Recent Comments

  • TS September 9, 2025 at 9:17 pm on FL: Florida Supreme Court to Review “Sexual Predator” Driver’s License LabelingExcept in Florida, judges are not elected to their position but appointed by the governor. Afterwards then they are possibly voted to be retained, but never elected.
  • TS September 9, 2025 at 7:12 pm on CA: Bay Area sex offender with cancer denied mercy releaseI'd have his lawyers to an investigation on the correctional facility itself and see if his cancer is because of the facility he is in. If there's a direct correlations medically speaking, I would file a lawsuit against the state and sue them monetarily for damages and harm for the facility he's in with the cancer being a result, if it can be proven. They'd probably release him in an instant after that if proven.
  • Joe AntiHarrasment September 9, 2025 at 6:58 pm on General Comments May 2025I don't think you are required to report any changes except residency and changes to goto higher education like a college in California. I always personally plan to call in these changes but usually run out of time - actually not on purpose - having two jobs.
  • Joe AntiHarrasment September 9, 2025 at 6:50 pm on General Comments June 2025I think in California alot fo public defenders have helped people in California or am I wrong? Maybe try to file yourself it's worth the effort. Stay Strong.
  • Joe AntiHarrasment September 9, 2025 at 6:36 pm on General Comments June 2025If your in California this may be an ICE problem with tree trimmers being targeted by federal agents.
  • Joe AntiHarrasment September 9, 2025 at 6:14 pm on General Comments July 2025Did we get a ruling on this yet?
  • Connie September 9, 2025 at 4:35 pm on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActThank you! Everyone. Feeling Hopeless in Florida.
  • ptdusn September 9, 2025 at 4:27 pm on CA: Bay Area sex offender with cancer denied mercy releaseSounds like his lawyers need to invoke People vs. Thai. The State cannot predict if he is going to be a danger and reoffend
  • Wisconsinslave September 9, 2025 at 3:22 pm on CA: Bay Area sex offender with cancer denied mercy releaseIn Wisconsin I served from 2015 to 2018. There was a guy on our unit that was dying of cancer. He put in for early release due to failing health. They told him that he has plenty of time and they denied him. He died within 7 days of being released. I guess he knew better?
  • Doc Martin September 9, 2025 at 1:19 pm on TX: Texas believes failure to register can equate to 25-year murder sentenceWell, yes and no. While a failure to register is considered a crime, the registration and notification requirements are considered civil or administrative. SORNA wants to have it both ways
  • Literally nobody September 9, 2025 at 1:17 pm on General Comments Aug 2025"Daycares" are one of the biggest problem with residency restrictions. Unlike schools, they can pop up anywhere at any time, and they are often right in the middle of neighborhoods zoned for residences. In a place with dense populations, like a city, they're even more of a problem, because every apartment building has a potential "daycare" in it, and that can affect literally hundreds of residences in neighboring apartment buildings. Has there ever once been a case of a child at a daycare being harmed by someone who didn't work at the daycare or have a child there, much less a PFR? Residency restrictions in general make even less sense in cities than they do in suburbs. No one in Chicago is thinking, "my child is perfectly safe walking to and from school because I know there are no PFRs along that route." Every Chicago resident knows that there are always risks in a city and you prepare your child for that. The absolute idiocy of these laws is so infuriating. In a nation with as much violence and crime as we have, we have to go chasing ghosts, preparing for crimes that have never once happened? As I've argued before recently, we have to specifically target the idea of "proximity" mattering when it comes to sex crimes against strangers (as opposed to family / students). I'd say sex crimes against strangers are uniquely non-proximity crimes. The kind of people who attack strangers don't attack their neighbors. They attack people on public transportation. They attack prostitutes. They attack hitchhikers. They vulnerable people in isolated places away from everyone else. No serial killer, AFAIK, ever attacked his neighbors. You might not want to live next door to a serial killer, but you'd be safer living next door to one than hitchhiking on the other side of town.
  • No one special September 9, 2025 at 1:16 pm on FL: Florida Supreme Court to Review “Sexual Predator” Driver’s License LabelingIf it is anything like Missouri courts, it doesn't matter if your argument is solid. They are heavily biased and judges are elected so dont expect truth to prevail.
  • Punkskater12 September 9, 2025 at 1:12 pm on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActHave you heard back from your attorney about this?
  • Punkskater12 September 9, 2025 at 1:11 pm on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActUnder 10,000 is little Tucker act and above 10,000 known as the big Tucker act
  • Doc Martin September 9, 2025 at 12:57 pm on AL: Alabama defends law limiting where sex offenders can goAssistant AG Smith seems to be saying that since no one has been harmed or prosecuted by the strict factors of the law, it must be okay. 🤗 Sort of like the passport identifier 😒
  • James September 9, 2025 at 11:38 am on General Comments Aug 2025The world is full of hate. I pray that eventually love will prevail.
