They weren’t happy about it, but all five members of the Murrieta City Council voted this week in favor of repealing an ordinance that made it illegal for sex offenders to loiter near areas frequented by children. Full Article
Related posts
-
RI: Cranston YMCA employee fired for letting sex offender on grounds
Source: wpri.com 5/16/24 The YMCA of Greater Providence (GPYMCA) fired an employee earlier this month after... -
CT: New Fairfield proposes ordinance to ban sex offenders from public places frequented by children
Source: newstimes.com 10/16/23 NEW FAIRFIELD — The town is proposing a new ordinance that, if adopted, would... -
FL: Revisions made to Hernando County Sex Offender and Sexual Predator Ordinance
Source: hernandosun.com 8/4/23 Last week, the Hernando Sun ran a story on recent changes to the...
It’s so frightening to read the comments of people saying they hope one day all sex offenders are put to death… Things are not how they’re supposed to be in this country.
We wanna say a thank you for somehow ..finally recognizing the law of the land ..our Constitution ..its for everyone ..not just for some but for All……………and those taxpayers expressing harm should be paying the most towards a 55million dollars payment to a wrongly convicted and incorrect record when personnel stood down to altering evidence and not having open court to correct record……taxpayers should be be paying higher taxes for justice that cheats covers-up and instructs jury with known..Known false evidence ……..taxpayers YOU be aware that anyone can be convicted when the scales of justice are tampered with ….if you allow it for some ..you allow it for yourself.
Maybe Mr. Ramos should lose sleep over the fact that he swore an oath to abide by and uphold The Constitution and yet he has no problem violating that oath. Just sayin’.
I especially enjoyed paragraph 5 of the news article in which the Murrieta City Attorney indicates the cost to fight the case and is quoted saying the City’s chances of winning are “remote”.
Criminal threat is the crime of putting someone in fear.
California Penal Code 422 PC defines the crime of “criminal threats” (formerly known as terrorist threats).
A “criminal threat” is when you threaten to kill or physically harm someone and
1. that person is thereby placed in a state of reasonably sustained fear for his/her safety or for the safety of his/her immediate family,
2. the threat is specific and unequivocal and
3. you communicate the threat verbally, in writing, or via an electronically transmitted device.
Criminal threats can be charged whether or not you have the ability to carry out the threat…and even if you don’t actually intend to execute the threat.
This guy, Roy Holmgren Said, “If they are dead there is no issue with how they live their lives. I dont believe in the fake concept of “former molesters.” We as a group file charges against Mr. Holmgren for Criminal threats?
In case anyone would like to use this link to educate people with. I already posted it for this article.
Though FACTS don’t seem to matter to fools:
http://www.cce.csus.edu/portal/admin/handouts/Tiering%20Background%20Paper%20FINAL%20FINAL%204-2-14.pdf
Another blow to those who willingly destroy our constitution and bill of rights and our country. The rest of our government and society need to fall in step and stop acting like the laws of the land do not apply to them. Besides; this entire “sex offender” thing is based on myth and dis-information, and thousands are being punished for what a few have done. These laws harm more children and don’t protect anyone.