IL: Sex offender facing charges in Troy sues, says burden to prove innocence is too high

A Florida man facing child sex assault charges has filed a lawsuit against the state of Illinois alleging that the burden of proof placed on him to prove his innocence is too high.

____ ____ says Illinois’ laws “allow convictions without proof,” placing a crippling burden on the defendant and lowering the burden of proof for prosecutors so much so that they only need to place someone on the stand and point and say, “He did it.” This, he said, is a violation of his Fifth Amendment rights to protect against self-incrimination and violates his 14th Amendment right to due process.

“The federal court has the jurisdiction to intervene to protect my rights and to ensure Illinois follows the law of the land,” ____ wrote in a 22-page, handwritten lawsuit, filed in federal court in East St. Louis. “Intervene now before I’m convicted based on an unfair and illegal law.” Full Artice

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Is this a satire article? This can’t possibly be true. I mean, why not just point at the prosecutor and state that 17 years ago he raped the defended? Now he has to prove otherwise.

“Actually, in a criminal case, the defendant has no burden of proof. The burden of proof is on the prosecution, which must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Anyone ever charged of a crime, especially a sex crime, knows this is not the reality. The burden of proof is NOT on the prosecution, but on the defendant. There is an assumption of guilt the minute someone is arrested.

I was charged in 2005 with l&l conduct against a 15 year old female and before I knew it they had jacked up the charges from one count to four counts . The only evidence they had was her saying I done it. I hired a female attorney spent several thousand and got jack crap from her. They were not going to make her get on the stand because she was “TRAUMATIZED”. Total bs. I took a plea deal and still went to prison for five years even though everyone agreed to downward departure to a non registry offense. But low and behold the victims advocate raised sand about it and of course the judge went with what the victims advocate said. Had to do 5 years in prison in Florida 5 years probation and am on the registry. There’s no way to get a fair trial against this kind of mess unless youre an elite. Word of a minors mouth is almost insurmountable.