OR: Supreme Court to consider – Is it ‘cruel and unusual’ to imprison public masturbator for life?

____ ____ is serving a life prison sentence — but not because, like many in that situation, he killed someone.

____, 69, has repeatedly exposed his genitals in public with sexual intent. In 2012, after a Marion County jury found him guilty of that conduct again, a judge sentenced him to life without any hope of being released. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

On Oregon Supreme Court….I knew this guy……Been reading everything CA RSOL for almost two years now. Read this article a few days ago .Was shocked to read about someone I haven’t seen for over twenty years. Here’s a personal story about the times I knew that person, who went by the name of Mike.
In 1987 I was a year into my weekly outpatient sex offender treatment program in Portland, Oregon. We were all required to do something socially where no children would be present. I choose Ballroom Dancing and was doing well with it when the program director assigned Mike to me who was also in the program to get him into dancing. Mike really took to it. He eventually got a girlfriend who danced too. They stayed together till she died of ovarian cancer many years later of which I just found out.
I finished the program, got off probation, and moved away only to return to Portland some years later. I contacted Mike’s girlfriend, and she let me stay in an extra room in her house. She lived south of Portland in a rural town. Mike lived apart in his apartment some twenty miles away close to Portland. They saw each at least weekly.
Things stayed this way and I was comfortable living like this. But then it happened: The police called his girlfriend at home one morning. Mike was in jail out on the Oregon coast and wanted her to bring some things he needed.
It was news: An entire beach community was in shock of the young child kidnapped off the beach in broad daylight including the father quickly finding them and Mike getting badly beaten.

I’m telling this because It deeply affected me. Here I am a convicted child molester, but I was “cured”; it had been years since my first and only offense. Yet there’s Mike. This is his SECOND offense and a particularly gruesome one at that !
Over the ensuing months his girlfriend stood by his side through courts, bail, sentencing, and prison. I hated this guy for what he did, and disliked her for helping him, but I kept my feelings to myself, and reluctantly helped as little as I could.
Finally, the local paper in the rural town where she (and me) lived did an article about Mike staying with us before going to prison. That, and a few other things, and I left taking all my hypocracy with me. I never saw or talked with them again. That was the mid 1990’s.
Those were the times I knew Mike. I never re offended , but in reading the recent article he did. Does that make me better?

Gerald, thank you very much. Hank.