AZ Action Alert: GOP bill would add all low-risk sex offenders to Arizona’s online registry

Source: azmirror.com 4/3/23

All low-risk sex offenders would be required to be listed on the sex offender registry under a Republican proposal that critics say is retroactive and would take away the discretion of law enforcement to review risk assessments. 

Currently, the sex offender registry website must include any offender whose risk assessment has been determined to be a Level Two or Level Three, or any person assessed to be a Level One offender and whose victim was under 12 years old. 

The proposed law, Senate Bill 1583 would punish Level One offenders who were 18 years or older at the time of the offense and were sentenced for a dangerous crime against children on or after August 9, 2017. 

Read the full article

Arizona residents, take action! Write, call, and show up to the hearings for SB 1583! Fight this!

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Email sent legislators: I am writing to oppose S. B. 1583 as it will once again add more costs to an already over-bloated state budget. I have followed your career and supported your campaign based on the simple premise of being fiscally responsible with my tax dollars. As a retired person, I have a limited income and fully expect you to spend every penny that you take from me wisely. 
This registry is not cost effective as it is not registrants who commit 97% of these crimes. It is someone known to the victim. These monies would be better spent on prevention programs to help stop these horrific crimes, instead of wasting even more money on a useless registry. I will be speaking to my peers very loudly about this and I hope many more of my fellow constituents will voice their opinions.
I do hope you still have the fortitude to buck the political headwinds, get back to your conservative roots, and stop supporting wasteful and unnecessary spending that serves no purpose and does not protect anyone or anything. Feel good legislation is for amateurs. Step up and do what is right.

What good is this beyond further punishment? It’s clearly meant as such.

I’m glad I live in Massachusetts where there’s only 3 republicans in the state senate.