WI: Gov. Tony Evers Vetoes Changes To Sex Offender Residency Requirements

[wpr.org – 11/25/19]

Measure Passed Legislature With Unanimous Vote, Bipartisan Support

Gov. Tony Evers has vetoed a bipartisan bill that would have lifted state restrictions on how close people convicted of sex crimes can live to schools.

The bill, which passed the state Assembly and Senate unanimously, would have repealed a state law that bars sexually violent persons from living less than 1,500 feet from schools, public parks, places of worship or youth centers.

The bill would also have required offenders be placed in their home county after being released from prison or a mandated treatment program.

In his veto message, Evers said the change would have compromised children’s safety.

“Providing as safe of a place as we can for our kids to grow, learn, and play is one of the most vital responsibilities of our society,” his veto message read.

Read and listen

 

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

How does a governor veto overturn a unanimous vote by the state legislature?

Evers was hit with an add during his election run up that claimed he’d overlooked or took the side of education professionals who’d been accused of indecent behaviors in schools. The add had case #s to ad authenticity to the ad. His veto here only impacts SVPs, not run of the mill offenders. Never the less affirmative restraint is clearly intended by the 1500 ft. statute.
Popularity does not necessarily equate to constitutional if fact often it the proof of concept. The thought that one is protected by 500 ft and more by 1000 ft is erroneous wishful magical thinking. That a database of bad actors will save you from violence is b completely distorted reality.

Thank goodness California had Jerry Brown, a governor with more compassion and a higher vision for humanity than this two bit political hack. Clearly he has a personal agenda to go against a unanimous vote like that. Would love to see an FBI investigation of him to see what is up.

Does the WI legislature have a means to override a veto? Most states do. Considering it passed unanimously, I don’t see how they could be stopped if they tried. If they don’t I’d have to wonder what their motivations were when they wrote and passed the bill in the first place.