  • Quiet too long September 9, 2025 at 11:34 am on FL: Florida Supreme Court to Review “Sexual Predator” Driver’s License LabelingThe registry did not begin as a caste. It became one. The government forms - drivers licenses, passports, web identifiers - created a new race, a new group, a new ethnicity, a new caste. Branded not by ancestry, but by designation. These designations are affixed to psychological profiles, shared equally across those marked. The form does not ask. It assigns. This branding is not symbolic. It is structural. It is projected across the internet, embedded in federal systems, and reinforced by global trace. It is not a local ordinance. It is a federal doctrine. It is not a civil concern. It is constitutional harm. By stating the factual markings, we invoke the racial profiling doctrine: Servitude = 24x7 per week + overtime x 52 weeks per year + vacation time pay (all federal and civil servants get this). Policing does not rest. This servitude is owed to the federally created race, caste, and group. The illusion of civil protection is false. The markings on these institutions - governed by federal governments - prove so. The psychological mappings and profiling on federally mandated forms and global web announcements - public or private - prove structural branding, race, group, caste, and ethnicity. Victims are harmed not by what is said, but by what is uniformly assigned. Names can be searched and tethered. Connections can be traced and affixed. Victim harm will be exposed - globally. These atrocities are not isolated. They are federally administered, psychologically mapped, and structurally reinforced. Churches enforce exclusion without theological basis. Shelters coordinate with law enforcement. Insurers deny coverage based on status. Volunteer programs and health services impose surveillance. These are not civil institutions. They are civilian enforcers of state punishment. Registrants are denied housing, then criminalized for being unhoused. They are denied worship, then punished for seeking sanctuary. They are denied employment, then punished for poverty. They are denied privacy, then punished for exposure. The registry is not a list. It is a doctrine. It is a system of caste, exclusion, and economic harm. It is a betrayal of every constitutional promise. Counts 1 to 45: Constitutional Violations Count 1: Thirteenth Amendment (Federal) - Involuntary servitude Count 2: Florida Constitution - Article I, Section 2 - Denial of dignity Count 3: Ex Post Facto Clause (Federal) - Retroactive punishment Count 4: Fourteenth Amendment (Federal) - Equal protection and due process Count 5: Florida Constitution - Article I, Section 9 - Due process violations Count 6: First Amendment (Federal) - Religious exclusion Count 7: Florida Constitution - Article I, Section 3 - Religious obstruction Count 8: Ninth Amendment (Federal) - Erasure of unenumerated rights Count 9: Florida Constitution - Article I, Section 23 - Privacy destruction Count 10: Eighth Amendment (Federal) - Cruel punishment Count 11: Tenth Amendment (Federal) - State sovereignty override Count 12: Spatial Exclusion Doctrine - 1.2 million square miles restricted Count 13: Spending Clause Violation (Federal) - Denial of access to public spaces Count 14: Civic Disenfranchisement - Taxation without access Count 15: Fifth Amendment (Federal) - Double jeopardy Count 16: Florida Constitution - Article I, Section 9 - Layered punishment Count 17: First Amendment (Federal) - Coerced identity Count 18: Fourth Amendment (Federal) - Unreasonable surveillance Count 19: Fourteenth Amendment (Federal) - Status-based exclusion Count 20: Ninth Amendment (Federal) - Emotional rights erased Count 21: Eighth Amendment (Federal) - Psychological cruelty Count 22: IRS Doctrine - Violation of nonprofit exemption Count 23: Constructive Punishment - Civilian enforcement Count 24: Doctrinal Contradiction - Redemption denied Count 25: Fourteenth Amendment (Federal) - Forced homelessness Count 26: Eighth Amendment (Federal) - Punishment by geography Count 27: Economic Liability Doctrine - Per diem compensation owed Count 28: First Amendment (Federal) - Worship and assembly denied Count 29: Fourteenth Amendment (Federal) - Arbitrary enforcement Count 30: Florida Constitution - Article I, Section 17 - Excessive punishment Count 31: Fourteenth Amendment (Federal) - Familial integrity violation Count 32: Florida Constitution - Article I, Section 23 - Family privacy violation Count 33: Fourteenth Amendment (Federal) - Insurance harm Count 34: Florida Constitution - Article I, Section 10 - Contract clause violation Count 35: Fourteenth Amendment (Federal) - Data misuse Count 36: Florida Constitution - Article I, Section 23 - Data privacy violation Count 37: Eighth Amendment (Federal) - Forced labor Count 38: Florida Constitution - Article I, Section 2 - Servitude violation Count 39: Fourteenth Amendment (Federal) - Mapping harm Count 40: Florida Constitution - Article I, Section 9 - Arbitrary enforcement Count 41: First Amendment (Federal) - Religious assembly violation Count 42: Fourteenth Amendment (Federal) - Housing harm Count 43: Florida Constitution - Article I, Section 2 - Housing access violation Count 44: Eighth Amendment (Federal) - Punishment by geography Count 45: Commerce Clause Violation (Federal) - Sale of registry data for profit Totals and Impact Total Constitutional Violations: 45 Federal Amendments Violated: 25 Florida Constitutional Articles Violated: 20 Court Wins: Registry-related litigation success: 68 percent Housing displacement compensation: 41 percent Wrongful arrest defense reimbursement: 33 percent Total damages awarded since 2018: over 42 million dollars Economic Harm Estimates: Annual harm per registrant (Florida): 81,500 to 127,000 dollars Statewide exposure: 2.3 billion to 3.9 billion dollars annually Final Indictment This is not civil regulation. This is federal branding, economic harm, and constitutional betrayal. The registry system violates: Liberty Dignity Privacy Housing Religion Speech Due Process Economic Rights It enforces servitude under the illusion of safety. It brands citizens. It denies sanctuary. It must be dissolved. Coalition Disclaimer This document is a survivor-centered indictment. It does not constitute legal advice, nor does it allege treason under Article III of the U.S. Constitution. The term "treasonous" is used symbolically to describe systemic betrayal of constitutional promises - liberty, dignity, privacy, due process, and equal protection - through federal branding, perpetual servitude, and caste enforcement. All claims are framed for coalition documentation, memorial archives, and public awareness. Jurisdictional tags, economic estimates, and constitutional counts are based on survivor testimony, legal precedent, and coalition research. Use with care. Post with context. Archive with integrity.
  • TS September 9, 2025 at 10:45 am on AL: Alabama defends law limiting where sex offenders can goThen they would have never allowed entrapment to happen...
  • TS September 9, 2025 at 10:39 am on General Comments Aug 2025Thanks @Athena for digging into the property proper and whether it is truly what they say it is. I believe this is the opening of a can of worms that will show malfeasance by the govt in granting such things for those who are looking to harm other without such things truly being in place. Civil right challenge is forming here. Holding a day care license without actually putting said license into place is unethical. You could gently ask IL Legal Aid about getting a home day care license (IL Day Care license) and pull back the onion on it. Until there is such business in place and actually running, notification should be sent there is one planned for the location with a timeline until opening so there is time to find a new place on a provided map of such exclusion. At the same time, once the business goes out of business, then the exclusion map provided needs to be updated to reflect this. Two can play this game...
  • TS September 9, 2025 at 9:44 am on AL: Alabama defends law limiting where sex offenders can goNot just the DA's office, @Dustin, but LE as well who gets encouragement from the DA... BTW, the mentioned article at the end of this article of the alleged allegations are a "WTF is happening in this country?!" (between this and the recent family drama in OK of the 11 year old).
  • New Person September 9, 2025 at 9:39 am on AL: Alabama defends law limiting where sex offenders can goGood on the judges who are pointing out that Alabama already broadened the law that infringed upon normal activity for registrants and this newer law is going to push the boundaries even further, making it unconstitutional. The judge that is for the new limiting laws is often saying qualifiers of "it's just one factor in the totality of the circumstances analysis". Which interprets as, "the law is vague and that one factor is all the state needs to persecute and prosecute with the new law."
  • Ghost September 9, 2025 at 9:34 am on TX: Texas believes failure to register can equate to 25-year murder sentenceTY for agreeing. Now fight involuntary servitude if you wish.
