Guyana: No Hiding Place: Sex Offender List to Go National in Guyana.

Source:  thestkittsnevisobserver.com 4/10/25

Public meetings are now happening in Guyana as the government plans to update the Sexual Offences Act. The goal is to give better protection to victims and handle sexual violence cases more effectively.

The Ministry of Human Services and Social Security is asking people and organizations to share their ideas on a new draft law called the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Bill 2024. Civil society groups are especially encouraged to send in their suggestions.

New sex offender database proposed

One of the main ideas in the draft law is to create a national database. This list would include people found guilty of sexual crimes in Guyana or other countries. The Police Commissioner would be in charge of it.

To find out if someone is on the list, a person would need to send a request form to the police. Children and people with mental disabilities would not be listed.

Lawyer Kim Kyte-Thomas, who helped write the law, said there would be strict rules about who can see the data. Breaking these rules would lead to punishment. Offenders would have to register and report regularly while serving their sentence.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The only reason they’re doing this is because America is most likely pressuring them to do so. Their so-called “Angel Watch” and “outreach” liaison at the NCMEC is actively pandering to nations and regions that don’t have Online SORs in place. It’s predictable and outrageous.

It’s all done exclusively for retaliatory demoralization, entertainment for sadists and profit.

And before someone says “at least their registry is being presented and introduced as need-to-know-basis, rest assured, their WILL be pressure to follow the U.S. model where everyone is put on full blast.

Last edited 1 day ago by FactsShouldMatter

“Children and people with mental disabilities would not be listed.”

Wish it was like that in the US. Then I’d refuse to register and argue that I am a person with mental disabilities in the eyes of the court, shown by their mandated “treatment” obligation. I know I’d lose – the court would somehow find that that kind of mental disability doesn’t count, despite the legislature’s omission. But it would still be worth opening the can of worms.

How about Guyana create a list of people who dranked the KoolAid? 🤔 That tragedy had forever tarnish that nation, and no one takes them serious anymore