Southern Baptists Refused to Act on Abuse, Despite Secret List of Pastors

UPDATED 5/24/22: Southern Baptist leaders say they will release list of alleged sex abusers [washingtonpost.com]

Source: christianitytoday.com 5/22/22

Armed with a secret list of more than 700 abusive pastors, Southern Baptist leaders chose to protect the denomination from lawsuits rather than protect the people in their churches from further abuse.

Survivors, advocates, and some Southern Baptists themselves spent more than 15 years calling for ways to keep sexual predators from moving quietly from one flock to another. The men who controlled the Executive Committee (EC)—which runs day-to-day operations of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC)—knew the scope of the problem. But, working closely with their lawyers, they maligned the people who wanted to do something about abuse and repeatedly rejected pleas for help and reform.

“Behind the curtain, the lawyers were advising to say nothing and do nothing, even when the callers were identifying predators still in SBC pulpits,” according to a massive third-party investigative report released Sunday.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

As part of BSC smoke screen they are major proponent of harsh sex offender laws.

Hypocrisy.

Harry I was reading that last night as I scanned thru the internet on topics and things of interest. One has to understand we can’t blame this on any group as much of this is registry is error and a stumbling block. Now since many are in a southern baptist area as VA.some are catholic’s, some are Jim Baker or Jim Jones followers but the point is things at times get covered up as in government Theirs good bad and ugly in everything you know but this registry in many forms is injustice in many ways without due process of true justice.

So the registry was created to protect “persons” from sexual abuse (mainly protect children). But let’s look at all of the “news” out there now recently and not too long ago of all of the child sexual abuse issues that are coming up or have come up and discovered.

It is a good thing we have the registry because the list here shows how well the registry protected all of the children involved in the below cases. How many people that were involved in the below cases were on the registry at the time of their crime?

Let’s go thru the list one more time now.
SOUTHERN BAPTISTS
Catholic Church
135 Teachers and Aides
Boy Scouts of America
… and I am sure I may be missing a few other large cases

Last edited 2 years ago by NorthEastPA

It is a good thing we have the registry? Guess its also a good thing to cover up or to put others thru double jeopardy or even the shame of it all in many ways. So in many ways the registry is good until one gets caught up in it or is that the mistakes of many on here. Sounds a bit confusing to me.

The article is about Southern Baptist and I’m sure it has more of a meaning today in many areas. Here is an article that many may find interesting…https://www.biola.edu/blogs/good-book-blog/2019/the-end-never-justifies-the-means