TX: Commissioners call on state to strengthen sex offender laws

[cleburnetimesreview.com – 6/15/18]\

The problem warrants concern, and is growing, Johnson County Sheriff Adam King said.

“We’re averaging two to four new sex offenders per week moving into the county as the cities continue to squeeze them out,” King said.

And it’s not just the cities within Johnson County.

“As a suburban county next door to a large urbanized county we’re getting a lot of sex offenders moving into the unincorporated portions of Johnson County,” Johnson County Commissioner Larry Woolley said.

The problem, King and Woolley said, is the authority cities have to pass ordinances governing sex offenders that Texas counties lack.

“Cities can institute 2,000 foot child safety zones around schools, churches, swimming pools, arcades and other areas where children tend to be, where sex offenders can’t live or work in those areas,” Woolley said. “We don’t have that authority in the county.”

That Tarrant and Dallas counties are mainly city filled with little unincorporated county area has compounded the problem, both said, prompting numerous sex offenders from those counties to relocate to Johnson and other area smaller population counties.

The problem, county officials and residents say, is that schools, churches and other such areas where children tend to congregate exist in unincorporated areas.

To that end, commissioners, during their Monday meeting, approved a resolution calling upon the state Legislature to address the issue during their next session in January.

“It’s only fair that counties have the same rights as cities in this issue,” Johnson County Judge Roger Harmon said. “The Legislature gives us little authority to regulate. We can regulate sexually oriented businesses, but not this.”

Woolley concurred.

“This resolution is just asking the Legislature to give us the same authority cities have,” Woolley said. “I can’t imagine anybody thinking that isn’t right.”

King confirmed the numbers are growing.

“In January 2017 the sheriff’s office was dealing with 386 sex offenders,” King said. “The most recent count is 518 and those are just the ones we deal with at the sheriff’s office who are living in unincorporated county areas. That’s not counting the ones the Cleburne, Burleson and other city police departments are dealing with.

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Is crazy how states want to enforce or create new laws that crate very little hope of living in the so called “the free world”, or live the “American Dream” for former registrants. I’m a former registrant, I just completed three months since being out, I am on probation(formal) and I wonder if LA county is going to do the same or sit back and really think for once and not jump to conclusions without knowing facts (society). I’m a father of two(boy and girl) and a husband. I think about them everyday and not knowing how to navigate around this but just face it forward and take it one day at a time is all I have, as well as my wife, because our children do not know, they are yet very small. Every day I wake up wondering when is React, LAPD or Probation, going to come to my house guns blazing, have my family woken up at 5 or 6 in the morning and them seeing me being handcuffed while they do their compliance check. I don’t want my family to see me in handcuffs anymore. I hate that I’m putting my family through this, and I wonder what law makers in our state are going to do. I pray, and I have faith no matter what. I made a mistake and a mistake that I or any registrant doesn’t matter the case, shouldn’t have to be punished for the rest of their lives. Please comment…..

Are sex offenders the only ones moving in??

“This resolution is just asking the Legislature to give us the same authority cities have,” Woolley said. “I can’t imagine anybody thinking that isn’t right.”

Anyone who understands the concept of civil rights must think that it isn’t right.

If cities and counties in Texas can establish residency restrictions on sex offenders, we’ll all be living under bridges.

Here’s a thought: instead of giving counties the same authority to pass residency restrictions, how about the state remove the authority entirely and simply disallow it!

Mind. Blown.

Why doesn’t anyone even attempt to dispute the assumptive nature of this article and all featured that the registrants forced out of their native counties are a threat at all?

Again, while they oppress those who have already served their time, they don’t realize the people entrusted in their own lives are the ones most likely to commit a crime.

Texas is quickly going downhill.

We lost the fight against the City of Lewisville over residency restrictions, mostly due to lack of challenging Substantive Due Process and banishment.

Then, last year minor cities were granted the ability by legislature to set residency restrictions that previously only large cities could do.

Now, it’s going to be a war of who can set the highest restrictions to force sex offenders out and then just keep raising them.