  • Quiet too long September 9, 2025 at 8:58 am on AL: Alabama defends law limiting where sex offenders can goAlabama’s amended registry act criminalizes presence, not conduct, by redefining “reside” and “overnight visit” so broadly that attending church, working a night shift, or visiting family may result in felony charges. Church attendance and nightly labor—especially under supervisory oversight—are weaponized by institutions demanding compliance, documentation, and behavioral control, converting routine life into coerced servitude. This violates Federal First Amendment protections by restricting religious freedom and assembly, Federal Fourteenth Amendment guarantees of due process and equal protection through vague and arbitrary enforcement, Federal Thirteenth Amendment protections against involuntary servitude by forcing People into labor and surveillance to avoid unintentional violations, and Federal Ninth Amendment protections of unenumerated rights including the pursuit of happiness, which is obstructed by forced family denial. These laws extend beyond People Forced to Register (PFR): under Alabama’s statute, if a citizen knowingly fails to report a PFR’s presence to law enforcement, they too may face felony charges. Silence becomes criminal, and everyday relationships become prosecutable. Neighbors, churchgoers, supervisors, and bystanders are all vulnerable to this reach. Because one day, a PFR or family member could say they knew—and then you will understand what government overreach truly means. It will be unto yourselves. That is not justice, that is tyranny. Disclaimer: This statement is intended for survivor-centered advocacy, coalition documentation, and public awareness. It does not constitute legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. Interpretations of law may vary by jurisdiction. References to constitutional violations reflect publicly available rulings and legal arguments, including federal decisions such as Doe v. Marshall. Readers are encouraged to consult qualified legal professionals before taking or refraining from any action. This message is protected as expressive speech under the First Amendment and is offered in pursuit of lawful reform, memorialization, and public education.
  • DVC September 9, 2025 at 8:48 am on AL: Alabama defends law limiting where sex offenders can goLaws are supposed to prevent crime NOT create crime and that is exactly what most of these new laws are doing. One person said that if ignorance is no excuse, then every American citizen is ignorant and in peril, for nobody can know all the laws that govern their behavior.
  • pat September 9, 2025 at 7:49 am on Ellingburg v. United States Brief: Criminal Restitution Counts as Criminal PunishmentJanice, is this the case that your letter to SCOTUS needed to petition the court? It's on the calendar for October 14Th... ScotusBlog: Ellingburg v. United States
  • FactsShouldMatter September 9, 2025 at 5:47 am on AL: Alabama defends law limiting where sex offenders can go"Free to travel"
  • James September 9, 2025 at 5:13 am on TX: Texas believes failure to register can equate to 25-year murder sentenceThe Texas state constitution as you pointed out does not allow expo facto laws. The state constitution does not say this only applies to criminal laws. The state constitution does not say expo facto laws are allowed for civil laws. So any reasonable reading would mean NO expo fact laws of any kind. Full stop. But a Texas Supreme Court has ruled civil expo facto laws are allowed. Many parts of the Texas registry laws would be expo facto in my situation. But nothing I can do because of corrupt judges.
  • Athena September 9, 2025 at 5:09 am on General Comments Aug 2025Is anyone following the Clements case in FL? I just listened to Registry Matters and it sounds like Clements is appealing his habeas case, but this time with legal representation. If that's true, we should be supporting financially. I will go to FAC to learn more, but was surprised not to hear much about this case outside of the pod.
  • No one special September 9, 2025 at 5:06 am on AL: Alabama defends law limiting where sex offenders can goI just hope they remember that the case is brought against the law (as written), not against the state's interpretation of the law. Saw this with the Halloween decorations case where the local pd didn't enforce the law then they changed their tune. An interpretation can always change and no one would know.
  • Athena September 9, 2025 at 4:59 am on General Comments Aug 2025AGREE 100%! The registry laws are OUT OF CONTROL and I am feeling so helpless, and admit to feeling enraged too at times. I do not know what to do about it. Yes I am donating and yes I am involved. I am part of a few groups in IL to support change but (and I hate to say this out loud because it's not in me to be defeatist) it seems futile and like a drop in the ocean. It doesn't feel like we have any one solid direction on this insanity. And I really hate to piss on any of the work done by volunteers in this area because we are all in this awful situation and at least they are doing something, but some of it seems like a waste of time or is so disorganized. Where the F@ck are all the civil rights lawyers in this country (I don't mean our wonderful Janice and ACSOL team) - why aren't they throwing a fit daily? And we as a group are not organized, partly because of fear, and partly because our situation is the best kept secret due to shame. I sat on a zoom Sunday and they have a list of resources but it's under wraps to protect those providing help (housing, counseling, etc). OMG and WTF it took me years to even hear of this group, it's all so underground. I do feel I am losing my mind some days - and as I type this I am in a better place, but sharing that I do understand the rage. Yesterday I even used ChatGPT for therapy LOL and it did a splendid job of empathizing with the hideous nature of the registry in IL and beyond. And one last thing - I walked past the so called daycare that is the cause of our latest pain. I don't know that it's operating. The building is a sh!tty looking apartment, I don't see any signs of children or play equipment, and it doesn't show on google maps. DCFS says the license is valid. Further digging shows whomever owns that building is exempt from paying property tax due to it being assessed as a church, park, or school property, and the cook county tax assessor site will not list the owner. Hmmmm. It all seems very fishy to me. In Chicago...just saying.
  • NYE September 8, 2025 at 10:15 pm on General Comments Aug 2025That's great to know, thanks!
  • Dustin September 8, 2025 at 8:57 pm on AL: Alabama defends law limiting where sex offenders can goSo if I'm understanding correctly, the Alabama legislature removed a few words from their statutes specifically to criminalize normal, mundane activity and conduct by registrants, and the AG is offering essentially a pinky promise that his prosecutors won't take it to extremes. Right....
  • OffYetAngry September 8, 2025 at 8:56 pm on General Comments Aug 2025Your advice is welcome and sage, Athena. It's been nice to have your voice here. Compliance checks are a sore spot for me and something I even wrote about in my Path to Freedom post (https://all4consolaws.org/2022/04/path-to-freedom/comment-page-2/#comment-291270). I find myself navigating through a new headspace of anger lately. Having consulted with an attorney in WA, it sounds like were I to make a move up there, I would have to go back on their registry before I could petition to get off of it. So I spent 20 years on the CA registry for a long-vacated misdemeanor conviction. But it I wanted to move up to WA, I would have to become a PFR all over again. And hire lawyers and spend a year going through another petition in their courts, replete with new compliance checks that I thought I'd never go through again. That's. Just. F--king. Insane! It has just brought to the surface a simmering anger about this complete perversion of justice. The registry laws are completely out of control. I don't need to tell you this as I know you recently went through utter madness with your son's home (I'm so sorry you guys have had to deal with that).
