CA: 2nd sex predator denied placement in East County home

[fox5sandiego.com – 5/20/21]

EL CAJON, Calif. — After weeks of protest from community members and local leaders, a judge has ruled that a second man deemed a “sexually violent predator” by the state will not be placed in an East County home.

Douglas Badger, 78, will not be allowed to live under supervision in the Mount Helix neighborhood near El Cajon, the San Diego Superior Court announced Thursday.

Sexually violent predators — sometimes referred to as “SVPs” — are people convicted of sexually violent offenses and diagnosed with a mental disorder that makes them considered likely to strike again. In Badger’s case, he was convicted in the 80s and 90s of holding up young male hitchhikers at gunpoint and assaulting them.

He was the second sex predator deemed unfit for the East County home in recent weeks. Neighbors praised the May 10 decision to deny 64-year-old SVP Merle Wade Wakefield placement in the community, but had continued their fight against Badger being moved to the same address.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

That is a 78 year old man they are shunning. [ACSOL Moderators comment to KLM: Violent comment removed; Future comments will be blocked without valid email]

If the home is being supervised, what’s the problem. Oh, never mind. The snobs in the neighborhood think they’re better than anyone else.
So the question arises…if someone in that neighborhood commits a crime, do they have to move out of the neighborhood too?
Hmmmm….

Sounds like Megan’s law is crumbling right before our eyes this has to be a real pain in the ass for the San Diego county sheriff’s office they dont know what to do with this guy and it’s not just San Diego county it’s the whole state of California they dont know what to do with sex offenders anymore.
Thanks to the public sex offenders have become a burden on to Society and a major problem for law enforcement agencies.
The new California teir law SB384 has nothing to do with giving people a second chance they only passed that bill because law enforcement was overwhelmed with trying to keep 170.000 people in complaints Megan’s law has literally back fired on law enforcement agencies in California.

Good luck 😈

Georgia’s answer to the housing problem was to send registrants to live under a bridge. Literally.

Does San Diego want to be the next Miami? Homeless people forced to register living under bridges all because of a power tripping Dead beat drunk dad and princess Barbie. Miami isn’t a city to follow unless you like being a National embarrassment!!

Cheers San Diego

Wasn’t Mr. Badger the soon-to-be-released parolee registrant who we were asked a few weeks back to e-mail support of to the San Diego Sheriff’s dept.? Was this the final outcome?

What did people/the state do before this registry thing. Lol. Too funny.

All these neighbors are a bunch of pearl clutching crabs with their pinchers. How many people are committing crimes right now under your pinchers? Maybe all of you need to trade in your fragile shells and egos. Thank God the world isn’t your oyster because you all have ugly pearls!!