The Indiana Supreme Court has found no constitutional violation against a father who refused to participate in a sex offender treatment program that he argued would violate his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
The Indiana Supreme Court has found no constitutional violation against a father who refused to participate in a sex offender treatment program that he argued would violate his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
It seems fitting that I read this as INJUSTICES reject 5th Amendment appeal…
I don’t know why polygraphs are still in use today.
The courts reject them in case hearings because they are unreliable.
American Psychological Association considers polygraphs junk science.
Polygraph machines cannot “detect” lies only monitor heart, breathing, and perspiration. Reading them is more art than science.
Yet they are still in use under the guise of therapy and to determine a specific offender’s fate.
They should be banned outright.
People really ought to do their legal research. You can’t refuse the polygraph and you can only assert a 5th amendment right where one applies. Go to your public law library, 27 A.L.R.7th Art. 8 read it…