General Comments April 2018

Comments that are not specific to a certain post should go here, for the month of April 2018. Contributions should relate to the cause and goals of this organization and please, keep it courteous and civil.

Related posts

316 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

And here I never thought I would quote the Orange Clown. But he has a point…. perhaps not the one that needs to be made.

“Governor Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown pardoned 5 criminal illegal aliens whose crimes include (1) Kidnapping and Robbery (2) Badly beating wife and threatening a crime with intent to terrorize (3) Dealing drugs. Is this really what the great people of California want?”

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/980065427375128576

Pardons to date, by ANY California Governor, of people required to register pursuant to PC 290: 0 (Zero).

Really! Is this really what the great people of California want? Apparently so.

Someone threw marbles at my house this evening and broke 2 of my windows. Previously my car windshield was broken, my lawn (dead grass) was set on fire and a flaming newspaper was thrown on my porch. Got to love that vigilante list we’re on. Definitely not punishment.

Gov. Edmund G. Brown Jr. on Friday announced that he has granted 56 pardons and 14 commutations.

No sex offenses again.

http://www.lakeconews.com/index.php/news/55248-gov-brown-grants-executive-clemency-in-70-cases

I was wondering if Janice or anyone else could comment a little about what happens to elderly registrants if they are in the hospital on their registration date or otherwise disabled, bed-ridden or in a care facility and they can no longer physically show up to register. surely this is the case with some people. How do they handle it and how do the authorities handle it. If you are in a hospital, confined to bed or otherwise incapacitated, how long before they come for you? And are family members who can’t find a way to transport you also criminally liable for harboring a failure to register person.

The best way to attack the entire structure of the registry in all states.

1. Get it ruled out by SCOTUS

2. Attack the funding, by somehow getting the US debt, and Spending out there to show the public how they way over spend on things such as the registry, that are a complete waste of tax payers money.

US debt over 20 trillion now.
DOJ budget just on grants to states for a list of items including SMART 3.9 billiion

I do fully fatham the huge amount between 3.9b and 20t but it would sure help, and then maybe they would look at other spending as well to see if that spending is really needed.

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-how-the-us-got-to-20-trillion-in-debt-2017-03-30
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-fy-2019-budget-request

I’m wondering how IML will apply to me. I was a RSO in California, but I moved out of the USA in early 2016 before IML was fully implemented. I am now a permanent resident in another country. California had no reporting requirement at the time so my passport is still valid and since I am no longer a RSO, the way I read the law my passport will not be cancelled. I am just wondering how it will work if I ever decide to visit the U. S. in the future. I think I would have to register as a transient if I were in California for example for 5 days. So what if I left California or any other jurisdiction before the time period to register? And how about the 21 day notification that I am leaving for a foreign country? What if I am only visiting for 2 weeks? How can I give 21 days notice, plus I am not a resident of the US anyway? Does any one have experience on that type of situation?

Can someone provide me with an update on the lawsuit against IML? Thanks.

Keep telling them about how much money they’re wasting on the registry and they should abolish it because of money and they will start making us pay for it, probably start at 2 to 500 a day, week, month or whatever, that’s what I think would be the outcome, why not make the pervererts pay for it, I know messed up but it could happen, I know other states make registratents pay for this bs.

F all people who support the Registries. They are not Americans. They are not our fellow citizens. Do everything legal, every single day, to make them pay. Do not miss one day.

Happy Easter! But not to the Registry Terrorists, F them.

Hello Group,

Just wanted to announce that a Federal Lawsuit has been filed in Texas challenging the Registry. There are 7 John Doe’s in this lawsuit. All had probation or prison of some sort, two of the John Doe’s go back to the 70’s and were added to the registry years later. This has been filed two weeks ago. Here is the Case number 3:18-cv-00629-G. Lets hope and pray that this makes it through the first round. We know Texas will do everything in its power to have it dismissed …. but with Colorado, Michigan and Pennsylvania and some previous case law we know we have a good shot. I am one of the John Doe’s… Please pray, if we can get a win out of federal court and we know Texas will appeal to the 5th. Lets knock this out of the ball park.
You want to contact me directly you may. I will check back later this afternoon going for a Easter lunch.

