I feel compelled to respond to Chandler McCorkle’s guest opinion (“Judge failed rape victim, society,” Daily Camera, Aug. 14) because it proceeds from woefully erroneous assumptions about the nature of sex offense probation and sentencing. Ms. McCorkle states that the sentence means that sex offender probationary sentences do not carry “true repercussion(s),” and the judge’s sentence was “naïve [and] unthinkably stupid.” With all due respect, she could not be more wrong. Full Opinion Piece Original Opinion Piece
Read MoreThursday, December 26, 2024
Recent posts
- TX: HB 1401 would require any educator convicted of such offenses to register as a sex offender
- ACSOL Online Meeting January 18, 2025
- Vigilantism and the Sex Offender Registry
- CA Survey: Are you affected by PC 4571 (stay away from people in custody)?
- U.S. Sentencing Commission Seeks Comment on Proposals to Promote Public Safety and Simplify Federal Sentencing
