Brock Turner judge Aaron Persky responds to calls for his removal

Admin

Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky, who came under fire for sentencing former Stanford swimmer Brock Turner to six months in county jail for sexual assault, sought Friday to dismiss demands for his removal, saying the court of law should be separated from the court of public opinion. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Judge Aaron Persky did his job by the book. He selected from all the options provided to him. I do not believe a couple of hot heads should be able to cause such a disturbance and cost to everyone else for their needs. If this Judge Persky was showing any favoritism in his past sentencing, there are agencies that would have taken him out.

0
Reply
View Replies (2)

I wonder how many of these “50 area activists” are playing around in the closet? Of those ” 50 area activists” would love to have Aaron Persky to be their judge when they are facing prison?

0
Reply

Then this should make every elected Judge fearful of their job if they don’t do the popular thing in the case presented and not the legal by book thing, though a judge can do what they please in the end, e.g. a lighter sentence than what was recommended even.

I don’t agree with lifetime judicial appointments at any level or electing judges at all. Judges appointed to terms, to me, is better for a specific time, e.g. like a cabinet member. I don’t mean for long terms either, e.g. 15 years, but something like six years then renewed if desired, but to two terms only. I realize this would really put the courts in a conundrum with who was appointing judges and how they may judge, but at least it would cause some pause for a recall like this. The appointer could always ask for their resignation since they are serving at the pleasure of the appointer.

This group is looking for long sentences and then some it appears to ensure no one ever survives lockup. What are they going to do if they are successful? Cause more work to be done to get a new judge in the court?

0
Reply