CA: Montgomery County man gets $431,000 for time wrongly listed on sex offender registry

Source: wsls.com 7/13/24

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Va. – A Montgomery County man is finally getting closure after he was convicted of a crime he didn’t commit.

Closure in the amount of nearly half a million dollars.

David Kingrea received over $55,000 last year from the Commonwealth for the time he spent in jail in 2014 for a crime he didn’t commit.

But that’s not where David’s story ends. There was more money to come for the eight years Kingrea wrongfully spent on the Virginia Sex Offender Registry.

“Being on the registry itself has been a death sentence,” said Kingrea.

While on the registry, Kingrea was barred from parts of his son, Dylan’s life.

He couldn’t visit Dylan at school, take him to the playground or even be apart of parent-teacher conferences.

Kingrea will receive about $431,000 from the Commonwealth for his time on the sex offender registry.

“It’s half a million dollars. You know no amount of money can ever pay for time. Time is so precious. And that’s a fact. It can buy a lot of things, it can’t buy that but it can make things right for tomorrow,” said Kingrea.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

It should’ve been MILLIONS.

Nowadays when it comes to sex crimes, a mere accusation is considered sufficient proof to convict. Even when there is no other evidence, and sometimes even with evidence to the contrary. This case highlights the problem with this type of prosecution, which appears to be limited solely to sex crime.

Agree that whoever reported this false incident – be it the victim, child services, teacher, neighborhood busybody – is responsible. I would argue that the state should prosecute that person, as the accusation cost the state upwards of $1M (factoring investigation, prosecution, conviction and appeal as well as his settlement). But that won’t happen, under the absolutely absurd notion that prosecuting false accusations somehow discourages reporting genuine ones.

Also, this is from Virginia, not California.

Wait… Its not a punishment so why was he owed anything?! Oh that’s right, the statement that its not punishment is bull and the government knows it.

Should be the same for those who are granted reductions to tier 1. They take months to make the changes. If it is earned, it should be done. Not a sit on it and wait.

This is very interesting for me, On a probation transfer the California superior court accidentally convicted me twice for the same crime, I spent 5 days in jail and lived with the conviction for 14 years. I should’ve been off the registry 2 years ago BUT because of this mistake Im still here battling the registry.
I want my money for the 5 days I spent in jail and the two extra years I spent on the registry.
My attorney keeps calming me down she wants me to just focus on getting off the registry for now.

Last edited 20 hours ago by AERO 1

If the so-called sex registry is just “regulatory” and “civil” (as they love to claim) then WHY is it defamatory and life-destroying for someone ELSE that is placed on it by “mistake?”