NE: Class action lawsuit filed on behalf of juveniles placed on sex offender list

The attorney who successfully sued to keep a 15-year-old boy’s name off the state’s Sex Offender Registry now is seeking to file a class-action lawsuit for those who the Nebraska State Patrol did list.

Attorney Joshua Weir said it ruined the lives of the seven — listed only as Johnny Doe I through VII — and dozens of others. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

But wait… The Supreme Court says it is NOT punishment. How could it possibly have ruined their lives????

Good Job! Let see the Sex Offender Registry fall apart!

I’ll never, ever understand how the law can talk out of both sides of its mouth. It’ll prosecute anyone over 18 for any illicit activity with anyone under 18 because that person is too young and vulnerable to make adult decisions, but then has no problem prosecuting those same minors like adults. Because apparently you’re never to young to be punished, only on making decisions. Like, teens and preteens being prosecuted for nude selfies as if they’re both the “victim” and “perpetrator” in one. I can somewhat see the corrupt motivation of the DA to do something like this (anything in the name of padding that resume full of victories!), but to also have the judges go along with it? It’s insane!

I was also always curious how sex crime laws apply to those teens who were emancipated? Is there a legal clause that makes an exception for this or is that teen no legally allowed to date outside of their age group because they’re too young while completely and legally living on their own due to the courts stating they’re in fact mature enough to do so? I’m going to guess that they have to be careful in how they straddle both worlds.

WE have to many double standards. A teen at 17 can join the Army and die for his/her country but can’t have a beer. A 14 year old can not legally go into any form of contract but if they kill someone or have sex or do sexting they are held accountable. To argue maturity is something else in today’s world because a 14 year old in today’s information age is more self-aware than say when my Grandmother who was married by 16 with two children.