CA: 7 Sex Offenders Released Early Due to COVID-19 in Orange County Despite Parole Violations

[nbclosangeles.com – 4/30/20]

Seven sex offenders who violated parole were released from jail early as part of the Orange County Sheriff’s Department reducing its inmate population during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The sex offenders were released months before schedule, despite being charged with violating their parole by cutting off their GPS monitors and tampering with their tracking devices, according to the Orange County District Attorney’s Public Information Officer Kimberly Edds.

California law requires sex offenders who violate their parole in this way to serve six months in jail, but many of the sex offenders who have been released during the pandemic served just days, Edds said.

…said Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer. “As a state legislator, I was the author and founder of the State of California Sex Offender Management Board and the author of Megan’s Law on the Internet, which allows the public to see where these sex offenders are so that they can protect themselves and their families.”

Read the entire article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

42 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I was watching a wonderful documentary last night. It was about the 16 year old girl who killed her client. When evaluating her, they did a psychological evaluation. It was very interesting to see how she reacted to photos she was shown. She was to describe the scene and was then asked how the story ended? Good? Bad? You guys clearly fall within those parameters. I truly feel sorry for you. You exhibit much the same. Thanks for confirming what I already knew.

@mike r. while I don’t know you and that is beside’s the point. I would rather release 7 sex offenders than to have those on my conscious. And yes that would be morsal and ethical. This whole sex offender issue isnt’ right and it isn’t a one night stand, or are many a bunch of vain or conceitted blind men and women when it comes to truth and justice. I could even see why some had to have a good laugh over some misjudgement. I’m no angel myself course we all do the best we can but we all try.

Even governments are no angels. Oops I forgot the California angels are out in California but thats a baseball team of who plays foul ball with a human life. This registry has to go in many ways. In a situation such as this that would be the right thing to do or should one give a behavior lesson before release. One wonder who tricks who today.

@USA, “It was about the 16 year old girl who killed her client”
You have some weird obsession with the client/john relationship. I think it is to attempt to keep what miserable so called skills of manipulation you have been taught. And yeah, how did you know it was a full service parlor? Better stay away USA or maybe we all might just snitch to the cops on you, cops were probably already tripped out by you being what your situation is and what you were telling on. Cops and judges and DAs you have dealt with must think you are exactly what you are, an idiot.

People only lash out at those whom they feel are a threat to them? Insecure? Low self esteem? This allows them to feel better about themselves. Very immature and this is also uncommon among educated individuals. I’ll be leaving this site before the end of the year. Roll on children. High school

If the DOJ places you in a tier to be determined then you will remain on the registery for another 2 years no explanation/resion needed and I can guarantee that more then hafe of the people who qualified to be removed from registery will be placed in this category
.