FL: Florida prosecutor announces first death penalty case under new child rape law

Source: tallahassee.com 12/15/23

During a May 1 bill signing event, DeSantis said the measure is “for the protection of children.”

In a first for Florida, a Central Florida prosecutor is seeking the death penalty for a man charged with raping a child. 

The pursuit of capital punishment comes after lawmakers passed and Gov. Ron DeSantis signed into law a measure allowing the death penalty for those convicted of sexually battering children under the age of 12.  

Fifth Judicial Circuit State Attorney Bill Gladson this week announced that a Lake County grand jury had indicted Joseph Andrew Giampa, 36, on charges of child sexual battery and promoting a sexual performance of a child. 

In a statement, Gladson said his decision to pursue the death penalty “reflects the gravity of the charges and the State Attorney’s Office’s dedication to holding criminals accountable for their actions. … Our commitment to ensuring justice and protecting the vulnerable remains unwavering.”

The local angle:Prosecutor, citing law that took effect Oct. 1, will seek death penalty in child sex case

Gladstone’s decision to seek the death penalty will almost surely draw legal challenges, as both U.S. Supreme Court and Florida Supreme Court precedents have barred death sentences for rapists.

The governor acknowledged as much on social media, posting that it “will be the first case to challenge SCOTUS (the U.S. Supreme Court) since I signed legislation to make pedophiles eligible for the death penalty. (Gladson) has my full support.”

In a 2008 case out of Louisiana, the U.S. Supreme Court …

Read the full article

Related:

Lake County prosecutors are the first to seek death on child sex charge [fladeathpenalty.substack.com 12/14/23]

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

26 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I see this article at least had the guts to mention the SCOTUS ruling from 2008, kudos to the author. However, the author did not do all the research they could have. In 1977 SCOTUS addressed this same issue before and reached the same conclusion. That 1977 decision had some very distinct language in it which I’ll paraphrase; We can not rationalize how an individual can be put to death when a death itself did not occur. While the case in question is especially heinous the victim survived and can heal unlike the victim of a murder.
That same paraphrased language was the basis of the 2008 SCOTUS case and hence even with new justices the chances of Florida prevailing is slim due to the idea of stare decisis still being so prevalent as we see from Doe v Alaska in 2003. I hope the FLA Action Committee has a field day with this case.

DeSantis is just posturing. He knows damn well that even if the death penalty is imposed here it’ll be overturned. Even if he has enough clout to sway the Florida Supreme Court, the USSC will strike it down, probably in record time.

And the sad part is that the victim, after being sexually abused, is statistically more likely to become an abuser him or herself. So in the end, in the long run, this death penalty will end up hurting victims of crimes, especially when there is no evidence that the death penalty serves as a deterrent.

Last edited 1 year ago by The Static-99R Is A Scam

That is, so sick. What a son of a bitch. De Santis I mean.

“In fact, Senate Democratic Leader Lauren Book of Plantation, a child sex abuse survivor who voted for the bill, told the Senate Rules Committee when lawmakers debated the proposal that “it never goes away. Sometimes you close your eyes and you see it. I don’t get a chance to make it stop.”

Woman, if you can’t make it stop, then why the hell aren’t you in treatment instead of the Floriduh legislature?

Many of us here know that life in prison as a sex offender can be a living hell. Perhaps DeSantis might be doing this guy a favor through advocating his state-sanctioned murder. However, if DeSentis actually knew anything about life.in prison (all he knows is Gitmo due to his complicity in that part of the federal gulag when he was a Navy lawyer) he’d understand that life in prison is a far more appropriate punishment for this fellow. I don’t know about Florida prisons but I do know something indirectly about Level IV yards in California prisons. They are hellish places. For me, death would be preferable than to have to spend any time in one of those horrid places.

This is just a sample of what America is gonna look like in 2030. We all know De Santis and Gavin Newsom are running for president and one of their main topics are who’s the toughest on public safety, starting with sex offender monitoring and supervision laws.

I never really agreed with the death penalty in any case at all. I would think it is more punishment for someone to spend decades or life in prison than to be put to death. I can’t see how killing someone can be justified no matter what.

Where will it stop? At what point will people draw the line and say that the crime does not warrant the death penalty. Even Trump is saying if he is reelected he will make it so drug dealers get the death penalty – well does that mean even someone selling weed in a state that it is not legal in can get the death penalty even?

It’s remarkable how much of American politics is just rhetoric. Florida has had fewer than 200 executions total since the mid-70s when the death penalty was reinstated in many states. It has more than 1,000 murders every year. If there were a genuine interest in leveraging the death penalty to improve justice, they’d make a more concerted effort to reconcile that enormous deficit.