Living with 290: Things must change

First, as I think back regarding my journey, I can only think about how much I regret putting myself in the situation I put myself in.

Today, over 18 years later, I’m still so disappointed. When I initially was referring with my counsel, I was informed (I plead to a wobbler) that once the charge was reduced to a misdemeanor, I would no longer have to register. He confirmed this!I later found out this was incorrect. I went back to court, had the court reduced to a misdemeanor, charge eventually expunged and the plea is considered an other (non disclosable). I really got on with my life.

Although, as time goes on, it seems like life is becoming increasingly difficult. There are new laws coming on the books yearly which honestly make life less manageable. Then, when I heard about the residency restrictions (my plea was adult oriented), I was in shock. Now, we have bans at parks and beaches? I would have never guessed. I can still recall when California initially put the web site up? I was in shock. OMG, this is terrible. I was initially put on the web site (incorrect), but immediately faxed my legal documents to Ca and it was removed. I truly feel sorry for those who have their names and addresses plastered online. I really don’t know how or what they feel.

Presently, the only hope I have is that new laws will be incorporated that will allow people to fall off the registry, a tier system is instituted and people have a chance to live both a productive and free lifestyle in the future. Things must change.

- - - - - - - - -

View all user submitted stories about Living with 290. Feel free to add yours - as a registrant, family member or friend. Please submit any updates on your story via the comments section on this page. Please use the comments below ONLY for input on the story on this page. To add a new story, click here.

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

One can only hope rational minds will eventually realize that these laws have gone way to far. Nobody that’s not on the list could be possibly fathom what we have to deal with on a daily basis for a lifetime. At the very least they need to pass to the tier registry bill so people can move on with their lives. Currently, it is nearly impossible to do that now. Is this what they really intended?

I first need to address the fact that in most states, you eventually fall off the registry. The timespan changes, depending upon the offense, but minor offenses would result in a 10-15 year duration and so on. So, its difficulty to imagine how those convicted of misdemeanors and summary probation would (myself/yes/SUMMARY) probation would continue to remain on the registry. I’m clearly not a victim, but we punish (rehabilitate/jail/prison) those who offend and subsequently put them on probation or parole thereafter. So, the big question is this? Does the judicial system believe in rehabilitation? I mean, if not, why not just let everyone go free? Is sending someone to jail just a procedure? If you look at what’s happening now (no laws regarding sex offenders), its pretty obvious city leaders or legislators don’t believe in rehabilitation? It’s sad, but their actions say otherwise? So, rather than focus upon creating harsher penalties and limitations for those released from prison, maybe they should be more focused upon how they can better rehabilitate those in need?