Lariat Letter: Sex offenders are human beings too

In response to David Trower’s Nov. 12 column “Sex offenders need stronger punishments,” I feel disappointed that Trower would write something that relies on thoroughly debunked stereotypes, faulty statistics and emotional appeals, yet fails to even acknowledge or address the root causes of the issue of sexual abuse.

Trower’s viewpoint is typical of those who adhere to the “uncontrollable monster” myth of the American Sex Offender. It is a persistent myth dating back to the late 1800s and the serial killings of Jack the Ripper and HH Holmes. (In fact, sex offenders were referred to as “Rippers” during that era). Today, the “stereotypical sex offender” is still the shady and dirty old man in the wrinkly trench coat, who drives a rusty van and lures children with candy and puppies.

However, there are a number of ways someone can land on today’s sex offender registry. In Texas, children as young as age 10 are listed on the public registry. A survey from the Dallas Morning News in 2009 found over 4,000 juveniles on the Texas Registry.

People can land on the list a variety of ways. A teenage girl taking a nude picture of herself can be convicted of “production of child pornography.” The boyfriend she sends the picture to can be charged with possession of child pornography. If you are drunk while tailgating, and you can’t make it to the Porta-Potty, you better urinate on yourself, lest you land on the list for indecent exposure.

The point is that not everyone on that list is there for the kind of things we tend to think of when we here that term “sex offender.”

Trower’s argument is an appeal to emotion. Using the dubious claim that so few “rapists” are brought to justice and the viewpoint that anyone subjected to sexual abuse is forever scarred, he claims this should justify taking a human life. Trower’s viewpoint insults and degrades many sex crime victims who have risen above the abuse and have overcome whatever pain or difficulties they have faced to live productive lives.

Samantha Geimer (who we call a “rape victim”) proclaimed in her memoir that America’s “Victim Industry” seeks to prevent those who have endured sexual abuse from healing because we need lifelong victims to justify increasingly harsh penalties for even the pettiest of offenses.

Those on the sex offender registry are human beings. Some have done really bad things, some have made stupid decisions and some are on there because of an overzealous system that feels it is better to lock up a hundred innocent men than to let one guilty man go free.

We have executed innocent men in this country. We have incarcerated people for decades before DNA testing exonerated them from any wrongdoing.

Perhaps Trower would love to speak with Leslie Blanton of Port Angeles, Wash. Mrs. Blanton has to raise her children without their father Gary, a man who, at age 17, had consensual sexual relations with another teen, and was added to the public registry. The man who killed Gary did so because Gary’s name was on that registry.

The killer was a career criminal with 47 separate convictions dating back to 1994 for drug crimes, assaults and burglaries. This career criminal was considered a “hero” in the eyes of the public. Many wanted the killer freed.

The only execution needed in this day and age is the sex offender registry. The registry manufactures crime and peddles fear to the people while neglecting the root causes of sexual abuse. A generation of increasingly tough approaches have failed, so it is time to select evidence-based methods rather than relying on reactionary emotion-based laws.

By Derek Logue – Derek Logue is an advocate for registered citizens and is a registered sex offender.

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  18. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  19. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  20. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Very good letter, Derek. I think it reads very well.

People who say this or that should be done to “sex offenders” are grade A idiots. Shallow thinkers.