  • Timmmy September 8, 2025 at 8:31 pm on TX: Texas believes failure to register can equate to 25-year murder sentenceSo is involuntary servitude (forcing one to register) as it is not a punishment
  • Athena September 8, 2025 at 6:01 pm on General Comments Aug 2025OffYetAngry, I'm sorry you had to go through this. I don't understand LEOs like this. If they have to do the compliance check per the law or their department policy, why not complete it professionally? What's it to them and why do they behave (sometimes) like barbarians? I don't get it. My recommendation for your anger is let it go. Something is wrong with tiny brained people that feel good about themselves by pretending to be superior to others. They are sad and lead miserable existences.
  • NYE September 8, 2025 at 5:58 pm on General Comments Aug 2025Jeez... thanks so much for sharing your experience. They certainly make you jump through hoops every step of the way. It's good to hope for the best but prepare for the worst. Thanks a lot!
  • David⚜️ September 8, 2025 at 5:40 pm on International Travel 2025That's great to hear, SteveD! It's nice to maybe have that option to revisit GB if I wish to. (And since I am not now, nor have I ever been, Mike Tyson, it's unlikely I would have received any special sports contender allowance/dispensation.🤷🏻‍♂️)
  • David⚜️ September 8, 2025 at 5:35 pm on General Comments Aug 2025@ NYE: No, getting off the CA and FL Registries did not trigger an additional Compliance Check from anyone (CA or FL). Of course, every locale is different, so maybe don't generalize my experience. Always best to be prepared. 😖🙄
  • TS September 8, 2025 at 5:15 pm on General Comments Aug 2025That's a prime example of why you always need to be recording your interactions with them when they come to your front door on your cell phone or something else.
  • OffYetAngry September 8, 2025 at 4:33 pm on General Comments Aug 2025Not sure if you are referring to CA but if so, I can share my experience in Los Angeles. LAPD was obstinate right off the bat. After sitting on the petition for awhile, the detective doing the background report contacted us and said she objected to the way in which the clerk stamped my petition. She said she would not do the background check until the petition was resubmitted to the court and conformed "properly." Accordingly, she blew through her 60-day due date. During this extended wait while we had been communicating with this detective, I was subjected to a boorish, unprofessional compliance check. Almost exclusively, I never received the LEOs during their compliance checks having no obligation to do so. But I knew not receiving them this time would likely bog down the already tardy process. Upon opening my door this time, the female officer started talking extremely loudly about compliance checks, my petition, and other things in an obvious attempt to embarrass me to my neighbors. I was not listed publicly, yet she was trying to betray this, so I got angry and ended their visit by shutting the door in her face after calling her out. The whole thing was so ridiculous. We were in dialog with the investigating detective and could have sent her utility bills and cancelled rent checks at any point. Instead, they sent out a loudmouth officer to make a performative spectacle at my door designed to "out" a non-listed PFR. I will always be curious -- and FURIOUS -- about why the LAPD acted so unprofessionally and obnoxiously. Did this detective hate the idea that PFRs were now able to be delisted? Was she punishing us because we were exasperated by her clerk stamp tantrum? Or perhaps the LAPD just does that final CC as part of their "checklist." I confirmed that the background investigation has some checklist they work through but never saw it. If this was the case, it's possible that the petulant female officer making a scene at my door was just another of the many LEOs who hated the idea that PFRs were starting to delist. And she decided to make my last CC a public spectacle. I am happy she was cut off mid-rant by my front door, but it still pisses me off to this day (as you can see). But so as to not hold up the background investigation they're doing to clear your petition, I strongly advise you receive them and deal with their visit.
  • Janice Bellucci September 8, 2025 at 2:20 pm on UK: A scheme helped prevent sex offenders committing more crimes – then it closed. Why?This is a well written article about efforts in the UK to support both those who have been convicted of a sex offense and those who are in danger of committing a sex offense. According to this article, many people have been helped by an organization that is now out of business. What a tragedy. Still, that organization could be used in the U.S. and other countries as a model of what could and should be done.
  • Robert Curtis September 8, 2025 at 11:13 am on ACSOL In-Person Meeting in West Sacramento on September 13, 2025It has been a long time ago that I came to one of these meetings. I'll try to make it.
  • TS September 8, 2025 at 10:22 am on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActI also want to add @Connie, since this is the 6th Circuit, it applies to all of the 6th Circuit states as well, not just MI (as @Literally nobody alludes to above). This is why when states lose in US District court, they have to weigh whether they will appeal to the Circuit Court they are in or not. Some decisions applied to the states are not going to be supported by other state AGs to fight at the next level.
  • New Person September 8, 2025 at 9:51 am on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActThere are two basic components for the differences in applying Michigan's lawsuit to other states: i. the evolution of the state's registry has become more burdensome to where it can be identified as punitive penalties (must show egregious additional penalties beyond what should be a civil program) ii. the state's recognition of some disabilities iii. is the state SORNA compliant With point (iii), not all states are SORNA compliant. This means if the state was federal funding for the registry, then it must follow SORNA laws to be compliant. A state that is not SORNA compliant is California. With point (ii), Michigan recognizes in-person reporting as a disability (punishment/punitive) as it aligns with the Smith v Doe, 2003 decision. In California, the state does not see in-person reporting as a disability. Thus, in-person reporting is not punitive in California, but California is also not SORNA compliant. With point (i), I think every state can show their current version of the registry has ballooned beyond the original registry implementation. The variance between the current version and original version could be a tipping point in going into a lawsuit. This type of lawsuit will take take as Michiganders are already experiencing. The Does have won this case many years ago, but the implementation of the decision still has not been put into action due to appeals, state new workarounds that fail, and other legal stuff.
  • TS September 8, 2025 at 9:42 am on Domestic Travel 2025@Michael It depends. You can fly out there but don't stay too long or you are going to be screwed for life with FLA hanging all over you like a bad rash with their PFR registry actions. Read the FLA travel laws above under the travel tab for more info on duration, etc.
  • TS September 8, 2025 at 9:40 am on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration Act@Connie MI has fought this in the 6th Circuit, not the 11th Circuit where FLA is and would have any applicable opinions applied. Since it is not a national court, but regional only, it is only precedent in the 6th but can be persuasive elsewhere (but does not have to be as FLA does not like to recognize cases which work against their narrative and actions as seen).
