Comments that are not specific to a certain post should go here, for the month of May 2018. Contributions should relate to the cause and goals of this organization and please, keep it courteous and civil.
Related posts
-
Senators call for audit of TSA’s facial recognition tech as use expands in airports | The Record from Recorded Future News
Source: therecord.media 11/22/24 A bipartisan group of 12 senators on Wednesday sent the Department of Homeland... -
-
SORNA Case Advances in Federal Court; PLF Files Motion for Summary Judgment
The Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) filed a motion for summary judgment on November 18 in its...
Hi Group,
I am going through a deregistration study in Texas apparently Texas is interested in finding out more.
But during the interview yesterday, the PhD student said something to me that blew my mind.
John Walsh the very one who pushed the Adam Walsh Act 20063
admitted he was in his 20’s and carried on a sexual relationship for a period of time.
Here is the link
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Walsh_(television_host)
Here is his comment in the link
In his book Tears of Rage, Walsh openly admits being in a relationship with 16-year-old Revé when Walsh was in his early 20s and aware of the age of consent being 17 in New York.[23] Critics of Adam Walsh Act have pointed out that, had he been convicted, Walsh himself would be subject to sex offender registration under the law which he aggressively promoted.
Does anyone know what is happening with Nevada. The Supreme Court there denied the patition against the Adam Walsh Act on April 27.
Of course. And I am certain Dennis Hastert voted in favor of the law as well. Filthy, lying, self-righteous hypocrites!
John Walsh is a sex offender. John Walsh appears stupid.
This reminds me of the saying “It’s not the fall that kills you – it’s the sudden stop.” Exposing himself didn’t “expose” him to prison, but failing to remind them that they had arrested him and that he had been in their custody does??
http://www.sunherald.com/news/local/crime/article210369989.html
To those in Texas, and I believe about 8 other states that have a similar Constitutional protection, you may find this helpful.
Texas, in addition to ex-post facto being unconstitutional, also has any retroactive civil law as unconstitutional.
Now, you would think that this would mean there shouldn’t be a registry enacted with retro-active penalties or retroactively placing people on the registry. Unfortunately, even the couple times someone brought this up the judges sided with the state and declared that the high rates of recidivism leaves the state no choice but to allow this retro-active civil penalty. This pretty much ignores Smith V Doe, which pretty much admitted that the registry wouldn’t be allowed if it were penal, but since its a civil remedy and the US Constitution doesn’t prevent retro civil action, it’s ok. Well, it shouldn’t be ok in Texas then since we don’t allow retro civil stuff either.
If you, or a lawyer you know, wants to brush up on how to fight the retroactive parts of the Texas registry now that there is more ammunition to debunk the “frightening and high” lies, you will want to read this very interesting Texas Supreme court case and all the comments that lead to declaring another Texas law unconstitutional for being a retroactive civil law:
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-supreme-court/1542319.html
ROBINSON v. CROWN CORK SEAL CO INC 2010
There are tons and tons of great quotes from the judges in this one that can be used for more than just retro cases too.
Here are a couple:
*****
a retroactive law is presumptively “unconstitutional without a compelling justification that does not greatly upset settled expectations”
*****
The judiciary thus has a superseding obligation to disapprove certain encroachments on liberty, no matter the legislative vote-count
*****
“Cyber Crimes Task Force sees drastic increase in crime” Apparently Missouri has seen a spike in child porn, “enticement” (entrapment) arrests. http://www.fourstateshomepage.com/news/cyber-crimes-task-force-sees-drastic-increase-in-crime/1160607365
“‘Extremely complex’ sex offender residency restrictions are challenging to enforce” (Missouri)
“A Columbia Missourian analysis of residency restrictions revealed sex offender laws are complicated and ever-changing, posing significant challenges for officials responsible for public safety. Experts say, however, there is no hard evidence that Missouri’s restrictions have had any effect on recidivism.”
https://www.columbiamissourian.com/news/local/extremely-complex-sex-offender-residency-restrictions-are-challenging-to-enforce/article_ca5cac0c-4fd7-11e8-9ebc-7b85485fdce1.html
FB won’t let RCs on, meanwhile they’re apparently complicit in supporting terrorism (no hyperbole): https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/05/05/facebook-accused-introducing-extremists-one-another-suggested/
Good thing this article didn’t come out on April 1, or nobody would have believed it.
Well I do not know if I posted this already but here is just some of the evidence the court is going to have to deal with in my case.
https://ufile.io/icgae
This doesn’t include witnesses, the job rejections that I now have proof of, or the fact that all the gov reports are filed as adjudicative facts the court has to take judicial notice of. Nor does it have the references to all the statutory disabilities that bar employment, housing, etc. The only reason I had to include the local and out of state ordinances and state codes were just for verification since the AG and the court seemed to need me to be specific about those ordinances and codes, so there they are…I hope someone with the dedication and knowledge about the legalese and judicial process takes these elements and files in state court because I think that the possibility of losing, if argued correctly, in the state courts is slim if at all…..
I think the origins of the registry can be used somehow against them as well I just haven’t not really dug into it yet..
http://www.solresearch.org/report/Origin_of_Registry
to Chris F.
