CA: Posting mugshots on internet draws criminal charges from California attorney general

[sacbee.com 5/16/18]

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra on Thursday filed extortion and money laundering charges against the owners of a website that publishes mugshot photos and charges a fee to remove them.

His office is targeting Mugshots.com, which pulls photos and identifying information about criminal suspects from law enforcement departments around the country. The site charges a “de-publishing fee” to remove someone from its archives, according to Becerra’s office.

Becerra said it has frustrated people who were accused of crimes they did not commit.

“This pay-for-removal scheme attempts to profit off of someone else’s humiliation,” Becerra said. “Those who can’t afford to pay into this scheme to have their information removed pay the price when they look for a job, housing, or try to build relationships with others. This is exploitation, plain and simple.”

Read more

Related links:

Use copyright law to battle mugshot extortion [abajournal.com 3/27/18]

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

31 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“Those who can’t afford to pay into this scheme to have their information removed pay the price when they look for a job, housing, or try to build relationships with others. This is exploitation, plain and simple.”

How is this any different from people in the registry? After all, some states make you pay a “fee” just for the privilege of being on the registry. Why isn’t that exploitation or a shakedown?

Well maybe this is the start of something good?

What about sites like homefacts.com? Doesn’t the (CA at least) Megan’s law website prohibit the re-posting of such information to begin with? Why doesn’t the state of CA take their own laws seriously? If it is a crime for me to view the Megan’s law website, how are they not endangering me by putting the same information on a space where I can easily view this supposedly illegal (for me) information?

Looks like these people are getting a taste of what it’s like to be on the SO registry. Hopefully this event will somehow connect to SO registry photo exploitation and the damage it causes. Hopefully.

This is excellent news. Looks like karma is finally catching up to those SOBs. My mugshot comes up 1st in a Google search of my name thanks to their website. I hope their fellow travelers take note of this.

Man i need a citation to the actual complaint or indictment to be able to use this against them….Anyone????

So, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra is admitting that publishing this type of information results in problems when “they look for a job, housing, or try to build relationships with others”?

How can he justify the sex offender registry doing this to people for life even after serving their court ordered sentence and returning to the public? Is spite of any laws, they are still discriminated against and the AG is admitting that. This needs to be used against California to stop people from being on any type of registry without proper Substantive Due Process to keep off those that don’t need that type of punishment and discrimination. You can use his own words against him.

2 owners were just arrested in FLORIDA

So if the registry is abolished, the internet will still hold our information. There will need to be a lot of clean. This will have to be part of the restitution. It’s like the unexploded ordinance still plaguing countries like Viet Nam.