Can anyone provide recommendations or guidance in regards to answering ads for roommate wanted.
I have apartment, but is the absolute worst part of west San Jose. 90% of the block is on welfare or housing assistance. Druggies, illegal gang members, unemployed drunks. A real dump!
I want to move to a nicer area, but obviously bay area rentals are sooo expensive, and trying to save as much as I can to move overseas within 2-3 yrs.
I am stressed about the prospect of “exposing” my past, or worse, having the goon squad show up for a residency check. I have been off probation for a few months and am having reduction processed, but that does little to quell the daily anxiety I feel.
If anyone has experience in this area, such as how to deal with the questions and such, please let me know. I am so depressed from waking up every day and not knowing if my life will ever get better. 3 yrs seems like forever when you’re alone and hated.

This is grounds of the suit.

Count I: Violation of The Due Process Clause (Stigma Plus)
Count II: Violation of The Due Process Clause (Right to Travel)
Count III: Violation of The Due Process Clause (Work)
Count IV: Violation of The First Amendment
Count V: Violation of The Due Process Clause
(Vagueness, Impossibility and Strict Liability)
Count VI: Violation of The Equal Protection Clause
Count VII: Violation of The Ex Post Facto Clause
Count VIII: Violation of the Eighth Amendment
Count IX: Violation of Double Jeopardy
Count X: Violation of the U.S. Constitution Contracts Clause
Lack of Legal Remedy

There is no inactive registry. If I look up my name in the national registry, it does not appear. Passports are revoked after you give notification that you are travelling internationally and Homeland Security notifies the State Dept. that you are RSO that is about to travel. You have to be currently registered in order for your passport to be revoked.

I always found this to be interesting because once you have left the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, then where you go and where you stay and what you eat is really not legal information you actually have to provide. They do this to call wherever you are going to alert the police as to your hotel and crap so the abuse can further continue from harassment.

Anyone who’d like to decrease the data their ISP gets on them should check out https://1.1.1.1, a new DNS server that went public yesterday. They purge records every 24 hours, and have even enlisted Price Waterhouse Cooper to audit them to ensure they’re purging things. By changing your default DNS servers to these new ones (1.1.1.1 and 1.0.0.1), you can slow some data mining of your searches and visits.

I changed my router’s DNS servers to it Sunday afternoon, and have had zero issues. Can’t even tell there’s a difference.

See also: https://cleantechnica.com/2018/04/02/cloudflare-1-1-1-1-internet-privacy-tool-is-no-april-fools-joke/

AJ asked me to pass along this Texas case so here it is.
https://gofile.io/?c=9M5KZK
Kind of weak but at least it touches on some good issues. Kind of amazing how all these other cases are coming about now that I have filed mine, I know it is just coincidence and just happens to be occurring at the same time but no one else has challenged all the violations at once as-applied as I have. I really dislike these class action attempts, there is to broad a heterogeneous class of individuals to attack these laws as class actions. Class actions are for facial challenges and there is no way that these laws are going to be shot down on facial challenges since a facial challenge requires that there is no circumstances where the law in question would be constitutional. Very high bar and about the only thing that can get shot down on a facial is for over-broad of vagueness. Other than that, good luck and it just creates bad precedents.

Actually after reading that case a little more it is not half bad but I just cringe at the “and similarly situated individuals,” but it does focus on these 7 individuals so hey it might work.

So, I was making my coffee this morning and was thinking, dangerous proposition for me in the morning, and here is my thought.
Of all the laws that have been passed, what is the percentage of SO laws that have been passed in relation to other crimes? If justice is to be equal, why is the law not equal?
I know that this issue was and has been addressed, but looking at it from another angle, I hope you see where I am going.
A lawmaker/politician creating an exorbitant amount of laws against a class of individuals shows, and numbers never lie, how politicians have used us as a class in a “gerrymandering “ way. It’s not republican or democrat or a party gerrymandering per se. But a gerrymandering of legal and law making means.
I have read and followed this group for a few years and I am very grateful for everyone. I do not know where I would be without it. I know I am a stronger person. I have not seen or read a challenge to the registry that includes an argument of this manner. If there is, I would be the first to say”my bad”. Lol.
Anyway, good morning.

