NY: Sex abuse record costs worker his job – Times Union

Schenectady
A city employee recently hired to be a housing inspector was promptly fired after city officials discovered he is a registered sex offender in New York.

“He’s no longer employed with the city,” said Mayor Gary McCarthy on Tuesday.

Full article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I feel so bad for this poor guy. I can truly sympathize with him.

How does one leave a comment?

It was a demeaning and menial job to begin with, yet he STILL got fired.

This way to the ovens.. it’s only civil and regulatory.

And remember… it’s not punitive!

That is a wrongful termination lawsuit right there.

They hired him without a criminal background check. They also didn’t ask about his criminal history on the application. He was hired.

They let him go immediately following getting information by vigilantes who thought he shouldn’t be working there. If I were him, i’d be finding a good lawyer right about now to go after those who alerted the employer for creating a situation where one didn’t exist, costing him his job, as well as going after the city for wrongful termination.

I believe this might be a good case.

I hate to hear this happening to this guy and am going to add it to my motion as evidence of the punitive nature of the registry but it does say he lied on his application if not directly then by his omission when he didn’t mark the conviction in the app. Unfortunately that is legally a justified reason for termination..I think it’s totally unjustifiable myself and really feel for the guy but I bet unless he challenges the registry and sues the people responsible for putting him on the registry and implying he is a danger to the public then there is no legal action against the county simply because he did not reveal his conviction in the application…this is just more evidence of the punitive nature of the registry though…

Mayor sounds really proud of his decision to keep this guy out.
Registry Rage, you’re so right with this statement…..
“This way to the ovens.. it’s only civil and regulatory.”