UT: Wasatch prosecutor warns Utah senators he’s coming after them for sex-offender vote

The Utah Legislature approved a bill this past session giving judges more sentencing discretion in cases in which a defendant had consensual sex with a minor under age 14 if that defendant is under 21.

The measure passed the House 42-31 and the Senate 15-11. Gov. Gary Herbert signed it into law. It changes slightly the mandatory-minimum requirement of 25 years to life and a lifetime listing on the sex-offender registry for having sex with a minor.

But it now has a deputy in the Wasatch County attorney’s office gunning for two senators who voted for the bill and whose districts include parts of his county. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

A Very ugly king (molok)*, demigod, & lord (baal)

“A constituent who became aware of the email has complained to the Utah elections office because King’s email came from a Wasatch County attorney’s office account. State law bars the use of government resources for political purposes or to influence the outcome of an election.

King told me (in an email from his personal account), that he sent the email just to the two senators, not to the public. It went out after the election, he noted, so there was no attempt to sway an outcome. Even so, he said, he regrets sending it on a government email account.

Wasatch County Attorney Scott Sweat said the email was not authorized by his office and does not reflect the county attorney’s position. Sweat did, however, formally oppose the bill.”

* https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moloch

I believe kings incorrect conduct is A Violation of The Public’s Trust in all it’s scenes.

As Yehovah Lives, so should we

King is old enough to know better than to send those emails on the county computer. If he thinks young adults need to ALL be PUNISHED SEVERELY, same goes to to him. You messed up King and now it’s time to pay for it the rest of your miserable life. Put him on A Registry and leave him there. No sorrys!

good God being a registered citizen aside– how did this sentencing ever become a rational outcome:

” mandatory-minimum requirement of 25 years to life and a lifetime listing on the sex-offender registry for having sex with a minor.”

And on top of it we have a psycho prosecutor going rogue on two state legislators for voting to allow a presiding magistrate judicial discretion based upon the facts and evidence.

I think there should be a registry for psychopaths, and this prosecutor would be on it

Just more evidence that the registry is a “Bill of Attainder” when there is proof like this that Senators that try to reduce something that is too harsh and not based on real rehabilitation and reintegration goals are going to be attacked and threatened with bad publicity.

Why shouldn’t judging be left to the judges and not mandatory one-size-fits-none punishments dictated by politicians that ignore the constitution?

It’s clear that this prosecutor has no respect for the very laws he is sworn to uphold. For this reason, there should be no leniency: termination from job, lifetime ban from the internet, and lifetime registration for internet offenses. We’ll teach these internet deviants a thing or two, by God!