TSA use American passport. and when boarding the plane to Mexico show Mexican passport. on my flight back the only issues I've had so far is that I buy round trip tickets and since I check I as a Mexican for departure the app assumes I'm either a resident or visa holder and wont let me check in with my American passport. I had to go to the airport and talk to the flight workers at the counter and then I get my boarding ticket.. other than that its been smooth transactions... so good luck and hope your experience go smoothly

I'm sorry to post this here, but I cannot find another forum to do so. First off, congratulations Janice. Your ceaseless work has helped so many lives already. But I'm writing because last year when I went for my registration, the detective handling my paperwork informed me I was eligible to petition for registry removal. So I went about going to the courthouse (Los Angeles), filed my petition paperwork, and mailed a copy to the DA's office as required. I was told I would get a ruling in 6 to 12 months. It has now been 13 months, and I haven't heard anything, not even a denial. I have a copy of the stamped paperwork I filed, but no case number, and am having difficulty searching for this case online. Any and all suggestions from anyone about how to find out the result of my petition would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

@pat "Frightening and High": The Supreme Court's Crucial Mistake About Sex Crime Statistics About Sex Crime Statistics (The Ellman's) (Univ of Minn Law Library) The history is sordid (IMO) at best on it as one can read here. He was an activist justice by his record and given he knows what the high court can do for the long-term, facts don't have to matter in the end. They can make mistakes and it takes forever to overturn them in most cases.

⭐⭐ ETIAS possibly delayed.⭐⭐ Just an update for anyone watching the EU: 7/13/26 EU eyes ETIAS delay amid EES border chaos: https://etias.com/articles/eu-eyes-etias-delay-amid-ees-border-chaos

Regarding "frightening and high", I'm still trying to figure out how a magazine article was both presented to AND accepted by the Supreme Court of the United States of America as fact in direct opposition to the author, who has made it clear that his article was misrepresented and abused to create a false narrative in favor of the government's agenda to steal the constitutional protections of Americans!

Totally get what you're saying and all I can say is don't move to Florida.

This case would be an opportunistic time to to explain why the "Attorney General of Missouri who suggested early in the case that a person convicted of a sex offense is not protected by the First Amendment or any other provision in the Constitution." In Smith v Doe, 2003, the SCOTUS made the registry a civil punishment instead of a punitive punishment. It did so because they were led to believe all persons who commit sex crimes were irredeemable because SCOTUS relied on false information that the recidivism rates for sex convicts were "frightening and high" of 80%. Finally, Dr. Ira and Tara Ellman can get their academic paper introduce at the SCOTUS level, even if this case does not move forward to SCOTUS (meaning SCOTUS agrees with the lower courts that the Halloween laws are unconstitutional). It is a seed dropped to where some SCOTUS may have second thoughts about the original case as well as seeing the dissenting Judges reasonings and predictions have come to fruition.

Of course the sign is not factual. But there is so much stupid in the entirety of all the restrictions, why would anyone be concerned if the sign is accurate or not? I think it is hilarious that the criminal legislators of Misery are such a bunch of dumbf*cks that they were not intelligent enough to better specify exactly how the sign had to look and where/how it had to be displayed. They admitted in court that a PFR could make the sign on a post-it note and just put it inside the house! Anywhere. Or put it on the floor of their back porch. Actually anywhere. The dumbness is just insane. If you read the court transcripts, it will affect your brain and work to make you dumber. Beware. But out of all the illegal idiocy of their Halloween laws, I personally can't believe the kidnapping part doesn't seem to have gotten more attention. The criminal regime told their PFRs that they must remain in their homes for hours on Halloween. Unless they have a government approved excuse. That is happening in America. One of the government approved excuses is that a PFR will be at work. Some of the regime's law enforcement criminals testified in court that some PFRs actually tell the criminals in advance that they will be at work on Halloween. That is a problem. Why are PFRs helping the criminal regimes? Why are so many PFRs so eager to help the harassment and terrorism work better? Appeasing bullies only gives them legitimacy they do not deserve and it emboldens them to commit more, worse crimes. Don't feed the terrorists. I have to believe that if I lived in Misery, I would have my property completely walled off, in order to keep the criminals out always....

She’s icky and slimy. I remember Lauren Guber being gung ho and very rude. Definitely unprofessional because of her lack of concern for defendant lives (hope karma comes back two-fold). Anyway, anyone remember when the Guber would show up to court in bright pink suits? Crazy lady. Lol!

