MI: Attorney General Nessel Weighs in On Sex Offender Registration Cases Before MI Supreme Court

Admin

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel filed amicus briefs in the Michigan Supreme Court today in Michigan v Snyder (Case number 153696) and People v Betts (Case number 148981), arguing that Michigan’s sex offender registration and notification requirements are punishment because they are so burdensome and fail to distinguish between dangerous offenders and those who are not a threat to the community. Full Announcement

Related

Attorney General: Michigan Sex Offender Registry too broad, lost effectiveness

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

77 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Yeah, but remember court records are as easily accessible public records. Yeah right, I looked like hell for my state court records in my own case and have yet to locate any of them besides the appeal decision.

0
Reply

Hello Everyone,

Here is the Schedule for oral arguments concerning Michigan v David Snyder and Michigan v Paul Betts

https://courts.michigan.gov/Courts/MichiganSupremeCourt/Clerks/Documents/2018-2019/March%202019%20call.pdf

0
Reply
View Replies (3)

I plan on listening live to this court case.

https://courts.michigan.gov/Courts/MichiganSupremeCourt/Pages/default.aspx

0
Reply
View Replies (1)

The AG is 1000 % Right ! The sex offenders registers Can never STOP a sex crime. It is just for punishment If you really break it down for it to be a safe guard there is nothing! Think about it I can move to different places where Nobody know, S me and than come back home. No one knew that I was any kind of danger to them.So tell me How did the register list protect You!!

0
Reply

This is also interesting… A brief from ACLU filed a week before the AG’s brief.

https://courts.michigan.gov/Courts/MichiganSupremeCourt/Clerks/Documents/2018-2019/148981/148981_35_01_AC_ACLU_Brf.pdf

Looks like it’s weighing on legislation to correct this mess!

0
Reply
View Replies (1)
1 2