Absolutely right. The Texas deregistration double speak is crazy. Texas is not an AWA compliant state, yet, they still base the deregistration off of the federal AWA statutes. Stupid! They have no intention of letting anyone off of the registry. Sorry about misspelling Lile’s name. Ya know, he could greatly influence the process of changing this if he so desired, I believe. But, his practice is such a cash cow he probably does not want to risk losing any clients. another thing is why has no one challenged the Texas deferred adjudication statute stating that if successfully completed, like me 10yrs, it is not a conviction. thus no conviction, no registry!!!
@AJ
I followed your advice and got a job!
Yeah it sounds crazy everything they want you to prove in order to get off the registry down there. Sure is a complete 180 from them having to prove your guilty of a crime to you having to prove your not guilty of a future crime. Absolutely insane. That is like I heard some where that someone went to trial over something (I know incredibly vague) but after being acquitted the court still found them guilty because of the sins of others were the sins of all so therefore you can never be completely innocent, or something to that effect. I tried watching that Walsh video but it goes straight to some terror crap. I kind of wanted to see Walsh explain himself…Can not even find anything on it. What BS. The dude needs to be on the list just like everyone else. Someone needs to demand he be prosecuted. There is no longer statute of limitations in CA at least on child molestation cases so he needs to be prosecuted just as everyone else is….Course it wont happen….
Anybody know if traveling by airplane from.california to kansas would be a problem? Will they say something when i arrive at the airport in kansas if im travelling within states?
Thank you to the commentator that allows so many to voice their thoughts, opinions and responses to other’s devastating ordeals and life events.
Thanks Janice for having this person(s) monitor the site and edit or allow vocal feelings and thoughts here !
Florida man tries to set motel fire to ‘barbecue all the child molesters’
http://abc7.com/man-tries-to-barbecue-all-the-child-molesters/3436857/
I saw this on the morning news today. He knew they were sex offenders and confessed to trying to kill them.
http://wreg.com/2018/05/07/florida-man-reportedly-confesses-to-trying-to-burn-sex-offenders-alive/
http://fox43.com/2018/05/07/man-accused-of-trying-to-burn-several-sex-offenders-to-death-at-motel/
http://wtvr.com/2018/05/07/man-accused-of-trying-to-burn-several-sex-offenders-to-death-at-motel/
http://kutv.com/news/nation-world/police-florida-man-jailed-after-trying-to-barbecue-all-the-child-molesters
http://www.wesh.com/article/man-accused-of-trying-to-kill-several-people-in-kissimmee/20193028
Yep, more evidence for a supplemental filing….LostandDevastated good for you. Do whatever you can to pull ahead and never give up….It will not be long now before the registry either comes down or the country goes completely and irrevocably to h^^&$%….
I am going straight up tell the Judge, ” Your Honor the supreme court sided on the side of the registrant in the anonymous free speech rights and I am here to tell you that I would much rather have my family and I safe from verbal or physical harm than to have anonymous speech on the Internet, I would much rather have unsupervised visitation for my wife and I of our grandson, I would much rather be able for my new wife and I to have children, I would much rather be able to move where I want without the burdens imposed on me as well as without being threatened with physical violence, I would much rather be able to travel without all the burdens placed on me, I would much rather be able to work at a job and not have to worry about being fired or harassed, and I might throw a couple other I would much rather points in there. I want to make the case for the state look ridiculous and give the judge no way out without looking like some dictators Hench men that cannot think for himself….
Thank you my friend…..I am giving it my best at both LOL….I found it kind of comical that the AG was trying to set dates during finals when I am sure she knows when they are and that you cannot miss them ‘no matter what’ or you wasted the whole semester and fail your class.. Nope is not going to happen….
The N.Y. A.G. steps down after solid allegations of physical abuse of MULTIPLE women. The POTUS has MULTIPLE affairs. The man representing him had multiple affairs. The men who initiated horrible laws affecting over 1 million Americans( not counting families!) admitted to committing the very crimes that they fought against. Yet the vast majority of us that have been loyal to our spouses, observed the laws and ADMITTED our mistakes are the ones looked on with distain. I myself never strayed from the 3 relationships I had since the age of 21( now 55 ) and have never once come close to any level of abuse to a single living creature ( I don’t even kill spiders!). All this shows that the people who need to be judged are not people like ourselves, for we stumbled, but got back on the path. No, the people that decided that the laws don’t apply to them and continue to be immune to them. These are the scum that need to be brought to the ultimate justice.
Noticed something new on the registration requirements this year in California.
I understand if I wish to come into any school building or upon any school ground (grades K-12), I must have a lawful purpose and written permission from the school’s chief administrative officer indicating the date(s) and time(s) for which permission has been granted. (PC, 626.81)
When did this become law and does it apply to all registrants? I don’t have kids and am years away from thinking about having any children, but for current parents and soon to be parents this requirement is likely upsetting.
Shi*^* look at this people.. I think I am on the right path here. First judicial notice and now this….Hmmmm. Wonder how the AG is going to respond to this because if she doesn’t, she admits it is all true….Just a little extra surety in my case…I am pretty sure I was supposed to do this anyways and thank god I seen it today because I only had until like the 24 or 5 to do this, it states 30 days after the meet and confer on the phone and that was April 25
https://ufile.io/4afz3
This is great, I am going to force her to respond….
Compassion International denying donations from RCs now
https://narsol.org/2018/05/part-ii-andys-story/#comments