China to build child sex offender database

[china.org.cn – 8/3/19]

China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP) announced Friday that a national database of child sex offenders will be established.

The SPP will also promote the building of relevant inquiry and restriction mechanisms for candidates seeking employment related to minors, said Shi Weizhong, a senior prosecutor with the SPP, at a video conference on inter-agency protection of rural left-behind children and children living in difficulties.

Over 3,600 suspects have been prosecuted for criminal offenses against rural left-behind children since 2018, according to Shi.

In the following phase, the procuratorate organs will intensify the supervision on legal proceedings involving disadvantaged children and put in place a compulsory reporting system on possible offenses against them.

Under the proposed system, educational, medical, relief management and welfare institutions will be obligated to promptly report such offenses or suspected offenses, as well as abandonment, according to Shi.

Read the original page

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Finally A title that does not use the term ” registry ” which is a politically correct euphemism for ” an electronic database. ” I’ve made an issue of this subject matter via email to advocates. Maybe some ears are listening.

In China’s case a big communist gov database. The communists there see how darn politically advantageous it is to promote this particular use of the machine. It lends credence to gov surveillance. Come upon a political rival with better ideas than you? Put them on the database.
America’s SORs is a big socialist gov database. It’s roots from OMNIBUS94 when D’s were in full control of the popular populist vote. The federal unionized socialists also had the Top man on SCOTUS, the agenda setter for the court, one Mr. Rehnquist. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Rehnquist
While Wiki puts him in the conservative ilk- every RINO I’ve seen also makes that claim. Perhaps a better understanding of the man can be had by a review and research of time period Milwaukee politics in his early years in Shorewood, no I don’t mean watching “Happydays” nor “Lavern & Shirley” re-runs. Rehnquist’s parents were also engaged politicos.

The bill HR5533 Signed into law by W.J.C. a reputed rapist by several women.
Ain’t that America? Another mass shooting in El paso, TX. today.

No! Not my country of ancestry. This hurts.

Unless they don’t mean a public registry….