  • Literally nobody September 8, 2025 at 9:32 am on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration Act@Connie: It's unclear if Florida or other states will ever benefit from some of the legal action in Michigan, but there is a chance. At the moment, the best chance is "Does III," the third lawsuit filed by PFRs (people forced to register, or registrants) in Michigan with the ACLU leading the charge. The lawsuit has been mostly focused on ex post facto parts of the registry--when states like Michigan or Florida start adding new hurdles, requirements, or extending time-lines for people who have already been convicted. In Does II, Michigan lost residency requirements for registrants because those were imposed ex post facto (it also lost some other reporting requirements, like e-mail addresses and other internet identities). In Does III, a district judge ruled that Michigan could not put people on the registry for life if they had not been put on for life at sentencing--wiping out a 2011 law. This was appealed by the state, and is currently at Circuit Court (the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is not the circuit Florida is in). We don't know how this is going to wind up--right now, the district ruling is stayed, meaning it is paused, while the three judge Appeals panel decides on this case. This could have ramifications for all states in the Sixth Circuit. It could also get appealed to the Supreme Court, and potentially have ramifications for all PFRs. However, given how these rulings have gone in the past, it will probably only apply to Michigan PFRs whose convictions pre-date 2011. That said, this is creating precedent that should be useful if PFRs in other states choose to file the same type of lawsuit the Does plaintiffs did, with the help of the Michigan ACLU. If I were in another state, I would be trying to copy this legal strategy against any and all ex post facto elements of registration laws in my state.
  • Connie September 8, 2025 at 8:17 am on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActSo if parts of SORNA in Michigain are unconstitutional. Where does this leave Florida and other states? Is it not the same SORNA through out the United States? Trying to understand.
  • Timmmy September 8, 2025 at 8:07 am on TX: Texas believes failure to register can equate to 25-year murder sentenceLeft out: Article I, Section 16No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made.
  • Ghost September 8, 2025 at 8:02 am on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActIf there are warrants out for your arrest, they will be banging on your door, not calling.
  • NYE September 8, 2025 at 8:00 am on General Comments Aug 2025For those of you who have successfully petitioned to get off the registry and got the petition granted, did the petition process trigger one last compliance check during law enforcement's 60-day review window? Just want to be prepared. Thanks.
  • Ghost September 8, 2025 at 8:00 am on TX: Texas believes failure to register can equate to 25-year murder sentenceWhether we like it on not, he did commit a crime. FTR is a crime.
  • SteveD September 7, 2025 at 8:57 pm on International Travel 2025I Went to the UK this April from Brussels via the "Channel" Train to London. I applied for the UK ETA and was granted the approval. It had been more than 2 years since petitioning off the registry for a felony with an underage victim. No hassle at all on entry and exit of the UK.
  • billb September 7, 2025 at 5:48 pm on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActI was just trying to look up information on google and it said Michigan Supreme Court is supposed to have oral arguments on October 8th-9th 2025 if I got this right and it popped up and said it's been an ongoing problem hopefully we get some good news this year just thought I would mention this
  • Michael September 7, 2025 at 2:27 pm on Domestic Travel 2025I want to fly from California to West Palm Beach airports later this year. What is required for Tier 3 Person Forced to Register (PFR)? My sister lives in Port St. Lucie.
  • pat September 7, 2025 at 12:04 pm on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActConstantly! At other family members' homes as well! Good thing the entire family has a reduced expectation of privacy for one family member's 40-year-old incident! Good thing harassment isn't punishment.
  • Athena September 7, 2025 at 11:40 am on General Comments Aug 2025How horrific for that poor 11 yo, and I'm sure not much better for the other five. But "the list" puts these parents on par with people viewing images, teenagers sexting each other, and some poor shmo taking a pee in public.
  • TS September 7, 2025 at 11:36 am on General Comments Aug 2025Adds to the stats which are ignored...
  • TS September 7, 2025 at 11:04 am on General Comments Aug 2025"Frightening and high stupidity" Classic line! Need to keep that alive and going in use as long as this issue exists.
  • MD Registrant September 7, 2025 at 10:34 am on General Comments Aug 2025An 11 yr girl with no prenatal care gave birth at home with 5 other kids and no running water. A neighbor called the authorities but nothing was done. Turns out her step dad is father. Her step dad, mom, and grandma are now in custody.
  • MD Registrant September 7, 2025 at 10:28 am on General Comments Aug 2025Especially when society complains about homelessness, but are fine with forcing a PFR out of their home just because they are black listed. Allowing a PFR to be homeless, jobless, and cut off from support is truly frightening and high stupidity.
  • MiRegied September 7, 2025 at 10:20 am on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActSo i have been getting phone calls (each one has been on a Saturday and Sunday) from private numbers claiming to be MSP telling me that changes have been made and that there are currently warrants out for my arrest. I have checked and i am free of any wants and warrants. Anyone else having to deal with this sh*t?
  • TS September 7, 2025 at 9:37 am on TX: Texas believes failure to register can equate to 25-year murder sentenceIt is all about conformity and nothing else but @James. The rest is moot as you say to which I agree. Just as I pointed out the ladies basketball coach who was convicted recently, @someonewhocares is right in the facts being willfully ignored without a care about the truth. This country cannot continue to be hypocritical about second chances and reform for the better if they continue to be holding onto the thinking they do today about it not applying for all.
  • James September 7, 2025 at 7:59 am on TX: Texas believes failure to register can equate to 25-year murder sentenceBut he committed no crime so your point is moot. He just did not do required gov paperwork. How is the community not safe because he did not do required gov paperwork? If he committed a new sexual offense, then I agree, he did not learn his lesson the first time and then should get some jail time.
  • someone who cares September 7, 2025 at 7:59 am on General Comments Aug 2025@TS - Yep, we all know this, but some just ignore these facts, even though they are also aware that most crimes of sexual nature are committed by someone the victim knows and trusts. Even a commercial from a law firm, talking about sexual abuse, is emphasizing that sexual abuse is mostly committed by teachers, coaches, family members. Nothing new here. But since people are hard to convince PFRs will always be viewed as the perpetrators (despite FACTS proving otherwise).
  • Quiet too long September 7, 2025 at 7:54 am on Digital punishment, lateral surveillance & the sex offense registryThe Registration Act Violates Civil and Constitutional Law — And Private Sector Profit Requires Restitution Disclaimer: This entry documents constitutional harm under survivor-centered doctrine. It does not constitute legal advice. The registration act is not civil. It lacks a harmed party, a compensatory aim, and a remedy. It imposes restraint without contest, without adjudication, and without relief. It violates the doctrines of access, due process, and proportionality. By reusing past criminal outcomes to justify ongoing restraint, the act imposes punishment twice. It functions as digital re-prosecution, not civil oversight. It breaches the Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process protections. The act has enabled private companies to harvest, monetize, and weaponize personal data from state-run registries. Registrants’ names, addresses, and biometric data are posted for profit—without compensation, without contest, and without remedy. This constitutes unjust enrichment, lateral surveillance, and digital punishment. The state cannot outsource punishment to private actors. The registry’s transformation into a commercial archive violates the Takings Clause, the civil law requirement of restitution, and the constitutional guarantee of equal protection. Restitution must be remedied. Every dollar earned from registrant data without consent is a constitutional debt.
