Houston federal judge revokes sex offender’s naturalized citizenship

Admin

A federal judge this week approved an order revoking the naturalized citizenship of a Harris County man convicted of a sex offense more than 20 years earlier, one of a growing number of immigrants stripped of citizenship in a push that began in the final years of the Obama administration. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I’m not sure why this story would be of interest here. This person committed a second offense 16 years later for the rape of a minor and was found to currently be in a Mexican prison serving a 18-year sentence. I feel no sympathy in this case. Most everyone deserves a second chance. He got his second chance and screwed up again. I don’t think he needs a third chance by being allowed back into the U.S. And I seriously doubt a Mexican prison offers him any therapy or rehabilitation services.

0
Reply
View Replies (1)

Hey, they get to leave the country now – we are stuck here.

0
Reply
View Replies (1)

This is a really nasty political endeavor It took 20 years to find? 10 years past the statute of limitations for an error / omission / lie on his application. That judge had to get creative to make his ruling happen. I do not know what it is, but something sounds really wrong with that effort.

0
Reply

it just shows how biased judges really are. I feel very little sympathy for the guy but these judges seem to feel that it is their job to find anyway possible to apply the law to convict or assist the DA or legislators in determining what laws will work to get a conviction…its as though they are an extension of the the legislative branch and the DA doesn’t even have to work or know what laws apply because the judges will figure out ways to apply the law to get a conviction that sticks

0
Reply

Works for me.

0
Reply
View Replies (1)