Are Sex Offender Registries Effective?

MARYLAND – It gives a sense of security for many parents – having access to the state’s sex offender registry. “It’s a way for us to be safe as parents for our children. I use an app to find out if there’s any in the neighborhood. That’s what my sister and I did before, and we actually found some. So we would know to keep an eye out, especially for my daughter that I’m worried about,” Christie Sarminto said. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

3 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Finally something that makes sense. The sex offender registry is just a tool to publicly shame and harass the registrants and their families. Hopefully, California will follow in the steps of Maryland and realize the registry does not prevent sex abuse. All it does is empower the “high and might” to exact revenge through vigilante violence and allows the registrant and their family members to live in fear for the rest of their lives.

Is this even a legitimate question anymore? I don’t want to sound like a broken record, but are we (the entirety of humanity) really that logically bankrupt to believe the opinions of others (laws, rules, regulations, and so on….) will truly prevent anyone from doing whatever they want if they really wanted to do something?

Tracking people does nothing.

Forbidding something drives certain people to want to do it more.

Just because someone has information or access to it does not mean that information will be used effectively. Anyone who has been through or is currently in a sex offender counseling program understands what I am talking about. If they don’t, take a look at the workbook and/or handouts (if you have them or ever get them). Then try rationalizing what is said about the planning of many “offenses” and explain why if a general consensus has been reached regarding the pre-offense process no significant steps have been taken to intervene before another person gets labeled a sex offender and creates a new so called victim or victimizes someone again.

That’s the saddest and most disturbing part, we already possess some basic knowledge and skills to begin reducing the occurrences of all objectionable behavior. Yet everyone is worrying about managing those who were caught. I won’t give anyone idea’s but let’s just say in conjunction with professional strategies other resources are in plain sight waiting to be utilized and those resources are the best options for raising awareness, providing unfiltered raw truths, and preventing future offenses.