The date for the hearing in the ACLU case which was originally scheduled for Nov. 27 in Los Angeles has been delayed due to government request, so we will not be at the courthouse on Nov 27.
There is not yet a new date.
We will notify you as soon as we know what the new hearing date will be.
Lost my job, I’ll be there. I got the time now. I hope a lot of people show up
Can’t wait to see how this goes.
Not everyone’s crimes had to do with alcohol, and some parolees aren’t prohibited from drinking. Not all parolees’ crimes had to do with computers, and some aren’t barred from computers. But every registrant parolee is prohibited from social media and religious practices, even though most crimes of this nature didn’t involve social media or church?
I only wish the travesty that is Sharper Future – and the heinous conflict of interest involved with its chairman – was included in this lawsuit.
CDCR:
C = California
D = Department of
C = Corruption and
R = Retribution
CDCR.
If any of you are interested, here is a good “First Amendment Audit” video of the Parole Office located in Van Nuys:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzxrqR1SVSE
This is definitely something you can’t get away with when you’re on parole. But once the parole agent gets the sense that the photographer, Johnny Five O, is not on parole — and knows of his rights — the parole agent backs down. Kind of like a bully who comes across a kid that stands up for oneself?
Anyway, it’s interesting to watch as the citizen flexes — or abuses? — his First Amendment by asking the parole officer: “Is your mom on parole?”
LOL
WOW! And this whole time I didn’t think the ACLU cared. It’s nice too see the powerful people at ACLU fight back against the crooks at CDC”R”.
Maybe they gave the plaintif what he/she wanted to avoid “an official, on the record” outcome??