MD: Maryland’s highest court upholds ending statute of limitations on child sex abuse lawsuits

Source: apnews.com 2/3/25

ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — Maryland’s Supreme Court on Monday upheld the constitutionality of a state law that ended the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse lawsuits following a report that exposed widespread wrongdoing within the Archdiocese of Baltimore.

The court upheld the 2023 law in a 4-3 ruling, saying the Maryland General Assembly had the authority to change the law as it did, after hearing arguments in September.

Opposition over the law’s constitutionality focused on an earlier 2017 law that established a cutoff age of 38 for victims to sue. The justices considered whether it was written in a way that permanently protected certain defendants from liability. The court concluded that the Maryland Legislature has the power to change such a statute, which it did in passing the 2023 law.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Statutes of limitation serve an important purpose. When a lawsuit is filed decades after an event, memories have faded and physical evidence may no longer be available. As a result, litigation is often based upon he said, she said and we know how that turns out. In most cases, the alleged perpetrator is found guilty. In addition, many people will be charged with a crime they have not committed and their lives as well as the lives of the members of their families will be significantly harmed. The law in this case is yet one more example of a law that is too broad and will catch many innocent people in its net. I can only hope no states follow this example. I also hope the U.S. Supreme Court will grant review of this decision and overturn it.

How will they explain why retired Officer Handsy has no recent victims? There were dozens back when he was an Explorer Scout Mentor, but not one since he retired 20 years ago? How is that possible?

Ms. PhysEd routinely hooked up with boys in her gym class for years… some as young as 14… but since she retired… nothing? Also, why no “victims” that were not in her HS Gym Class, ever?

Over and over we will find this? For every one person that has so much as a single recent victim, there will be 20 that have none? There will be thousands of people that loose lawsuits for events that took place 20+ years ago, but virtually nobody will face charges for anything recent?

The more ancient crimes get unearthed, the more “Lifetime Frightening and High” is exposed as a lie? Doesn’t matter what they did, who they did it to, or how often they did it, the supermajority eventually stop? Only a tiny percentage of people continue with that kinds of behaviors for life… and the majority of the ones that do, target adult women?

Even people that are exclusively attracted to preadolescent children get older, and with age comes wisdom, restraint, reduced libido, and very often, regret for past misdeeds.