The Failure of Sex Offender Policy (Opinion)

The public expects and deserves evidence-based practices when it comes to public safety. This is true for any aspect of public policy but perhaps none so much as sex offender policy. With sex offenders, there is a sense of moral outrage at the depravity of their crimes, and rightly so. Virtually any sex crime makes the news headlines because the public has a very high interest in this crime. Too often politicians not only capitalize on the fear that is caused by sex offenders, but they inadvertently create more of it. Full Opinion Piece

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Wow another great article.

This guy almost makes me want to move to Massachusetts. He needs to start educating other politicians on the truth!

I think this guy needs more education on this issue. I will however say this; he is ignorant just enough that his thinking may catch on with other equally ignorant flag waving politicians, and that would be a good thing. I think the smartest thing he said was

“The critical element that has been left out is the use of the research.”

I think someone should send him a copy of Alex Landon & Elaine Halleck’s book “A Parallel Universe.” A top notch and well researched book. Then instead of making statements from an emotional standpoint, he could actually display depth and weight; he could talk with the authority of one that is truly educated on the subject.

It’s pretty obvious he needs to do a little more “research.” But he sure does sound good!

I have spoken with this gentleman on a number of occasions and I find him to be very intelligent and unafraid to tackle controversial issues such as ours. Rather than criticize any shortcomings in his writings, being that he has never had to walk our walk nor owes registered citizens anything, I would begin any dialogue with an appreciation for the courage it requires to risk the wrath of haters who might accuse him of being soft on offenders or a lover of… There may come a time in his political career when the opposition throws these writings in his face.

If there is something you might like him to become aware of, you should drop him a respectable email. Now that would be a positive and I would encourage him to please keep writing objectively on this matter.