FL: A National Push For Victims’ Rights is Now Hitting Florida. But Critics Are Fighting Back

[injusticetoday.com]

Voters in Florida may soon get to decide whether to give victims of crime a bigger say in the criminal justice system.

A proposed amendment to the state constitution known as Marsy’s Law for Florida would enshrine specific rights for crime victims, such as the right to privacy and the “right to be reasonably protected from the accused.” It would also give victims legal standing to testify during hearings to determine a defendant’s bail, sentencing, plea deals and parole.

“The pain a victim suffers in the aftermath of a crime is hard enough without being revictimized by the criminal justice system,” said Senator Lauren Book of Broward County, herself a victim of sexual abuse as a child and now an advocate for Marsy’s Law for Florida. “Marsy’s Law will give each victim the promise of having their voice heard.”

On February 20, Senator Book and Pasco County, Florida Sheriff Chris Nocco introduced the amendment, which would add victims’ rights language to Florida’s constitution. According to the campaign, it would create “enforceable constitutional protections, the same level that is afforded to those accused and convicted, nothing more and nothing less.” If the Florida Constitution Revision Commission approves the amendment, it will be placed on the 2018 general election ballot, where it requires 60 percent approval by voters to be added to the state constitution.

 

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“A proposed amendment to the state constitution known as Marsy’s Law for Florida would enshrine specific rights for crime victims, such as the right to privacy and the “right to be reasonably protected from the accused.”

Literally the absolute opposite for all of us.

Why don’t they just put the offender on a cross and let the victim hammer in the nails…Geez!!

Sounds like the beginning of the end of America, disguised as a cute bill, as if ‘victims’ don’t already have enough representation and protection in this country… As if the people going to prison or dealing with the repercussions of the justice system aren’t victims as well. Why is this country all about Dividing groups of people? It seems to get worse every year.

If this in any way changes a defendant’s right to a fair trial, I doubt it will survive judicial scrutiny. If (read: When) the lemming-citizenry approve it, you can expect the first case subjected to it will get appealed to SCOTUS. As the other article recently posted on here (“NY: OUTDATED IDEAS ABOUT VIOLENT CRIME HURT VICTIMS AND TRAP OFFENDERS”) points out, crimes are against the State, not a person. If that’s the case, why should a person get to have this exclusive and biased input at every single stage? This is especially troubling at bail (i.e. prior to a conviction!). Since when is a victim part of the adversarial prosecution-defense system of our courts? This is so screwed up, it’s ridiculous. But once again, “it’s Florida.” Banana Republic.

“A proposed amendment to the state constitution known as Marsy’s Law for Florida would enshrine specific rights for crime victims, such as the right to privacy and the “right to be reasonably protected from the accused.” It would also give victims legal standing to testify during hearings to determine a defendant’s bail, sentencing, plea deals and parole.”

Don’t victims already have their voices heard? I don’t think a victim should have the right to dictate how to run a court proceedings- bail amount? parole time? sentencing? plea deals? Might as well have the victim sit in as judge and jury!

I am losing all faith that this will ever get over turned. They continue to pile on more and more. I believe it is time to begin forming a militia. We need to begin defending ourselves against these attacks. Our constitution guarantees us specific rights. If we do not stand up and fight in a way that our enemies will listen, then we only have ourselves to blame.

It is sometimes obvious there is a victim of a crime and efforts should be made to comfort and remediate the pain, but it is up to the court to decide who is the perpetrator. This law subverts that process and makes the presumption before the trial. In some cases the accuser is simply lying. Accusee or accusor, that is what they are without the evidence yet presented. If we assume sometime the accused is innocence, then does not she or he deserve to be comforted and feel secure? After all the accused faces the potential violence from the state, which prison is or even death. If these bills were presented basically for what they are, as accuser rights bills, the popular support would wane.