Educating Attorneys That they CAN WIN – Las Vegas, NACDL, November 19-20, 2015

RSOL is excited to announce that Janice Bellucci will lead our exhibit at the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers’ (NACDL) Sex Crimes Training Seminar in Las Vegas. This exhibit is a fantastic opportunity for RSOL to network with and appeal to attorneys to join with us because the NACDL is the premier national organization of defense lawyers. We often hear that RSOL should clone Ms. Bellucci so that we can file challenges across the country. We agree, and believe that she is the best person to represent us at the NACDL Seminar. RSOL Board of Directors member Larry Neely will be with her.

Janice will discuss the many lawsuits she has settled in California regarding proximity restrictions and emphasizes that nearly all of those settlements have resulted in the defendants paying attorney’s fees. Those fees have enabled her to engage in additional litigation that otherwise would have been impossible without direct funding from the litigants themselves.

Very recently Ms. Belluci filed a lawsuit against the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) challenging their requirement that parolees post signs on Halloween. After being served the lawsuit, the CDCR announced that it would not enforce the sign requirement this year. Janice intends to continue that lawsuit until either the court rules against her or the CDCR agrees to never enforce the requirement again. Her most recent litigation involves California’s Megan’s Law website and demands that its legal violations be either immediately corrected or that it be taken down. This lawsuit is generating a stir in California, as well it should.

This exhibition at the NACDL is possible because of the generous support of RSOL’s membership. Thank you and we will update you as the event unfolds. From National RSOL

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Right on !!! Janice is a one of a kind. I think more attorneys need to follow her example and stand up!

I think this is awesome news! I really hope that a lot of attorneys attend this and that the seeds that Janice, et al are planting in California will be planted in other states too.
Thank you, Janice, again for caring. Thank you, Frank, for writing your book and sharing it with Janice.

Yes..Yes..this is excellent news and causes Hope to all concerned.
People put on a registry is a waste of taxpayers money and deceptive and a fraud.
Cheating people of their rights from the start of a fair trial on throughout this oppressive double jeopardy deprivation of rights .
This really is good news as this can get others involved nationally to right Wrongs..To correct Injustice .

I live in Vegas and hope this may be my chance to finally meet Janice and thank her personally! Not every day you get to meet one of your heroes!

I would like our attorneys to not only educate attorneys but also educators at many of our law schools throughout the state and country. While Janice and Chance are pushing forward we should encourage them to do so by mentoring some of those looking into serving as interns for civil rights. These young people need direction towards a future of doing that which is right and not that which is popular. Judges as well need to have the freedom of discretion without having to look over their shoulders about mandatory minimums. A resent Orange County judge was slammed by local leaders for doing his job in such an unpopular way. The website was challenged and lost a great deal of support and the recall failed against that judge… never under estimate the power of doing what is right. Just a few rays of light will chase away a room full of darkness…thanks everyone!