Under the Civil Rights Attorney Fees act, if a citizen successfully sues a state or local government official for violating their constitutional or civil rights, the court must order the losing government entity to pay the plaintiff's reasonable attorney's fees. Janice should submit her time sheets at a rate commensurate for an attorney with her qualifications and the state should pay. It's not millions, but it's something.

This is distorted thinking I would urge you to challenge your viewpoint. The government does regulate intimate associations when it comes to close family relatives based on biology. Incest laws prohibit sexual contact or marriage between close relatives. While regulations vary by state, they generally ban unions between lineal relatives, siblings, and extended relations. These laws exist to prevent genetic defects in offspring, protect family harmony, and prevent the exploitation of power imbalances within households.

"I’m sorry but it can’t be the last time you explain this." Uh, yes it can be. The change of address to Europe meant nothing except that he moved out of the US. Why why why must you not understand???

Got it, ty.

Let's hope for a positive outcome in Michigan -- with regard to ex post facto and punitive issues -- and that outcome can be applied to our situation here in CA.

Missouri's cert petition repeatedly calls the Halloween sign ("No candy or treats at this residence") a "factually accurate" disclosure. They argue it is true because the law prohibits "participating in Halloween". but the statute does not prohibit possession of candy or treats, yet the sign declares they are not present. Even if one isn't "participating in Halloween", but they have a cookie in their pantry, the sign is false. Doesn't this undermine Missouri's "just factual" claim and strengthen the compelled speech argument?

Actual data is the bonus after the author of the article which that statement is attributed to debunked it themselves.

The Florida action committee is getting ready to file a massive lawsuit and could use your help, if you have ever avoided visiting Florida because of the registry or ever visited Florida. You know what the requirements are like. Anyway impact statements are very welcome https://floridaactioncommittee.org/fac-weekly-update-2026-07-14-preparing-for-a-historic-legal-challenge/

AND that the recidivism rate is "frightening and high". This is so easily debunked by using actual data. Why is nobody correcting them on this?

My fiance was also "Tier 1" (no public disclosure) under the old law. SB384 put him in the highest Tier 3 with full address disclosure. His offense itself would still be a Tier 1 (no public disclosure) and under SORNA, it is not even a registrable offense at all. It is the Static-99R bogus risk score that put him in Tier 3. His score has been the same forever, even before the new law. Yet, he was never public regardless of his score. They just added this ridiculous stipulation with the new law. All of a sudden, he is in the highest Tier when for decades, he was not listed on the public shaming site. How can that be explained in a logical way? Wait, there is no logic when it comes to the registry. Mind boggling, ridiculous and absolutely unacceptable. Ruining people's lives decades after they have served their time and paid their dues. Restraints and disabilities get added at a whim, depending on how the wind blows?

It seems annoying that you must do work before SCOTUS even agrees to look at the case. Surely SCOTUS has better and more important things to do than deal with thoroughly idiotic issues being pushed from a fascist, criminal regime. Nothing more important going on than Halloween signs? That's a 1% issue? Although, in fairness, protecting citizens from fascist criminals is actually very important. But as I've said before, I do think the fascists should have to compensate citizens that are forced to defend themselves. Misery should be forced to pay you and ACSOL a lot. Compensatory and punitive damages. They should also be forced to pay any and all PFRs ever affected. I suppose that is what a class action suit is about. But payouts should be a given/requirement when a fascist, criminal regime is told that they cannot enforce an illegal "law". The regime should be forced to hand out damages. The State of Misery, and other criminal regimes, should be forced to maintain very large funds which are used every single day to fund groups like ACSOL (ACLU, etc.), for the purposes of challenging any of their illegal activities. That fund should be active always. The criminals are terrorists who cannot be trusted. Americans should have easier ways to fight them off.

"AG" == Arrogant Garbage I like that. Probably accurate most of the time. I suspect the AG job is like law enforcement in that it attracts good people, but also very, very much the worst of the worst. We need for good people to win and keep the scum Registry A**holes/Supporters/Terrorists out and marginalized. I will use "Arrogant Garbage (AG) Catherine Hanaway".

More people here and everywhere should understand that @Kenny

Since when is harm legal and constitutional? Just because they do what you wrote, does that mean it's constitutional?

SCOTUS has not agreed to grant review in this case. So far, the AG filed a petition on July 6 requesting review. We have an initial 30 days to reply but will request an additional 30 days to do what needs to be done. That means our reply will actually be due right after Labor Day.

Could be worse! I was Tier One (as it was commonly understood in CA) for 23 years, no re-offending, nothing. SB384 comes along and puts certain "Tier One" offenses like mine into -- wait for it -- Tier 3!

