ACSOL March 18, 2023 Online Meeting

Please join ACSOL Executive Director and civil rights attorney Janice Bellucci as well as ACSOL board member and criminal defense attorney Chance Oberstein for our next meeting.  The meeting will be held on Saturday, March 18, online on Zoom beginning at 10 a.m. Pacific time, 1:00 PM Eastern, and will last at least two hours. You can use the Zoom app or call in using a Zoom phone number.

There is no registration needed for this meeting. You can use the Zoom app to see Janice and Chance and choose to show or hide yourself, or you can use the Zoom phone number to call in to the meeting.

This meeting will be recorded and then posted here as an audio recording within a couple of days. A link to the recording will be at the top of our pages.

Discussion topics will include:

  • SORNA
  • California Lobby Day 2023
  • meet a board member
  • the California Tiered Registry (now effective)
  • challenges to California Tiered Registry Law
  • domestic and overseas travel
  • other current topics and pending legal action throughout the nation.

Please Show Up, Stand Up and Speak Up!

To join our Zoom meeting with your Zoom app, click on this link:

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83273166148 

Or you can call in to one of the phone numbers below, then specify:
Meeting ID: 832 7316 6148
Here is one Zoom number +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
Or find your local number from around the world: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kcQ8fXsCtM

 

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Not to add more to the plate, I just thought of something that may be good for these type of conference calls/meetings:

  • If people choose to, have them e-mail questions relating to the topics posted if they are unable to attend. Maybe have a trusted member prescreen and choose a few questions per a topic that would help a majority of the people understand something? Obviously not every question would be read but it may be another avenue to answer questions on people’s minds in a general sense not to their particular case.
  • For questions that do not make it, maybe have someone give a general guidance to that question, not from a legal profession but from someone that can guide them to a website for more information. I understand that no one is allowed (besides attorneys) to give legal advice nor should it be considered legal advice. This may also lead to more clients for the attorneys if the question is more of a client-attorney privilege.

Thank you for this post and reminder of our Meeting this coming Saturday, 3/18/2023. I look forward to our monthly meeting. I have some questions regarding SB731 bill. I hope we can talk about this item and perhaps Attorney Janice would expand on this for us – SB731

Effective July 1, 2023, the new law under SB 731 expands this conviction record relief making it available for defendants convicted of most felonies on or after January 1, 2005, provided they have completed their incarceration, probation, mandatory supervision, parole or any other terms of their conviction, and a period of 4 years has elapsed during which the defendant was not convicted of a new felony offense. The new law does not apply to registered sex offenders. . .

. . . And while people with violent, serious felony records would not be offered the automatic “clean slate,” they could, for the first time, petition to have their records sealed.

My questions are: 1) when they referred to “Serious felony records” will this apply to any of the PC288 categories? 2) and how does this apply to those that were successful in getting their records dismissed? 3) For those that have, and for those that will soon be, granted removal from RSO registration, will they/we be consider eligible for automatic sealed/clean slate? 4) How do we find out, do we have to wait for DOJ to eventually notify us, (on not) or instead of waiting, should we apply for “Sealed Records” petition anyway?

My questions may have obvious answers, but since we have seen for ourselves how DOJ plays games and chose to interpret laws to fit their needs and desires, I was hoping we could get additional information during our meeting on what and how to proceed in this new area of the Law. Please update us on anything in this matter. Thank you for your time and help.