MURRIETA: City may repeal Child Safety Zone Ordinance

The Murrieta City Council this week will consider repealing an ordinance approved in 2009 that made it illegal for sex offenders to loiter within 300 feet of an area frequented by children: parks, arcades, swimming pools, skateboard parks, etc. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Another city council scared sensible by the threat of a Frank & Janice lawsuit!
Cheers for Frank’s courage and Janice’s tenacity!
Cheers for Justice!!

Thanks Janice and Frank.

This child safety zone laws are not needed. I whom have had child rated offense do not have any desire to hang at anyplace where there is a bunch of kids. The only time I ever, go to the park is when my church has gathering, other wise I do not go the park. All RC that ever had SO treatment knows that they are to void kid hang outs and most RC obey. The sickos that are going stalk kids are going do it and do not care if there is a law, against it.

Awesome!!Another one bites the dust.

Another great victory for us all thanks to Frank and Janice and staff. I realy think that any city or county or state that create such laws should also be sued for monetary damages caused by denying access to tax paying citizens from public places since we all paid for such places. Just another angle that I think is a legitimate issue that could be pursued to prevent or stop these type of laws in the future.

The council discussed the matter from 7:15-7:30. Repeal passed unanimously. There was no mention of attorneys fees.

The ignorant comment continue in the online comments section of the actual article.

From what I gather, from those comments, ALL people see, in their mind’s eye” when they hear “sex offender”, is some wild eyed troll jumping out of the bushes and dragging little Mary or Johnny off to their cave to have their way with them.

That is all they see and all they care to see.

They have no clue that there is a wide Varity of offenses that can someone put on the registry that do not involve attacking children or anyone else for that matter.

Very frustrating.