I should go copy right my name and sue for them using my name without consent

First and foremost, thank you for all you have done and are a part of the important changes we need in getting the registry and the related damaging initiatives stopped!!! It is time for the 2003 ruling that indicated the registry was not punishment to be addressed. THanks to you and the many of us working in some way, this is going to happen!!! n

Supposedly Grenada is safe for us according to the travel sites. I think there is a traveler warning for potential violent crime from the state department. Pretty much, don’t be dumb

I don't see that it makes any difference if a person is a former-PFR vs PFR. If a government can make any visitor (e.g. a current PFR) sign up for their Registry, then I really don't see why they couldn't force anyone else sign up. The fact that state A calls a person a PFR or not doesn't have to matter at all to state B. State B can call whomever they like that. Don't some states still have laws which say the effect of "if you have ever been convicted of crime X, then you must Register?" Are those states being forced to "assess the danger" of people to whom that applies? I don't think so. So why would it matter if a new state resident or visitor currently had to Registry anywhere else or not? The state can just say you must. You said, "I believe there would be harm towards ..." There is definitely harm. But if that harm is legal for a PFR, seems like it is legal for a former-PFR (or anyone else) also.

Nah. People should stop playing into big government's lies and propaganda that they have any clue at all about who is dangerous and who is not. Stop worrying about what the Registry A**holes/Supporters/Terrorists (RASTs) say or care about "tiers". They are lying terrorists. I mean, there are obvious people who are dangerous, but so what. We know that the SEX Offense Registries do absolutely nothing to even slightly help hinder anyone from committing a SEX crime. So why are people pretending that some people should be listed on it and others not? Listing a person on the Regstries makes them more dangerous. Personally to me, if a person accepts that Registries are okay to exist, then I want that person listed on the Registries. As long as Registries exist, every single American must suffer consequences (and does). We should identify, ally with, and protect people who are anti-Registry. But everyone else, surely over 100 million, must suffer worse consequences. Every single American does already suffers consequences from the Registries daily, but we should try to direct that as much as possible to the RASTs.

Legislating away constitutional rights has become the easiest form of politics. Instead of creating policies that actually improve public safety, some lawmakers keep proposing laws that test the limits of the Constitution. Whether you like someone or not is irrelevant the Bill of Rights applies to everyone. If we allow constitutional protections to be ignored for one group today, it becomes easier to ignore them for another tomorrow. We must keep up the battle or our rights will be eroded away.

Heroes get remembered, but legends never die. Misery's AG (Arrogant Garbage) and other AGs try being heroes for the sake of looking tough on crime by throwing the book to see what sticks, while Janice is a legend that fights for registrants and their families which is more admirable IMO. May the momentum continue to grow and eventually take the registry and sex offense laws/restrictions to the dump where they belong.

Thank you, Janice! I am new to the fight and appreciate you and all the others dedicated to this cause. I’m hoping to assist in making change here in Florida!

No, she isn't saying that...read the next to last paragraph.

I'm sorry but it can't be the last time you explain this. New people just convicted of sex offenses are going to see recent comments you make where you just say "go travel to SEA and enjoy your life" without knowing you've previously explained that you changed your address to Europe and assume that one can successfully travel to SEA without having done something or having some special circumstance. I'm also not sure why just changing your address to Europe would work. I'm happy for you that it did, but if you're still using your US passport at border control, they would still see the IML marker. Unless you have a second passport? Even then, I think at least in some cases your US record would still show up at border control if you use your second passport. That's definitely the case for the Five Eyes countries. I never said, nor do do I think, that you lied.

I understand your concerns, and that passport stamp would also give me pause about traveling to SEA. But to be fair, Cambodia Law on Tourism encourages travelers not to participate in child trafficking & sexual exploitation while inside their kingdom. It says nothing about previous offenses that a traveler had committed in their home country. So it's reasonable to believe the OP has no problem crossing their border with his marked passport. Personally, I wouldn't take that chance. The Doc is too old and needs his meds 🤭 to take that gamble to stay in a Cambodia jail.

Last time saying........no tricks, no schemes, no payoffs, no who knows who. Go to new country respect the people, obey the laws. Oh...I never *lied* to anyone. I did a change of address to Europe. As a matter of fact I tried to submit the 20 day notice of international travel and they (agency) would not accept it because I was "moving". I think it better if you just stay in the USA. Good luck

LOL, ok, don't go to SEA then. Suit yourself.

Janice, are you saying the SCOTUS has accepted this case?