I can’t believe this.

This Texas federal lawsuit talked about above is much worse than I thought.

Look here at all the comments from Texas Voices, Texas attorney Richard Gladden, Janice, and others:

https://floridaactioncommittee.org/texas-law-firm-solicits-registrants-in-florida/

This lawyer that is filing the big Texas class action is the same one that was flooding Florida residents telling them to give her firm in Texas money to get off the Florida registry.

I don’t have time right now to paste all the crazy stuff from here. Please go read all the comments and let me know what you thing. I’ll try to be back on here in a few hours if I can. I’ve never seen something that could be this bad in a long long time. This lawyer is NOT working well with ANYONE outside of herself.

I knew the case was completely weak and a he said she said conclusory and anecdotal gibberish but was trying to stay positive. On further review I totally agree this so called attorney is praying on SO’s and has filed a brief that could set back and totally end any future chances of litigation in the Texas districts. I would not be surprised if this women is not receiving funds from both registrants and the gov in some way to thwart our attempts at relief. Class actions will not ever win, on top of that if the attorney thought there was a chance in hell of winning she would be doing it pro bono and demanding attorney fees from the state as Janice does in her suits. The lady provides no empirical evidence, no facts and attempts to cover all “similarly situated” individuals. There is no way it can prevail. This is basically a facial challenge and will never survive. I really hope W.A.R. is rethinking their plans to file a class action as well….

Well people, here is what I sent that so called attorney. I know it will not make a difference but what the helllll…

I am writing you from CA and am very concerned on your class action (along with “many” others) with your conclusory and anecdotal over-broad class action. You provide no empirical evidence, no documented facts or instances, and absolutely no case law backing your claims. You are doing a great disservice to registrants and their families which will have lasting negative effects on any future litigation for years to come. This is one of the most disgraceful and weak brief I have ever seen in my life and you should be ashamed of yourself for not doing your due diligence before ever filing such a incompetent suit. I am not an attorney but I have extensive experience and hundreds if not thousands of hours researching and studying this subject as I am a registrant in CA and have filed my own suit in federal court and suggest you take note of how it is done. Your case has a zero chance of prevailing and I am sure you are either aware of this fact or you are disingenuous and down right duplicitous or incompetent. If you have any scruples at all you will pull this class action and do your research and collaborate with others and take note on how the attorneys in the Snyder case used empirical evidence and facts by doing their homework before filing an as-applied challenge, which is the only way to win on these cases. Here is one of my Pro Se filings that makes yours pale in comparison. You should feel ashamed that a Pro Se litigant can supersede your filing by an order of magnitude.
Thank you for your time.

Than I linked her to my Objections which like I stated smashes hers by an order of magnitude….

Look at this people, how is this vague??? There is absolutely nothing vague about the requirements stated.

210. The parts of TSORP 2017 that are void for vagueness, that are impossible to comply with, or that wrongly impose strict liability include but are not limited to:
• the requirement to report changes in personal data within seven days;88
• The requirement to maintain a driver’s license or state personal identification card with the current address;89 and
• The requirement to report the temporary address of any location in which an individual visits three times a month for more than 48 hours.9

Am I missing something??? How is the following and equal protection issue????

The state of Texas is treating John Doe #3 similarly to other sex offenders on its sex offender registry by allowing his information to be publicly disseminated over the Internet.

Hmmmm.?????

She never even made a punishment argument but states…

Count VII: Violation of The Ex Post Facto Clause
217. The retroactive application of TSORP 2017 violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of the U.S. Constitution91 because it makes more burdensome the punishment imposed for offenses committed before the enactment of TSORP as well as applies it retroactively.
Count VIII: Violation of the Eighth Amendment
218. The punishment imposed by TSORP 2017 is quite excessive and arbitrary because of the acts committed by the public against the plaintiffs and other TSORP 2017 registrants.
Count IX: Violation of Double Jeopardy
219. TSORP 2017 also violates Double Jeopardy by imposing additional punishment on a registrant even after they have completed their sentencing requirements.

1 2 3 6