Laguna Beach school visitors will have names checked against national sex offender database

Beginning next month, visitors to any of Laguna Beach’s four public schools will need to provide identification to be checked against a nationwide sex offender database. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

20 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

just never ends does it– down the road in Seal Beach, put one fire out only for a new blaze to begin; is the a sex offender scale some where… when one law is stricken the sex offender demons must balance the world again

My B.S. detector just went haywire.
Nationwide, Raptor has identified and alerted officials to more than 50,000 sex offenders attempting to enter schools and issued over 250,000 custody alerts, according to the company’s website.

Me thinks this self-promotional statement deserves some honest fact checking.
1) How many times did they count the same person over again?
2) How many people had legitimate business at the school and were permitted to enter?
3) How many had absolutely no reason to be on school premises? Yet pulled out their identification not knowing they would be refused entry?
And…
4) How many were honestly not aware they needed permission to participate in their child’s well being?

Meanwhile, back in Albany, NY A woman had an honest to goodness conniption fit when she fiound out that a registrant father was allowed on school grounds to have breakfast with his daughter. The response was eerily similar to the Fontana School District response. You can bet the local state senator is already sharpening their pencil.

Dated 01/30/17: http://cbs6albany.com/news/local/district-to-speak-with-parents-after-sex-offender-found-visiting-in-school

Yet another reason to home school your kids!

What about all the teachers bangin the students? When I lived in Fresno, it seemed like once a week a teacher was arrested for it.

Just go to Google Search or Google News and type in “Teacher arrested”. Search the same for “Cop Arrested” Boom there ya go. Now you have a hell of a lot more to worry about you f*ing sheople. Time to get a grip on REALITY. It’s not the ones on the list you gotta worry about. It’s the ones NOT on the list. Especially the ones who put themselves close to kids. Morons!

All those little red dots on the maps don’t really matter, they’ve already been convicted and unlikely to ever commit a sex crime in the future. As far as I’m concerned and with empirical evidence to back up my statements, nearly all of them will never ever commit a sex crime (future tense).

Don’t even get me started on the DUI, Drug dealers, gangs, arson, murders. They all kill and harm and main children all the time, but those people are not on lists to be checked. If i was a politician, i would certainly climb the ladder with FEAR of ALL dangerous criminals, not just boogieman.

Oooh, i’m angry! /*shakes fist in the air*/

Isn’t this yet another example of singling out a group (of convicts) that we all can point to Bill of Attainder. No other set of ex-convicts or former convicts are put through this process.

There is no way I can leave my neighborhood without passing a school, daycare center or a park. So am I suppose to stay in my house and not going anywhere?

This is a disturbing article! What if your registerable and not on the Megan’s Website (non disclosable)? What if your a drug dealer/prostitute/drug user/gang banger/recently released murderer or wife beater? This is a lawsuit!!

My local school district in South central PA just recently put this system into all of the entire district schools. I find it highly irresponsible of the school board to pass/approve the purchase of this ridiculous system (to say the least). They are increasing property taxes every year due to the school budget; however, they can find the money to install this worthless system. Furthermore; and even more idiotic is that they perform this ‘security check’ upon entering the school; and if ‘ok’, is granted permission to enter……HOWEVER, their is NO security screening by metal detectors, etc.

So….I can not get approved to enter due to this ‘system’; however, the person behind me (who isn’t listed on Megan’s Law) BUT IS CARRYING A GUN may enter the school and start shooting up the place.

SO…… in the “Real World”……. which scenario is (and does) happen from time to time????? Oh yea, so much for this Raptor system protecting the students from the teachers and coaches who I am always reading about in the news having ‘encounters’ with students.

Raptor System (aka: the biggest Scam out there). Maybe I could go to the school boards and ‘Sell them an Ocean Front Property in Nevada’ …… since they are ‘dumb enough’ to fall for the Raptor Scam.

How our schools could save money: There’s a new bill that has been introduced SB695 that calls for the Tiering of the Sex Registry. Only 4 states require lifetime registration-California is one. Tiering would enable law enforcement to use the registry more effectively to identify higher risk offenders and to focus on those who most need to be monitored. This is in accord with the “Risk Principle” which states that those at higher risk should receive greater attention. There is little or no benefit from continuing to invest resources to monitor those who are at a low risk to reoffend. Tiering would also achieve considerable fiscal savings by discontinuing the monitoring of those thousands of registrants who pose a negligible threat to community safety after 10 or 10 years. (CASOMB )