Should People With Criminal Histories Be Banned From Public Housing?

We often talk about the “three-strikes rules” that came about in the 1990s—“tough on crime” federal laws that remanded people convicted of three felony convictions to life in prison.

Only one strike is needed, in many circumstances, however, to get banned from public housing. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“Should People With Criminal Histories Be Banned From Public Housing?”

I think not; especially because of the fact that this country has 5% of the people in the world and 25% of it’s prisoners. This country destroys more lives by way of their so called “justice system. Most people refer to it as the “state prison industrial complex.”

Most of the victims of said “state prison industrial complex” have wives and children. That means they would be denied housing assistance also. Does anyone think they would stop there? I don’t think so, as this nation is run by mad men/women who thrive on the dollars the arms industry and wars brings in. They will grab all they can and it still won’t be enough.

The leaders of this land should take heed of the warning from God they just received through the Pope.

https://theintercept.com/2015/09/24/pope-decries-shameful-culpable-silence-arms-sales-drenched-innocent-blood/

Banning people from living in public housing is a bad idea. Registered citizens often have reduced incomes which in turn reduces their ability to rent a place to live. The sensible solution therefore is to provide, rather than ban, registrants with public housing.

Implement changes now.
It would be in the public interest to know where your registry of citizens actually live…
Also the benefit of less crime when facts show and prove far less relapse than others…
It would be in the public interest for HUD assistance to apply especially to state registered citizens…
Isn’t that why you have a public policy of ‘registered’ so you know where they live…? HUD assistance should apply OR one’s alleged past not be considered for housing with HUD.
Changes…reforms to housing are indeed needed now…
Its in the public interest to do so.

Why hasn’t the ACLU or Janice Bellucci filed a class action lawsuit on this !!!