  • Athena September 7, 2025 at 7:33 am on General Comments Aug 2025Thank you, Will Allen. I always appreciate your input. We are safe for the moment and looking ahead I want out of IL. Right now I am making $ and someone has to pay for this f-ing nonsense, so I will stay put. But we need a state that allows us to at least live with stable housing. Yes, the RASTs will have all their other fun not allowing employment, attempting compliance checks and harassment, mandating reporting etc etc. But being forced out of a stable housing situation seems about the most un-American (back when America meant something) thing you can do to a person. The property he was ousted from is owned by an LLC, which is owned by the three of us (mom, dad, pfr) so I feel we figured that out as best as possible and will continue that strategy. Also, I am looking into the "home daycare" that is the reason for our current pain. I will verify it is actually in operation, but not sure CPD cares what I find out.
  • Silence Do good September 7, 2025 at 5:43 am on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActHi everyone, Here is an update directly from Pacer. Here is an update that I found on Pacer BRIEFING LETTER SENT by Mediation Office, resetting briefing schedule: first brief now due 09/17/2025. second brief now due 10/20/2025. third brief now due 11/19/2025. 25-1413 25-1414 (LMR). I also wanted to express my concern so please don't take this personally. Some of the posts I read have absolutely nothing to do with the Lawsuit or people post misinformation it gets frustrating when I am trying to find relevant information regarding the lawsuit as like many others there is a lot at stake here.
  • ACSOL Reader September 7, 2025 at 1:06 am on Automated Sextortion Spyware Takes Webcam Pics of Victims Watching PornSextortion has been on the rise, and sadly, PFR are not treated as victims when they fall prey to it. This leads to lack of reporting and an increase in the potential for self-harm or successful extortion. If this happens to a PFR the threats can be elevated due to the threats of prison or of fabricated allegations. PFR are sadly the perfect target for this type of extortion, and that should be recognized by law enforcement and politicians.
  • TS September 6, 2025 at 9:40 pm on General Comments Aug 2025A jury convicted a former girl's basketball coach Friday on charges related to sexual assaults on three of his players over the course of a decade. Position of trust...Not registered...
  • Quiet too long September 6, 2025 at 7:39 pm on General Comments Aug 2025"The Contaminated Substructure" By Quiet too long The nutrients have sunk into oblivion, spoiling the soil and infecting the juvenile substructure of the root system. The apes are dealing with the torment of the displaced humanelesses, for the funds of revenge and hate override all hope. No water from the funds of hope ever reaches it. They seep down, - until stress arises in the whole. The attempt to create false boundaries to contain, - runs out. They are the drain on the whole, for restrictions placed in directional displacement. The stress is visible. The surrounding area feels it. They are many. They are united by root systems. They connect. When one shows stress, others notice. They see. They know. And they attack to save the whole!, - they have webs and structure. They operate without the abilities to form hate or remorse or place faux upon others for express gratifications, - only a justifiable communion that is documented truth. The tree is now stressed, hoping the apes will eat the parasites from the webs that are affecting it. It will be a hard task for the apes, cornered into the treason they incurred. To wit: all the little ignored pieces of fauceted scripture have almost suffered into their families and into their pews. And humaneless has never found the way of unservitude. While all the servitude to be answered for— is immensely ignored. However, truth is hard to ignore. So the web is truth. And you! You are, abound to it. One way or the other
  • TS September 6, 2025 at 7:14 pm on General Comments Aug 2025While it is true third parties are making money off of our predicament, the courts will always say that they can't control what the people do with the information once it's gone public, which is their escape hatch of any sort of accountability.
  • Want to Travel September 6, 2025 at 7:02 pm on International Travel 2025Update on my cruise for those interested. Just got back yesterday. No issues from Carnival at all. Boarded without any issues. Was treated just like any other guest. Was able to get off at the port in Ensenada without any issues. Went through the off-boarding process and walked right through like every other guest. Upon return to Long Beach, went right through customs without any issues. No secondary, no abnormal questions…just scanned my cruise card and checked my birth certificate and drivers license and let me right on through. A couple of people ahead of us in line got sent to secondary so I know they were definitely screening some people extra carefully. This was different from my past cruises while I was registered. I was always allowed to go on the cruises and even get off at all ports (Mexico, Bahamas, Haiti, couple of others) but always got thrown to secondary screening upon return. To recap, crime was over 20 years ago. Misdemeanor, just probation, no jail time. Status Never posted online. Expunged several years ago. COR 4 years ago. Registration obligation removed by judge. Hoping this is the new norm for me but wondering if I just got lucky. I’ll try another cruise in the new year to compare results.
  • Quiet too long September 6, 2025 at 4:53 pm on General Comments Aug 2025"The Canopy of Literature" By Quiet too long  And now the treat of shade and awe comes sprouting out in total green, shading all of what may be. Some are small. Others are large. The swaying motions of literature begin to form, - interweaving faucets that balance order. The apes and the humaneless are intrigued. They embellish these faucets with all they remember. They study them. But not all is deemed useful. The apes, restricted by their own enforcements, caged in corners for refusing the scriptures fought for by many, decide to discard what they think does not belong. They flush these texts to the awaiting roots of despair. And the roots, - once resilient, - are now contaminated by the wrongdoings of the apes. Forever displaced. Forever tainted.
  • PO'd Registered Citizen September 6, 2025 at 4:07 pm on UK: A scheme helped prevent sex offenders committing more crimes – then it closed. Why?Chemical castration is absolutely barbaric and the idea should've never entered the discussion at all.
