U.S. Sentencing Commission Seeks Comment On Proposals Addressing The Impact Of Acquitted Conduct, Youthful Convictions, And Other Issues

WASHINGTON, D.C. ― Today the U.S. Sentencing Commission voted to seek comment on several proposals that would, among other things, limit the federal courts’ consideration of acquitted conduct and youthful convictions under the federal sentencing guidelines.

The bipartisan Commission voted today to publish for public comment several options to address the use of acquitted conduct for sentencing purposes. The proposed amendment comes after the Commission took up the issue during last year’s abbreviated amendment cycle but determined that more time and public comment was needed before promulgating amendments. The U.S. Supreme Court recently denied several petitions for writs of certiorari related to the use of acquitted conduct. In issuing the denials, four Justices indicated their support for the denial, in part, to give the Commission time to address the issue.

U.S. District Judge Carlton W. Reeves, Chair of the Commission, said, “When the Supreme Court tells us to address an issue, the Commission listens. From continuing the use of acquitted conduct to restricting (or even eliminating) its use in sentencing, all options are on the table. We need the input of stakeholders—from seasoned federal judges to the individuals who have been directly impacted by sentencing and incarceration—to settle on the best course of action.” (Access the Comment Portal.)

Prompted by evolving brain development research, the Commission also proposed changes that would limit the impact of prior juvenile convictions on criminal history scoring and expand consideration of an individual’s youthful age at sentencing. Judge Reeves said, “Congress directed the Commission to draft fair and equitable guidelines that reflect advancements in knowledge of human behavior as it relates to the criminal justice process. We look forward to the public’s input on how to ensure that federal sentencing reflects all of the relevant data and research around age, crime, and justice.”

The Commission also proposed an amendment that would simplify the current “three-step process” followed by judges at sentencing by effectively removing step two—consideration of departures under the Guidelines Manual. The proposal would also more closely align Commission guidance regarding consideration of individual characteristics with the factors set forth by Congress in section 3553(a).

“The Commission has reported on the impact of the Booker decision on multiple occasions. Today’s proposed amendment acts on these observations and, after nearly 20 years, would update the Guidelines Manual to more fully reflect the advisory sentencing guidelines system established by the Supreme Court in Booker,” said Judge Reeves.

As part of this year’s policy work, the Commission has also worked to compile and disseminate information on court-sponsored programs relating to diversion, alternatives-to-incarceration, and reentry. While the Commission did not propose amendments on this priority, the Commission published program documentation and background information on its website. The Commission has also released its first podcast episode in a miniseries highlighting the various problem-solving courts around the country. It is the Commission’s intent to continue to develop and update these resources throughout the amendment year.

Several other technical or clarifying amendments were proposed today, including amendments addressing the guidelines commentary, new laws, and several circuit conflicts.

Today’s proposals are all drawn from the final policy priorities the Commission unanimously approved in August 2023. The proposed amendments and issues for comment will be subject to a public comment period running through February 22, 2024. A public hearing on the proposed amendments will be scheduled in Washington, D.C., at a later date.

The Commission will soon post information about public hearings as well as a data presentation on today’s Proposed Youthful Individuals Amendment. Official text of proposed amendments and issues for comment will also be published in a forthcoming edition of the Federal Register.

“We look forward to receiving your comments,” Judge Reeves said.

Read the document below and then click here to Access the Comment Portal.

The above link will only work for this during the open comment period that has already begun and ends February 22, 2024.

 

Download the PDF file .

 

Page source

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I was 17 when I commented my registrable offense and 18 when I was convicted, I was so young when I took my plea deal, everybody in the court room gasp when I pleaded guilty.
At 17 do I believe my cerebral cortex was fully developed no, so my ability to make rational decisions wasn’t fully developed either, in no way am I trying to justifying anything I’m just stating scientific fact.
Putting teenagers on the registry for life is cruel and unusual punishment, especially if the crime didn’t involve anyone under the age of 14.