Please join me and attorney Chance Oberstein for our very first telephone version of the live monthly meetings we have in various cities around California.
The conference call will be on Saturday, August 12 at 10 am Pacific Time (1:00 Eastern) and will last from 2 to 3 hours.
This is separate from the topic conference calls, which we will still have. We are doing this in the hope that far more registrants–including those outside California–will attend.
Topics of conversation include information about ACSOL’s advocacy as well as current topics and pending legal action.
Please Show up, Stand up, and Speak up!
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055
Conference Code: 983459
This will be recorded and available on our website www.all4consolaws.org
I look forward to having you call in.
Sincerely,
Janice
I hope to participate, looking forward to it.
I’ll be on vacation with the family, so no way I can call in though I’d really like to.
If anyone else could bring up a topic, I would like to know the lawyers’ thoughts on a challenge to freedom of speech based on Packingham to how the government provides our email addresses to social networks just so they can ban us. Just like IML providing our info to other countries that just ban us, this should also be a violation of Substantive Due Process.
After all, in both situations the judiciary is not declaring we are too dangerous to travel to other countries or use social networking during the fair sentencing portion of the trial, which is when the judiciary has the task assigned ONLY to them to punish, rehabilitate, and PROTECT THE PUBLIC from those convicted. NOT the legislature.
In both situations, another government or a social networking site isn’t going to spend the time, money, and resources to determine our level of dangerousness every time, when our own government didn’t do it just ONE time during trial. They have no reasonable alternative but to ban us all based on the lowest common denominator of a repeat child predator being somewhere on our “list”.
Packingham was really big for us, and should translate into arguments to affect all this. Between the Justices specifically noting the “troubling” way restrictions go on past the end of the length of supervision determined by the judiciary and therefore over-ridden by legislature with sex offender laws, and how they recognized the extreme importance of social media to those trying to re-integrate with society, I think we have a solid foundation to build on.
If anyone could get their opinions on this, it would be greatly appreciated.
Kind of scary that they are looking into ammend CP. Its not something I am proud of but was able to determine my shortcomings and reasons behind it. I hope it sticks to tier 1.
Does anyone know when SB 421 will be heard?
Listened to the call. All the way from Missouri. Thanks for speaking up. I have written my statesman and govenor. I hope it makes a difference.