ACSOL to Lobby Newly Elected State Legislators – Jan 30/31, 2017

The Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws (ACSOL) will lobby newly elected state legislators in Sacramento on January 30 and 31.  Training will be provided to registrants, family members and supporters who lack lobbying experience on January 30 at 9 a.m. at 1215 K Street, 17th Floor.  Those with lobbying experience will begin meetings in the offices of the newly elected legislators on the same date and at the same time in the State Capitol.  Additional details regarding these activities will be provided on this website in January 2017.

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Good luck and God speed.

I still think these lawmakers should be notified on the record that they are violating our rights under color of law and with malice and with reckless disregard for the truth in deriliction of their official duties so are therefore not immune to legal action against them for not only criminal negligence but also for monetary damages caused by their actions that are and will continue to cause me irreparable deleterious harm including pain and suffering, loss of wages, damaged property, and damage to our reputation and any future earnings…then we need to follow thru with a lawsuit for damages and code of ethics violations as well as prosecution for the abuse of power under color of law…

I hope we can get the politicians to remove the STATIC-99/R from any future laws. As some have rightfully said, the STATIC ought only be used for parole/probation supervision for the first 5-years. The STATIC ought never be used for anything else. The STATIC should NOT especially be used to determine whether one should register for LIFE. The STATIC is a very limited “tool.” CASOMB and SARATSO has been very dishonest about what the STATIC can and can’t do. And I hope this organization puts some intellectual thought and research into showing why using the STATIC will cause a slippery slope.

Would be a great experience. But what about those that have to work on those days?

I am missing some important information here, maybe just because I’m ignorant….but the address listed in the post, ( on K street, 17th floor, etc.), that’s in Sacramento or LA? I live in the SF Bay Area and could even travel to Sacramento to help with lobbying efforts or ?. However travel to LA area for training and then Sacramento for lobbying is beyond my resources right now. So if anyone could enlighten me it would be much appreciated, thanks.
Lobby Looking