A new scarlet letter for harassment charges (Editorial)

Admin

In an effort to encourage a more equitable system of justice in this country — something to which any number of legislators, unprincipled prosecutors and judges seem opposed — I believe it would be in our best interest to treat all those charged with sexual harassment and sexual misconduct the same way we treat all sex offenders. Full Editorial

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The first half of that had me going and a bit pissed off. Took me a bit to realize the sarcasm. Good article if people will take the time to read to the end

0
Reply

Yeah, as I was reading it, I was thinking…this has GOT to be sarcasm, but then I had an inkling of doubt because it’s Florida. My original feeling was confirmed about midway through. Good article.

0
Reply

He could have been a bit more obvious by naming it the “Sexual Harassment and Misconduct Registry,” or SHaMR (long A, for effect).

0
Reply
View Replies (3)

If politicians and celebrities started feeling the pinch then things would change, the registry would disappear, that is what he is saying.

0
Reply

I actually wish they would be added to the registry. It would bloat the registry tremendously to where it’s obvious to the general public that it’s not effective, and with who have the money and motivation to help us get this thing abolished!

0
Reply

Noon the rid party…put em up on the Fed sister! Let All that visit the site…and the media will run with the infamous peeps on there!
Why not, we are…decades later. Test them unfairly mark them for Life just like I’LL!
Thanks Obama for being an Attorney and NOT considering the implications NOR READ ALL the details in the bill you signed before leaving

0
Reply