California RSOL Challenges Websites in Federal District Court

California Reform Sex Offender Laws (CA RSOL) filed a lawsuit in federal district court today challenging websites which identify individuals as sex offenders and include their personal information including names, photos, and home addresses as well as demand up to $500 for removal of that information from the websites. Offendex – Press Release

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Janice, you ought to put an office in the Federal Court building there in L.A.! Fantastic news. The only reason these sites were able to hang around was because of the public’s acceptance of the heaps of abuse poured upon sex offenders and their families.

Now, Offendex has been sued before, but the perpetrator who runs the site has not accepted a subpoena. Hopefully with a federal lawsuit alleging criminal charges, the ****s won’t have anywhere to go to but to answer to the judge.

Any chance we can see the actual complaint? Thanks!

Eric we need to clear something up here. The ****’s have nothing to do with this. In the beginning of our investigation many people were frantically trying to get ahold of information and because of this the ****’s were mistakenly implicated as the owners of these sites. So let’s not start this up again about the ****’s as they have been through enough already. Thank you Eric.


I apologize, my information was obtained from previous court document sources. You indeed are correct. There is a lot more to the story and involvement, but legally, ethically, and morally, certain elements are not in the picture.

It’s just that we’ve been looking at this issue separately for over a year and unearthed several borderline legal, but still actionable, activities, but we didn’t have the resources to fully investigate and consider a true case in which the only way to fight it is, in fact, with non-current registrants and their families as litigants, and with the legal firepower of a consolidated federal case.

Janice, you are heaven-sent. I just got my COR and now have to deal with all these websites. I am donating $500 to your cause, instead of those freaky sites.

I hope you can get all of them. I’ve been trying without success to get my name off these, via emails and contact forms:

The only one that complied was

Dear latest anon as of March 21st at 11:09am: Take heart. I was able to have myself removed from city-data and homefacts due to the fact that I am no longer required to register. I am a participant in this lawsuit and Janice Bellucci is a Godsend. I hope these s***heads rot in hell, and I will be there when they are convicted of racketeering, false light, defamation, slander, extortion, and the like.

What would we need to do to be included in this lawsuit if it helps to have more plaintiffs. My wife and daughter are directly affected by my status as an RSO and how these sites come up anytime my name is searched.

have those people replied to this ?

This bit at the bottom of sorarhive’s offender pages might be construed as spreading libel, if the offender is no longer listed on the Megan’s Law website:

To Share ‘s Sex Offender Record from Orange CA On Facebook Just Click The Facebook Icon directly above the sex offenders photo.