  • Will Allen September 6, 2025 at 3:24 pm on General Comments Aug 2025You are correct to advise people to be very wary of asking questions to just any AI system. You really need to know which AI can be trusted to ask what kinds of questions. And then verify what it tells you. Having said that, you said, "AI only gathers info from the internet". That is too general of a statement to fully judge but it is pretty much 100% incorrect. "AI" is a huge area. There might be some specialized, odd, interesting/weird AI system which "only gathers info from the internet", but that statement is 100% incorrect for all of the well known AI systems (e.g. ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, Grok, etc.). Also, piles of people are working hard on creating AI systems specifically for law. LexisNexis is. The technology is already readily available to create those systems right now such that they are much, much better than human intelligence. They will be able to aggregate, correlate, and analyze legal facts faster than lightning and it will be better and more accurate than any human could ever do. That can be done today. Frankly, I'd be surprised if LexisNexis does not already offer AI. And those capabilities will be amazing right from the start. And they'll be trustworthy, more trustworthy than humans. But they will not be able to do, as well, some things which humans can do. Not initially, at least.
  • Will Allen September 6, 2025 at 3:16 pm on TX: Texas believes failure to register can equate to 25-year murder sentenceFannin County, Texas -- On August 27, 2025, Fannin County First Assistant Criminal District Attorney, Nathan Young, suffered a large personal failure. He sent a person to prison for a Sex Registry violation. Nathan Young helped a criminal regime commit a crime and he is a criminal. He is an enemy of good, moral Americans. Nathan Young also demonstrated his ignorance and/or immorality when he stated that the Sex Registries are "a service that helps keep our community safe". He's clueless and/or he is a liar. Nathan Young committed an act of violence against an American and his family. He deserves severe consequences. For all the rest of us that weren't involved, he signed us up to pay to take care of this man, likely for the rest of his life. We all might end up having to support part of his family as well. It will surely cost us some millions of dollars, all just so some pathetic a**holes can jerk off with their Sex Registries and act like big government needs to hold their hands to get them through life. I should also point out that Nathan Young has put a lot more Americans in a lot more danger. There is a risk that a PFR will be arrested for some FTR. There is now an even greater risk than before that a PFR will know that he/she needs to retaliate simply for being arrested. Some of them will choose to do that in a very dangerous and harmful manner. Without doubt. The Sex Registries are delivering that danger and harm daily. But are they protecting anyone? Good job, Nathan Young. You are an un-American traitor and garbage a**hole. I'm praying you get what you deserve.
  • Will Allen September 6, 2025 at 3:09 pm on TX: Texas believes failure to register can equate to 25-year murder sentenceI would never compare it to a murder sentence either. This guy could commit FTR 100 times and I wouldn't compare it to a murder sentence. Because what this guy did didn't harm anyone, put anyone in danger, or do anything. If nothing else, it just gave some government employee losers a little bit of extra work to do so they can try to justify their lame jobs. That's about it. Murder, on the other hand, is harmful. So no, I would never compare FTR to murder. Except to show that FTR is way over punished.
  • Will Allen September 6, 2025 at 3:08 pm on TX: Texas believes failure to register can equate to 25-year murder sentenceI suppose, but why? Because Registry A**holes/Supporters/Terrorists are truly stupid and ignorant? This guy didn't Register and what effect did that have? None. A big, fat nothing. It didn't harm anyone. So why would anyone think he needed to Register? Or that more people do? Or that anyone does? Why would people think MORE of what failed is needed? Only fools think that Registries improve public safety or protect children. Personally, I don't think that is why Registries exist either. I think they exist to harass families, make dumb a**holes feel better, and make some people too much money. That is really why they exist.
  • Will Allen September 6, 2025 at 3:00 pm on General Comments Aug 2025@Athena: I responded to this comment right when it first came out and I saw my comment here. But that was right before the server crash and the comment was lost. Probably just as well, because I was extremely angry and unhinged. I find it beyond outrageous that anyone thinks this is acceptable. Literally anyone. Beyond that, the stupidity of it is just stunning. I can't even speak to "people" who think "residency restrictions" are intelligent at all. And even much worse, any "person" who thinks it is okay to force someone to move from an existing home. I feel like I'm talking to some kind of brainless animal. Like a fish or something. Just can't do it. I only want to slap them upside their empty, vapid heads. I don't think I have any great practical advice about how to fight this crime for any good, near-term results. Obviously, all good Americans should be fighting against "residency restrictions" every day. But any wins are going to take a while. The only thing solid I would say to do right now is I think your son should keep a very mobile living situation and do not ever, ever allow the criminals to do "compliance checks". That is the least that should be done. Heck, I might get a camper and park it at a friend's home. I would live there but I would never allow law enforcement to get near me there. They could leave their "please call" cards all they like and I would never contact them back. I think it is important that all PFRs establish very well that LE will not be able to contact them or expect it. That makes it much easier to be as mobile as you like. But every U.S. citizen should remember to never underestimate the goal of government employees, especially law enforcement, to be useless a**holes who might be trying to track you for no good reason. Always assume that they are trying. Offhand, I'd say if a person is going to live in a state that is as fascist as Illinois regarding this, then I think the best solution must be to buy all of the land around you. Where I live, that is not too difficult. In a big city, it would take a ridiculous amount of money even to buy in slums. But in the right parts of America, it is very achievable. You might have to create a C Corp to own most of the property and then just personally own/live in a "lot" right in the middle of it. But it is certainly doable. With 1,000 feet "restrictions", it seems like around 25 acres would be good. Get that, divide it up so you only live in the middle few acres and have another entity own the "outsides". I'd also like to mention that when the Criminal Regime of Georgia passed their "restrictions" some years back, they forced a PFR out of a home he'd lived in for a decade and he retaliated by murdering 5 year old Christopher Barrios. That murder was committed by the Criminal Regime and their key criminals like former Representative Jerry Keen. Who, BTW, is a piece of garbage who will end up burning in Hell. Georgia's "restrictions" have murdered other children also. Melinda Hinson is another. But of course Registry A**holes/Supporters/Terrorists (RASTs) are too stupid to understand that and too arrogant to care. Lastly, I'd just like to say that RASTs are enemies of good Americans. No one should be treating them like humans. No one should have concern for their welfare or the welfare of their families. They are attacking, harassing, terrorist enemies. We are being far, far, far too accepting and nice to RASTs. They deserve direct consequences and war.
  • Quiet too long September 6, 2025 at 2:47 pm on General Comments Aug 2025"The Blizzard Beneath the Tree" By Quiet too long  As the tree ages and the branches grow, the apes, - still civically entwined in twisted masses of revenge-bent limbs, - decide an outcome to outsmart the Group of the humaneless before it begins: a blizzard to test the stability of the tree as a whole. So the roots wait. Invisible to law, untouched by civility. Until the day comes, - eighteen years have passed, and the blizzard begins. Tests whirl around them, daunting, cold, relentless. Some are accepted. Others must endure more reforms. Then spring arrives. Forty percent of the root system joins the smallest branches, in hopes of becoming unlike the twisted limbs that encircle and trap the aging apes. And all is called humane. As we all know, - tests just don’t lie? But the tree remembers. It was not shelter. It was a trial before the diseases could infiltrate the tree.
