Craigslist Shuts Down Personals Section After Congress Passes Bill On Trafficking

You can still find furniture or a roommate on Craigslist. But ads seeking romance or sexual connections are no longer going to be available, after Craigslist took down the “personals” section Friday for its U.S. site.

The company says it made the change because Congress has passed the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, meant to crack down on sex trafficking of children. It was approved by a landslide in the Senate earlier this week, as NPR’s Alina Selyukh has reported, but has been met with criticism by free speech advocates and sex workers.

As Craigslist wrote, the law seeks “to subject websites to criminal and civil liability when third parties (users) misuse online personals unlawfully.” Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

However, Ads seeking romance or sexual connections are still available on Craigslist’s International Websites. The problem is obviously an RSO cannot travel to utilize any of those romance connection services.

The most concerning sentence in this law is this:

“The amendments apply regardless of whether alleged conduct occurs before, on, or after this bill’s enactment.”

This is entirely new territory in US jurisprudence. Never before has the state been able to imprison you for something which wasn’t a crime when you committed it. That is a tenet which is (was) at the core of our justice system. Previously, there is no way anyone could possibly be punished ex-post facto like this, (apart from the so-called “administrative-not-punitive” SO laws) but times are changing. With this administration anything is possible.

Correction: That law is not seeking to crackdown on CHILD sex traffickers, it is targeting ALL sex traffickers, it says nothing about children specifically; I’ve read it.

And don’t forget, under the change of legal definition, sex trafficking is not that, it is simply prostitution. And by law it is now always “trafficking” no matter the circumstances, and the woman is always a victim, the man is the trafficker, even if all the solicitation is by the woman and the man merely finally relents and says OK. By law, women now are exempt from prosecution, as they are now always defined as victims.

So, this is not targeting even actual trafficking as anyone thinks that to be. This is targeting misdemeanor prostitution, and only the men. Which isn’t surprising, as it was pushed by the women’s movement.

Oh no! What are law enforcement and advocacy groups going to do now when they need to pad their stats?