“It’s shameful that government officials would use the criminal legal process to censor art and expression.”
Police in Fort Worth, Texas, seized photographs from an art exhibit in November after local politicians decried the images as pornographic. The photos, from artist Sally Mann’s 1992 collection Immediate Family depict intimate details of Mann’s family life, including several images of her young children nude. This week, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Texas spoke out against the seizure, arguing the images are non-sexualized works of art protected by the First Amendment.
“It’s shameful that government officials would use the criminal legal process to censor art and expression,” Adriana Piñon the legal director of the ACLU of Texas said in a Wednesday statement. “This is a clear violation of the First Amendment and of the guardrails against abuse of the criminal justice system. Artistic expression should not be subject to the whim and punishment of government officials’ personal taste.”
Mann’s photos were being exhibited at The Modern Art Museum of Forth Worth, as part of an exhibit called “Diaries of Home,” which featured photographs from female and nonbinary artists that “probe preconceptions about domestic, familial, and communal spaces in the United States, which are often considered feminine spheres.”
Intimate Family contains 13 photos depicting children in the nude. Some of the images displayed at the museum included “depictions of Mann’s daughter jumping onto a picnic table in a ballet pose, Mann’s daughter lying in bed with a stain from a nighttime accident, and Mann’s son with a melted popsicle running down his body,” according to the ACLU’s press release.
Should we presume all employees and visitors of the museum will soon be arrested and charged for viewing this display?
“It’s shameful that government officials would use the criminal legal process to censor art and expression.”
But they know porno when they see it…