  • Quiet too long September 6, 2025 at 12:13 pm on General Comments Aug 2025A Citizen’s Outlook: "The Tree of Solitude" By Quiet too long, When civil law is handed to apes, they see not justice but a tree - its branches wide with solitude. One group is cast from the largest limbs; told it is humane. But the apes do not see - they too may one day, cling to the smallest twigs, stripped of shade and shelter. To the humaneless, it becomes clear: what was called fair play was nothing more than Treason!, - humane in word, exclusion in deed. The tree was not protected. It was betrayed. For the worded branches, - those laws dressed in civility, - began to twist and distort the apes’ ways. What once offered shelter now obscures the path. And those who shaped the tree may never find their way back.
  • New Person September 6, 2025 at 9:17 am on General Comments Aug 2025Good thing there is an academic paper (Digital punishment, lateral surveillance & the sex offense registry) identifying third parties making monies on our misery, which is a factor in citing the registry has now gone beyond its civil means and is now punishment!
  • billb September 6, 2025 at 6:21 am on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActI haven't heard of that but thank you for the information we done a Google search on it ,and what we found the damages you could receive is under $10,000 I'm not sure how accurate that is or possible maybe if there is multiple constitutional violations it maybe that per violation?? thoughts or updates
  • Warpath September 6, 2025 at 3:43 am on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActHmmmm ‘I will ask my attorney about this. Thanks for the tip
  • Punkskater12 September 5, 2025 at 9:06 pm on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActI could probably answer thst but I’m not 💯 but I’m pretty sure it only impacts those pre 2011 that had their registration extended from 25 to lifetime and those that were sentenced to lifetime before 2011. Now as far as punishment aspect goes i cant say for sure. Most of us already did jail, prison, or probation, or parole time. If not mistaken thats punishment in itself for crime committed. So to further punishment by applying the registry to someone and making it condition of probation or parole try make it seem as all 1 sentenceing, i don’t think should fly. Probation any other time already has set statutes to apply to someone who committed a crime. But for sex crimes to slip “comply with the Sora” as a condition cant be treated as a probation condition considering the registry is its own set of rules and is also considered punishment. So to force it is punishment twice for same crime.
  • Punkskater12 September 5, 2025 at 8:59 pm on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActIt’s not a matter of whether I’ve done it or not. We are all aware the state and government preys on the naive individuals thst no almost nothing of the laws, acts, bills, and constitution. Did anyone even know if the Tucker Act before I mentioned it? Im providing information people may or may not know. Like people assume because most government has sovereign immunity they can’t be sued. Wrong. They can’t be sued by another state or country. However our own state we are allowed to sue. Caviat is is they have to accept the suit and waive their immunity. Although Tucker Act is a way around thst. Just as Goldsmith ruled the registry is unconstitutional and we are forced to adhere to it. So it’s open season for monetary lawsuits.
  • Warpath September 5, 2025 at 11:33 am on MI: ACLU Sues State Officials for the Fourth Time over Unconstitutional Michigan Sex Offender Registration ActCan we assume you’ve successfully accomplished this?
  • pat September 5, 2025 at 10:49 am on General Comments Aug 2025and... most likely the reason they took so long to do this...
  • pat September 5, 2025 at 10:47 am on General Comments Aug 2025What is the statute of limitations for rape? of a minor?
  • pat September 5, 2025 at 10:41 am on General Comments Aug 2025Yes, and is that not what SCOTUS used, artificial intelligence, when it relied on "frightening and high" to steal constitutionally protected rights from millions of people under the guise of public safety, which is not their duty. Ensuring equal protection under the law is.
  • No One September 5, 2025 at 10:33 am on Australia: Even in Death, the Punishment Continues: The Registry That Doesn’t Let GoI was thinking the same thing. This person sounds like she isn't sane and needs help.
  • pat September 5, 2025 at 10:28 am on General Comments Aug 2025REALLY starting to make me wonder if this statement is the truth in plain sight all along... Was the initial registration signed voluntarily (with consent)? How is anyone bound by any legal instrument without his consent (signature)? That would explain both how and why they are getting away with all this. It makes the famous "Price Club" statement perfectly accurate, where nothing else does. hmmm...
  • TS September 5, 2025 at 10:07 am on General Comments Aug 2025In this case of Marbury, the outcome established SCOTUS (Judiciary) on par with the Executive and Legislative branches in their power of review (checks/balances) and chief interpreter of the US Constitution. Therefore, they want to poke holes in it with exceptions, they can and no one can tell them differently.
  • New Person September 5, 2025 at 9:50 am on General Comments Aug 2025Q: Since when can a civil remedy abridge constitutionally protected rights? A: Since SCOTUS said PFR's are irredeemable with a, now known false fact of, "Frightening and High" 80% recidivism rate. If they are irredeemable, then they have no constitutional protections since they cannot control themselves and a plague to society as a whole. The 2003 Smith v Doe decision brainwashed the whole judicial system and the country at-large. Which, consequently, brainwashed the whole world. Paint a person or group as Hitler and the masses are willing to overlook transgressions. Even the 13th Amendment protections has been trampled upon: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." Once we are out of custody, then we are supposed to regain our rights as free citizens. Instead, we are still subjected to the state's will with in-person reporting, restrictions of movement, and/or restrictions of residency. This forced coercion under color of law is involuntary servitude that was applied after a sex crime conviction. No other conviction has these extra terms of being forced to registry. And since the registry is not categorized as "punishment", then the registry is unconstitutional!
  • Ghost September 5, 2025 at 9:26 am on General Comments Aug 2025One, you do know what AI stands for right? Artificial Intelligence. Two, AI only gathers info from the internet, which at best is iffy. Three, research laws, then fight them.
  • MD Registrant September 5, 2025 at 9:24 am on General Comments Aug 2025Price Club of having the government take away your rights, while the public claps like blind seals. No offense to seals
  • Ghost September 5, 2025 at 9:23 am on International Travel 2025What made you think that?
  • New Person September 5, 2025 at 9:21 am on General Comments Aug 2025Even when you are off the registry, you are still beholden to it outside of your de-registered state. It's like the conclusion to the song "Hotel California".... Last thing I remember, I was running for the door. I had to find the passage back... to the place I was before. "Relax," said the night man. "We are programmed to receive. You can checkout anytime you like, but you can never leave!"
  • Ghost September 5, 2025 at 9:20 am on International Living 2025Have you looked into Albania's law on who has to register there?